I have looked and searched for a comparison and cannot find one, so please forgive me if there is one!
I have been looking at the 70-200 L lenses from Canon and it seemed that the f/4 IS was the one due to all the positive feedback coupled with IS, constant aperture, size, weight and the amazing images it achieves, not to mention the price!
The 2.8 IS II looks lovely but is simply a no-no due to price, so that's not in the picture.
How does the first version of the f/2.8 IS compare to the f/4 IS? I'm not interested in how the f/2.8 IS II compares to the f/4 IS, just the 1st version please.
I like the idea of 2.8 instead of 4. I want the IS, I want a zoom, I want 'L' standard quality and I want a constant aperture so please no recommendations of the 100-400 etc. thank you.
Has anyone had both of these lenses in their hands, and which would you say is the better lens and why?