24-105 works good for me
24-105 works good for me
LOG IN TO REPLY |
adamau5 Member 161 posts Joined May 2010 More info | Feb 18, 2011 14:23 | #77 tamron 17-50. super value for money. http://aw-photography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eos1 Member 36 posts Joined Feb 2011 More info | Feb 18, 2011 14:28 | #78 Probably the 35mm f/2. [ 1D MkIII / 35mm f2 / 24-105 f4L / 70-200 f2.8Σ ]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JuliusUpNorth Senior Member 522 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Canada More info | Feb 18, 2011 17:45 | #79 Without doubt the 100-400. Although that is followed closely by the 100 (non-IS) macro).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SteveJa Goldmember 2,137 posts Likes: 23 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Nebraska More info |
kevindar Cream of the Crop ![]() 5,050 posts Likes: 38 Joined May 2007 Location: california More info | Feb 18, 2011 17:56 | #81 I shoot everything so it depends on whats my muse at the time. I would say my 85 1.2, and 16-35II are probably my most used lens, though I have been using the sigma 120-400OS more recently b/c its a new aquisition and I have been playing with bird photography. My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ears Senior Member ![]() 552 posts Joined Oct 2008 Location: Orange County/Riverside, Ca More info | Feb 18, 2011 18:34 | #82 This should be a poll. Anyways, 24-70 here! 5d MkIII / 6D SOLD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
booja Goldmember 1,638 posts Likes: 103 Joined Jan 2008 Location: houston, tx More info | Feb 18, 2011 19:11 | #83 35L and 85L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2011 19:19 | #84 My 70-200 f/2.8L IS MkI pretty much lives on my camera. α7R IV | Σ 24-70 f/2.8 | Σ 150-600 f/5-6.3 | Σ 14-24 f/2.8 | 1D MkIII | 430EX II | 24-70 f/2.8L | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mansalim Goldmember 1,105 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: 16801 More info | Feb 19, 2011 05:13 | #85 GuitarFreak wrote in post #11870520 ![]() My 70-200 f/2.8L IS MkI pretty much lives on my camera. does it grow? give it some water and food.. someday it will evolve to 400mm f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ironchef31 Senior Member 623 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Vancouver More info | Feb 27, 2011 23:21 | #86 The L lens and R lens the good Lord gave me. Both of them front focus a bit. Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jaybee33 Junior Member 27 posts Joined Sep 2010 More info | Feb 27, 2011 23:29 | #87 17-50 mm 60D/S100 - 24-105mm L/Tamron 17-50mmVC/Sigma 30mm/60mm EF-S/55-250mm EF-S
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Evan Idler Goldmember ![]() 1,600 posts Likes: 4 Joined May 2005 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada More info | Feb 27, 2011 23:36 | #88 My Tamron 17-50 F/2.8, followed by the Sigma 150-500 OS, then the Canon 70-200 F/2.8 L IS II. Canon5DIII + Some L + Some non L + Some Sigma + Some Tamron + other stuff....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DL Photo Senior Member 577 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: Richmond, BC, Canada More info | Feb 27, 2011 23:39 | #90 17-55.....and then 70-200 f4 IS G16
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is sinonaut 851 guests, 194 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |