Another one from this past Saturday night...Second timer too!
barkingspud Senior Member ![]() 511 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Chi-Town Burbs More info | Feb 21, 2011 19:41 | #1 |
tamadrummer1120 Senior Member 325 posts Joined Dec 2010 Location: Southern MD More info | Feb 21, 2011 22:18 | #2 very strong and powerful stance coming from her....but something about her facial expression takes away from that. besides that, a really great shot. Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 22, 2011 06:46 | #3 I like the image, i like the pose, but as mentioned by the above the facial expression takes away from the image. I wish she was looking more towards me(camera) instead of upwards Canon Rebel T2i | 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
arnie12 Well, I thought I wasn't going to be noticed 391 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Feb 22, 2011 06:48 | #4 siiilent wrote in post #11890731 ![]() I like the image, i like the pose, but as mentioned by the above the facial expression takes away from the image. I wish she was looking more towards me(camera) instead of upwards Are we looking at the same picture? http://www.modelmayhem.com/1017634
LOG IN TO REPLY |
barkingspud THREAD STARTER Senior Member ![]() 511 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Chi-Town Burbs More info | Feb 22, 2011 08:15 | #5 Thanks...She wears braces so, facial expressions were limited. And I'm not sure what planet you are from (arnie12) but she is a real woman...Not a rack on which to hang clothes. Personally, I think she looks fantastic in this dress.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
arnie12 Well, I thought I wasn't going to be noticed 391 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Yeah, but a little smile would go a long way. You can also smile without flashing your teeth (braces) http://www.modelmayhem.com/1017634
LOG IN TO REPLY |
barkingspud THREAD STARTER Senior Member ![]() 511 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Chi-Town Burbs More info | Feb 22, 2011 13:28 | #7 Arnie...I don't see anything unflattering about this pose...It's all a matter of opinion. She is more than happy with the results and in the end, that's what matters...The smile thing is another thing entirely and she was uncomfortable showing even the littlest smile.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Feb 22, 2011 13:30 | #8 Standing square adds bulk. Ordinarily you want to avoid it. This is a very aggressive pose and it works to a degree but I think there are angled poses that would be more flattering.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
barkingspud THREAD STARTER Senior Member ![]() 511 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Chi-Town Burbs More info | Feb 22, 2011 13:59 | #9 Understand it's an agressive pose...That's what I was going for...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Niveks Member 148 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: NorCal More info | Feb 24, 2011 01:23 | #10 an excellent shot, good lighting and what not.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pprice Goldmember ![]() 1,714 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Gods Country (aka Mississippi) More info | Feb 24, 2011 03:34 | #11 I dont think people on here are saying that she is fat (because she is not), I think the main reason for taking photos with an angle and such is to get the model looking maybe a little more slim than she is...I think the reason for this is not for others, but for the model. I find that most of the time when I take photos of women, they are very hard on themself and ALWAYS think they look fat (even if they are a rail). I will slim them up just a hair in post (even if it is just the slightest), just to make them like the photo more. 1D MKIII 16-35 2.8L MKII 24-70 2.8L 70-200 2.8L [COLOR=black]IS 300 2.8L IS (few others) Bunch of AB lighting
LOG IN TO REPLY |
barkingspud THREAD STARTER Senior Member ![]() 511 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Chi-Town Burbs More info | Feb 24, 2011 12:57 | #12 Thanks folks...When I directed her to pose I told her to think of a pose akin to Charlie's Angels, Strong and very sexy...I think I got what I was looking for and she did too. There are a bunch of other shots that are posed with her at more of an angle to the camera and such, don't have that look that I was going for and I wanted to shoe the light through her dress as well....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
antifire Senior Member ![]() 667 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Munich, Germany More info | Feb 24, 2011 18:24 | #13 The upward gaze doesn't jibe well with her pose.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pprice Goldmember ![]() 1,714 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Gods Country (aka Mississippi) More info | Feb 24, 2011 22:18 | #14 barkingspud wrote in post #11906238 ![]() I think I got what I was looking for and she did too. Enough said 1D MKIII 16-35 2.8L MKII 24-70 2.8L 70-200 2.8L [COLOR=black]IS 300 2.8L IS (few others) Bunch of AB lighting
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is doubleUV 1073 guests, 212 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |