Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 28 Feb 2011 (Monday) 02:10
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which Option Would You Choose"
Canon 10-22 3.5-4.5 | Canon 24-105 4L | Sigma 30 1.4 | Canon 85 1.8
54
42.2%
Tokina 11-16 2.8 | Canon 17-55 2.8 | Sigma 30 1.4 | Canon 85 1.8
74
57.8%

128 voters, 128 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

POLL: which option would you choose...

 
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,272 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Likes: 364
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan
     
Feb 28, 2011 11:39 |  #16

TheRisingArms wrote in post #11927745 (external link)
If you go with option 1, you get the complete range from 10-105mm.
One of the few reasons to not go with a 24-105 on a crop body is that 24 isn't particularly wide. You've solved that problem with a Canon 10-22.

The problem is, if you tend to shoot more on the wide side, you will end up changing lenses a lot more often with this combo than with a 17-55mm "walkaround" zoom.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,381 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3282
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Feb 28, 2011 11:41 |  #17

nikmar08 wrote in post #11927761 (external link)
Edit: Focal length shortage on the longer end can always be made up for by foot-zooming forwards.

not always...


i voted option 1...gives you plenty of range, and then the fast primes can be used when you want low-light


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,243 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 311
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Feb 28, 2011 12:05 |  #18

I like option 1 better for the longer focal length.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon Pixma PRO-10 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,256 posts
Likes: 86
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Feb 28, 2011 12:15 |  #19

Option #3... "None of the above".

For candid photos, street photography, travel, family shots with a crop camera I'd get:

Tokina 12-24/4 ($500)
Canon 28-135 IS (buy used, they are going for under $250 on my local Craigslist)

Two zooms, well under $1000.... a simple, lightweight travel and general purpose kit. It's not a big deal to change lenses.

Sure, I could combine an 11-16 with a 17-55, but what about the useful range from 56mm to 135mm? And is f2.8 all that important on an UWA lens that's nearly always going to be stopped down? Canon 10-22 is another option, but the last I looked it's selling for $850 (by the time you get the lens hood, too).

But I also like to use primes... especially for street shooting, candids and portraits... and would want:

28/1.8, 50/1.4 and 85/1.8.

Those three lenses can be bought for $400 to $450 apiece, or might be found used for possibly $1000 for all three.

Circular Polarizers in 58, 72 and 77mm sizes, a set of macro extension tubes and a 430EX flash or two and I'd be pretty much ready to head out on the road.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII(x2), 7D(x2) & other cameras. 10-22mm, Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS (x2), 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, studio strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link) - ZENFOLIO (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nikmar08
Goldmember
Avatar
1,852 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Bangalore, India
     
Feb 28, 2011 13:42 |  #20

DreDaze wrote in post #11929712 (external link)
not always...


i voted option 1...gives you plenty of range, and then the fast primes can be used when you want low-light

True, not always. I should have stated the context to be the difference between 85mm and 105mm.


____O
__( \ \_
((_)/ ((_)
Nikhil | Gear List & Market Feedback | Flickr (external link)
Support POTN by donating here: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cherrymoon
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Feb 28, 2011 14:15 |  #21

Voted option 1, just because I had one part of this kit with 10-22 + 24-105 + 85. I loved 10-22 + 24-105, very versatile.

However, sometimes I'm always dreaming about the one lens set-up : an APS-C + 17-55. IS + 2.8 + ideal range + IQ : what else !?

The 24-105 give me a big part of this dream on FF, just missing the 2.8 ?!


5D² 40 pancake | 50/1.4 | 85L II | 135L | 16-35L IS | 24-105L | 70-200 f2.8 L IS II and a TT bike
Complete Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thrash_273
Goldmember
Avatar
4,901 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 77
Joined Aug 2007
Location: baltimore
     
Feb 28, 2011 14:16 |  #22

option 1 is my pick


Ben
flickr (external link)
Positive feedbacks, More, More,More
a6000 | Pentax SMC 50 1.7 | Rok 8 2.8 Fe | Sony 50 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pilsburypie
Goldmember
Avatar
1,125 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2009
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Feb 28, 2011 14:17 |  #23

For general hobby photography (much like myself) when strating of with lenses I have gone my way..... getting 2 zooms that cover pretty wide to a decent zoom length for a bit of close up when out and about. So my suggestion for your crop 60D is the brilliant 17-55 and a version of the 70-200 is - either f4is or f2.8is. When you have this versility of focal lengths, you can then decide if you want an UWA or what fast prime you'd like.

Unless you are sure on the lens lineup you want, getting all that at once risks having 1 or 2 lenses you hardly use..... Anyhow, if you do go with one of your packages it will be a fun day when the package arrives!


Mark
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ofafeather
Senior Member
645 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Ancramdale, NY
     
Feb 28, 2011 14:27 |  #24

The 17-55 IS is probably the #1 recommended lens for a crop body. That said, I really feel limited in that focal length. I have a 17-55 and recently bought a 24-105 which I LOVE! It stays on my camera most of the time, except when I want something longer.

For one thing, it would be the only lens in your line-up that is weather sealed to complement the weather sealing on the 60D. That might not be a deal breaker but it's nice to have. Another thing is that if you have the 85 and 30 fast lenses you really have a decent range for wide apertures.

Consider the Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 for the wide end. It's a great lens as well and a lot less than the Canon. The savings can be used to pick up a flash.


Canon 7D, 5D Mark II and some Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bowenbee
Member
93 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: MD
     
Feb 28, 2011 14:53 |  #25

Option 2; big fan of the Tokina and all those lenses have fast apertures.


Eos 7D | 15-85mm | 50mm f/1.8 | 70-200 F/4 IS L | 430EX |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KVN ­ Photo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,940 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
     
Feb 28, 2011 17:16 |  #26

1st choice, because the FL, you do need that longer FL for some close candid shots, and for travelling I used to have a good light, so aperture is not really necessary, at least for me. My ususal setting is at f/11 1/250-500 ISO100, and I change it only if I want to gain special effect.


X-Pro1 + 18-55 f/2.8-4 OIS + 55-200 f/3.8-4.5 OIS
TS-E 24 f/3.5L II + XF 35 f/1.4 + XF 56 f/1.2
Sony RX100 II + G12
Travel the world!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DiMAn0684
Goldmember
Avatar
1,933 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Boston, MA
     
Feb 28, 2011 17:34 as a reply to  @ KVN Photo's post |  #27

voted for #2 as 24mm is too narrow for a general walkaround lens in my opinion.


Canon 5D MkII | Canon 16-35mm f/4 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM | Canon 24-105mm f/4 | Tamron 70-300mm VC | Canon 430EX II | Benro A2682TB1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Supersignet
Senior Member
504 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Feb 28, 2011 20:12 |  #28

How about the Sigma 8-16, Sigma 17-50 OS,Sigma 30 1.4 and Canon 85 1.8

Or with close to the same budget

Sigma 10-20, Sigma 17-50 OS, Sigma 30 1.4, Canon 85 1.8 and 430 EX II


Canon 5Dii, Sigma 24mm f1.8, Sigma 50mm f1.4, Sigma 85mm f1.4, Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX Macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 Macro, Canon 135 f2L, Zenitar 16mm f2.8 fish eye (on the way)
A pile of ocf gear and modifiers.
http://picasaweb.googl​e.com/mike.s.gibson (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Photo_Rebel
Senior Member
Avatar
527 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Philly by way of Chicago
     
Mar 02, 2011 10:33 |  #29

I chose #2 for its apertures and the fact that the 17-55 is the best lens for a crop body; I know, it was my favorite (still missing it) lens before going FF. The 17-55 is plenty enough in terms of walk-around use since it equates to 27mm-88mm on your 60D. The 24-105mm is a great lens, but you’ll find that the wide end won’t be wide enough as most members have already alluded to – about 38mm on a crop. You’ll be switching lenses often if you need a wider shot. Good luck!


Bodies: T4i : 5DIV : Sony A6000
Glass: 15-85 IS : 50 1.8 : Zeiss Touit 12mm 2.8 : Zeiss Sonnar 24mm 1.8 : Zeiss Sonnar 55mm 1.8 : 16-35L III : 24L II : 35L II : 50L :
85L II : 100L Macro : 135L
P&S: S95

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x.pozhr
Goldmember
Avatar
4,828 posts
Gallery: 323 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 808
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Chandler, Arizona
     
Mar 02, 2011 11:50 as a reply to  @ Photo_Rebel's post |  #30

Option # 2. It opens up new possibilities for you to shoot in low light.


flickr (external link)
Gear List + Marketplace Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

4,326 views & 0 likes for this thread
POLL: which option would you choose...
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Cmjewell
841 guests, 234 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.