Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Nature & Landscapes Talk 
Thread started 01 Jan 2011 (Saturday) 13:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Wide Angle Lens Suggestion

 
hieu1004
Goldmember
Avatar
3,579 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Seattle
     
Jan 14, 2011 23:15 |  #16

^There are so many comparisons and info online, it's ridiculous. Just do a simple search for "Sigma 10-20mm vs Canon 10-22mm" and read the existing abundance of info available, both here and on external sites.


-Hieu
Gear | Blog (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
spife7980
Member
120 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: central texas
     
Jan 24, 2011 12:08 |  #17

i think the consensus is that you will not be disappointed in the sigma but the 10-22 is just over the top awesome if you can swing the few more bucks that way. i know i hardly ever take my 10-22 off just because i love shooting with it that much.


40D | 18-55mm IS I 10-22 I| 70-200mm f/4 L USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Matthew.Samos
Member
38 posts
Joined Jan 2009
     
Jan 25, 2011 09:26 |  #18

I'm going to vouch for the EF-S 10-22mm as well. It's on my camera about 60% of the time.

However, I will say that when I was in your position, I had a very difficult time choosing as well. I ultimately went with the Canon mostly for the simple facts that it's a Canon--which has traditionally given me a little more peace of mind than third-party manufacturers, and I could afford it. I do believe the Canon is of slightly higher quality, but that comes with the price difference. I'd say that if you can't spring for the Canon, but can afford the Sigma--go for it. You'll be happy to finally get out and shoot wide with a great lens. Any difference there may be isn't monumental, and you already can't lose because they're both highly reputable lenses.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Enrico84
Member
Avatar
47 posts
Joined May 2010
     
Feb 04, 2011 16:49 |  #19

17-40 here and awesome results (also compared to price paid!)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffCS
Member
37 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Feb 07, 2011 15:08 as a reply to  @ post 11643710 |  #20

I own both the Canon 17-40 f/4 L and 24-105 f/4 L. For general travel photography I find that I use the 24-105 most of the the time and if I need to go wider, I'll use the 17-40. I use a 5D Mark II now, but bought the 17-40 when I was shooting with a 30D and thought the combination worked great. Both lenses offer great image quality and by most expert reviews, the 24-105 f/4 L and 24-70 f/2.8 L you mentioned in your original post have almost equal optical quality and with IS even though the 24-105 is one stop slower than the 24-70, the IS easily makes up for that one stop.

For greater details on these lenses, read the reviews on www.the-digital-picture.com (external link).

Good luck, Jeff


Jeff |http://www.jeffsagar.c​om (external link)
Canon EOS 5D Mark II|17-40 f/4 L|24-105 f/4 L|70-200 f2.8 L|100 f/2.8 macro
Gitzo GT3531 LSV tripod|Arca-Swiss Monoball Z-1 tripod head

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
L.J.G.
"Not brigth enough"
Avatar
10,463 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 40
Joined Jul 2010
Location: ɹǝpun uʍop
     
Feb 07, 2011 15:21 |  #21

I'm another Canon 10-22 owner and mine was my most used lens, I love it. But I have since brought a 15-85 and it now seems to spend the most time on my camera out of all my lenses. It does not have the width, but I find it a more useful as an all round lens.


Lloyd
Never make the same mistake twice, there are so many new ones, try a different one each day
Gear Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slartibardfast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Shropshire England
     
Feb 10, 2011 17:05 |  #22

I have the Sigma 8 - 16 which is perfect for the internal shots i use it for but for landscapes i wish i could add a filter to it be it a grad or an ND filter ... but you cant :C


www.three6t.co.uk (external link)
http://www.facebook.co​m/three6t (external link)
1DX, 50D, 300D, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, 24 - 105 F/4 L IS USM, 100 - 400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM
Sigma 8 - 16mm, 18-55 kit, sigma 55 - 200 & Sigma 170 - 500mm and a creative mind.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krice
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Wilmington DE
     
Feb 10, 2011 21:53 as a reply to  @ post 11643710 |  #23

I just bought a Sigma 10-22, it hasn't arrived yet but I have been able to play with one already and it was AMAZING on my 450D so far. I am a completely novice photographer but the wide angle that it allows is stunning to me so far.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,744 views & 0 likes for this thread
Wide Angle Lens Suggestion
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Nature & Landscapes Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Vijayanayagam
1031 guests, 331 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.