Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 22 Feb 2011 (Tuesday) 15:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Oh Canon... Cleaning service cost $219?

 
cptrios
Goldmember
Avatar
1,744 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Boston, USA / Burgundy, France
     
Feb 23, 2011 06:45 |  #31

Dickson, where do you live? I'm personally in the "learn to live with dust in the viewfinder" camp, but there was a point right after I bought my 5d2 where I accidentally knocked the focusing screen out and wound up getting enough dust on the superimpose plate to seriously distract me while shooting. My local camera repair shop (in Arlington, MA) cleaned it and replaced the focusing screen for $50 total.


Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent
My weak lil' 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Feb 23, 2011 06:47 |  #32

When I started I got dust in my viewfinder and I sent it in to get cleaned. Came back all shiny and I was happy. A couple days later I got another spec in the viewfinder and that's when I learned to say "F it" over dust in the viewfinder. It doesn't do anything and generally I have to be looking for it to see it.

That and I stopped using the blowers everyone seems to recommend. All they do for me is get dust elsewhere in the camera. Wet cleaning is easy enough and I don't do it all that often.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nicholas ­ R.
Senior Member
Avatar
455 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Feb 23, 2011 06:57 |  #33

lannes wrote in post #11894368 (external link)
It quite an easy process to clean the viewfinder, you just need patience, a relatively dust free environment and the right tools.

I use Visible Dust Sensor clear instead of the eclipse used in the process, as some have suggested Eclipse can damage plastics.

Who besides you and the company you mentioned has suggested Eclipse damages plastic? Why are you spreading incorrect and misleading information here that one particular company continues to lie about? Please post a link describing how Eclipse damaged plastic, OK? If you don't have comprehensive/concrete proof of your theory besides internet propaganda, then retract your statement.

Look, you obviously use that company's products and are happy with them. Why can't you leave it at that instead of furthering along their fantasy claims about Photographic Solutions? Read this before you reply:

http://www.cleaningsen​sors.com (external link)

Nicholas




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PUREBRAD
Senior Member
417 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Lyndhurst, NJ
     
Feb 23, 2011 08:16 as a reply to  @ Nicholas R.'s post |  #34

Am I missing something here? 33 responses about how much cleaning should cost and how expensive the charge was. The first post identifies that not only a standard service was completed, but also that the grip was stuck on the camera. I would imagine that stuck grip removal is labor intensive and added significantly to the cost of the service charge.


50D / 28-1.8 / 100-2.8L / 200-2.8L / YN565Ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lannes
Goldmember
Avatar
4,370 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Feb 23, 2011 09:30 |  #35

Nicholas R. wrote in post #11897695 (external link)
Who besides you and the company you mentioned has suggested Eclipse damages plastic? Why are you spreading incorrect and misleading information here that one particular company continues to lie about? Please post a link describing how Eclipse damaged plastic, OK? If you don't have comprehensive/concrete proof of your theory besides internet propaganda, then retract your statement.

Look, you obviously use that company's products and are happy with them. Why can't you leave it at that instead of furthering along their fantasy claims about Photographic Solutions? Read this before you reply:

http://www.cleaningsen​sors.com (external link)

Nicholas

When I suggested using eclipse in another post, other forum members suggested it would damage plastic due to the methanol.

Here is the other link, I was making reference to those comments so I would not be criticized again.

https://photography-on-the.net …ht=shimworld#po​st11731070.

I don't have a problem with using eclipse on plastics, other members of the forum do.

According to this website, methanol does affect some types of plastic like ABS.

http://www.coleparmer.​com/techinfo/chemcompr​esults.asp (external link)


1Dx, 1DM4, 5DM2, 7D, EOS-M, 8-15L, 17-40L, 24 TSE II, 24-105L, 50L, 85L II, 100L, 135L, 200L f/2.8, 300L f/4, 70-200L II, 70-300L, 400Lf/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Feb 23, 2011 09:51 |  #36

dickson918 wrote in post #11893726 (external link)
I know how to clean the sensor, the reason I sent it to Canon was the viewfinder.

I had a BIG squiggly hair in the finder. I just hit it with th blower. As far as specs,I am ok with that.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nicholas ­ R.
Senior Member
Avatar
455 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Feb 23, 2011 09:57 |  #37

lannes wrote in post #11898318 (external link)
When I suggested using eclipse in another post, other forum members suggested it would damage plastic due to the methanol.

Here is the other link, I was making reference to those comments so I would not be criticized again.

https://photography-on-the.net …ht=shimworld#po​st11731070.

I don't have a problem with using eclipse on plastics, other members of the forum do.

Duly noted. I have used Eclipse on my focusing screen, my coated lenses, the plastic parts of my camera's body, the LCD screen, the rubber seals on my lenses and mount, etc., etc. with no damaging effects whatsoever. Again, believe whatever you want on the internet, but do not believe everthing you read. I am giving people here real-world camera cleaning experiences with Eclipse and most components of a D-SLR. You're using 2 or 3 drops of it at a time, if I were to soak a sensor or focusing screen in it for 24 hours, that is another animal. Using said amount, it totally evaporates in 3 seconds. Spare the chemical links, we're cleaning cameras here. You could post the press releases for the products you use and expect everyone reading this to believe them, too.

There is unsubstantiated propaganda by some companies regarding Eclipse that clouds and distorts the facts. Methanol is a solvent, not a corrosive and their online "information" :rolleyes: infers the opposite as well as exaggerating the dangers of working with it.

Nicholas




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_48
Goldmember
Avatar
2,068 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Brookfield, MA
     
Feb 23, 2011 10:38 |  #38

Nicholas R. wrote in post #11898447 (external link)
I have used Eclipse on my focusing screen, ..... the rubber seals on my lenses and mount,.......
Nicholas

While I may not hesitate to use Eclipse on most everything else you mentioned, I wouldn't use it on rubber. The Eclipse, if alcohol based will clean rubber well, but over time can dry out rubber making it hard and less resilient and prone to cracking. I'm saying this based on years of maintenance on tape decks and general knowledge that while alcohol is a good tape head cleaner, one never should use it on rubber drive parts, such as the rubber capstan pinch roller on a tape deck simply for the problems I had mentioned.
A cloth lightly dampened should be most adequate for rubber parts.


Megapixels and high ISO are a digital photographers heroin. Once you have a little, you just want more and more. It doesn't stop until your bank account is run dry.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nicholas ­ R.
Senior Member
Avatar
455 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Feb 23, 2011 11:00 |  #39

Mark_48 wrote in post #11898741 (external link)
While I may not hesitate to use Eclipse on most everything else you mentioned, I wouldn't use it on rubber. The Eclipse, if alcohol based will clean rubber well, but over time can dry out rubber making it hard and less resilient and prone to cracking. I'm saying this based on years of maintenance on tape decks and general knowledge that while alcohol is a good tape head cleaner, one never should use it on rubber drive parts, such as the rubber capstan pinch roller on a tape deck simply for the problems I had mentioned.
A cloth lightly dampened should be most adequate for rubber parts.

I clean the rubber seals maybe once or twice a year. No problems yet.

Nicholas
http://www.copperhilli​mages.com/index.php?pr​=galleries (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dickson918
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
152 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Feb 23, 2011 18:29 |  #40

cptrios wrote in post #11897667 (external link)
Dickson, where do you live? I'm personally in the "learn to live with dust in the viewfinder" camp, but there was a point right after I bought my 5d2 where I accidentally knocked the focusing screen out and wound up getting enough dust on the superimpose plate to seriously distract me while shooting. My local camera repair shop (in Arlington, MA) cleaned it and replaced the focusing screen for $50 total.

I bought it "used" here, the seller didn't mention it in his description, it wasn't one or two dusts, there are 5, or 6 in the center.. I just couldn't stand them.


Body:Canon EOS 50D, Panasonic Lumix LX5
Lenses: Canon EF-S 15-85mm, Sigma 30mm F1.4, Canon 50mm F/1.8 MK I, Tamron 70-300mm USD VC
Flash: YN468

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dickson918
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
152 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Feb 23, 2011 18:34 |  #41

PUREBRAD wrote in post #11897959 (external link)
Am I missing something here? 33 responses about how much cleaning should cost and how expensive the charge was. The first post identifies that not only a standard service was completed, but also that the grip was stuck on the camera. I would imagine that stuck grip removal is labor intensive and added significantly to the cost of the service charge.

No, the grip has additional cost of $50,
and it is simple to remove it, I was just lazy.
$180 is only for general cleaning and calibration......


Body:Canon EOS 50D, Panasonic Lumix LX5
Lenses: Canon EF-S 15-85mm, Sigma 30mm F1.4, Canon 50mm F/1.8 MK I, Tamron 70-300mm USD VC
Flash: YN468

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cfhjag
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Feb 2011
     
Feb 23, 2011 22:58 as a reply to  @ dickson918's post |  #42

I'm thinking about swabbing my sensor, haven't done it before so it seems a bit scary.

This is my sensor before and after a brush sweep, still a few things that seems to be stuck on there...

Should I go to a pro and get it done for $150+ or just get some swabs and do it myself? What could really happen? Must be hard to scratch the sensor using swabs right?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dickson918
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
152 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Feb 24, 2011 01:38 |  #43

cfhjag wrote in post #11903141 (external link)
I'm thinking about swabbing my sensor, haven't done it before so it seems a bit scary.

This is my sensor before and after a brush sweep, still a few things that seems to be stuck on there...

Should I go to a pro and get it done for $150+ or just get some swabs and do it myself? What could really happen? Must be hard to scratch the sensor using swabs right?

Local camera store quote me $45, and claimed they use microscope to make sure even the smallest dusts will be cleaned.


Body:Canon EOS 50D, Panasonic Lumix LX5
Lenses: Canon EF-S 15-85mm, Sigma 30mm F1.4, Canon 50mm F/1.8 MK I, Tamron 70-300mm USD VC
Flash: YN468

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cptrios
Goldmember
Avatar
1,744 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Boston, USA / Burgundy, France
     
Feb 24, 2011 14:23 |  #44

cfhjag wrote in post #11903141 (external link)
I'm thinking about swabbing my sensor, haven't done it before so it seems a bit scary.

This is my sensor before and after a brush sweep, still a few things that seems to be stuck on there...

Should I go to a pro and get it done for $150+ or just get some swabs and do it myself? What could really happen? Must be hard to scratch the sensor using swabs right?

Try to find a local shop. There's no way you should pay more than $50 for a cleaning.


Fuji X100 / Sony NEX-7 / Contax G 45mm f/2 / The ghosts of 3 Canon bodies past / A meagre amount of talent
My weak lil' 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
barryvj171
Member
Avatar
138 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Feb 28, 2011 04:37 |  #45

PWard wrote in post #11893660 (external link)
another note is sometimes the dust isn't all removed.

I had bought a brand new Canon 50mm f/1.2L lens, which was out of calibration right out of the box.

right out of the box there was a single spec of dust under the front element.

I sent it to Canon under warranty to calibrate it. their paperwork came back saying they calibrated, cleaned, and adjusted the lens.

it came back with a spec of dust behind the front element still.

I know several people with this lens all needing calibration from new.... Not good Canon !!


FREESTYLE PHOTOGRAPHY (external link)
1D MkIV | 5D MkII | 16-35/2.8L | 24-70/2.8[COLOR=Black]L | MP-E65/2.8 | 85/1.2L |
100 MacroL IS | 135/2L | 70-200/2.8L | 300/2.8L | 400/2.8L |
TC1.4L | 580EX II's | MT24-EX | ST-E2 | Pocket Wizards |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

14,007 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Oh Canon... Cleaning service cost $219?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Dannal01
818 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.