hah, I just found another stealer: http://www.armadaofblogs.info/
#1 image there of girl, is mine again!
and also #11 omg... I can't believe I'm so popular
+1
and 1 more: http://www.google.com …sp=30&ved=1t:429,r:7,s:30
Mar 02, 2011 15:58 | #16 hah, I just found another stealer: http://www.armadaofblogs.info/ Photography Tips
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 02, 2011 16:01 | #17 p.s. people who don't believe they are mine, here uncroped versions: Photography Tips
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bang Bang Boy Goldmember ![]() 1,347 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: South Africa More info | Mar 02, 2011 19:14 | #18 F that guy, mailbomb the douche. Terrorism aside I really hope you sort it out and get your picture removed from his site. You own it and he shouldn't display it like that. Lots of old stuff but hey I am a student
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 02, 2011 19:30 | #19 Bang Bang Boy wrote in post #11945137 ![]() F that guy, mailbomb the douche. Terrorism aside I really hope you sort it out and get your picture removed from his site. You own it and he shouldn't display it like that. Exactly... Ann Robinson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Mar 02, 2011 21:20 | #20 Ah, so you do have a website. Thanks for sharing. Try watermarking over the center of the image next time instead of leaving it off or put in the lower right corner where it is easily cropped out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Macris Member 154 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: NJ More info | Mar 02, 2011 21:32 | #21 lakewood is approx. an hour away from me; if there's anything you'd want to type of and email me i could mail it to his address. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
onick Member ![]() 204 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2010 Location: TX, USA More info | Mar 04, 2011 06:53 | #22 sandro9mm wrote in post #11944005 ![]() it's simple, "photography" is high ranking keyword. There is another of my image, girls face, #6 in google images, and it gives insane traffic. If I took my place with the gun image #2, I would get more traffic. got it? images are from here: http://www.sandrophoto.com/2007/11/24/photo-headers/ ![]() unfortunately google has yet to scan the content of pictures, its crawler scans a site and collect the meta tags, pictures description given. so even if he removes your pictures and replace it another picture with the same file name and description, he will still come on top of search result for the keyword "photography". Canon EOS 6D II | Canon EOS 550D | 18-55mm IS | 55-250mm STM | Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 | 35mm f2.0 IS | 50mm f1.8 | 135mm f2.0 L | YN-568EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 05, 2011 10:51 | #23 I have had many photo's hotlinked to other sites. I took a picture of my Treo 650 smart phone years ago and it ended up in the product catalog section of 4 wireless resellers over seas. What I did was change the image to a not so safe for work image. Because they hotlinked it my image was on their page. I was not heavily opposed to them using these pictures they were just shots of my phone that I posted to a blog post review I did on the phone. What I did not like was they were leeching bandwidth. Canon 6D - 24-70L 2.8, 24-100L 4.0, Samyung 82mm 1.4, EF 70-200 f4L IS - 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Velorium Senior Member 493 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2010 More info | Mar 05, 2011 21:33 | #24 You could also try e-mailing Google and see if they'll do anything about it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kjonnnn Goldmember 1,216 posts Likes: 148 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Having that photo stolen probably has nothing to do with any perceived loss of traffic. Looking at your site meta data is just telling. While they dont strictly rely on keywords any more, your OVER use of the Photography and its variations has probably been your detriment. "description" content="In search of information about famous photographers from yesteryear or today? Be awed and inspired by our featured collection of the worlds most renown photographers." /><meta name="keywords" content="famous photographer,famous portrait photographers,famous fashion photographers,names of famous photographers,most famous photographers,famous sports photographers,famous photographers and their works,famous photographs,famous female photographers,famous landscape photographers,famous nature photographers,list of famous photographers,world famous photographers,famous war photographers,most famous photographs,world famous photographs,national geographic photographers,biography of a photographer" Besides watermarking, you might want to put your copyright information in the photograph meta data. While it can be removed, most stealers don't think of or know how to do that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Mar 06, 2011 08:45 | #26 onick wrote in post #11953732 ![]() unfortunately google has yet to scan the content of pictures, its crawler scans a site and collect the meta tags, pictures description given. so even if he removes your pictures and replace it another picture with the same file name and description, he will still come on top of search result for the keyword "photography". to get on top of google's search result you have to work on optimizing your website for search engine, in short do some SEO works on your site. i bet that is why that site came on top. also while optimizing targeting a key word like "gun photography" will be more effective than a broad keyword like "photography". i am sure here there are some seo gurus who can explain the process better. All very well put. An image coming up often on one person/company's website will not get the same search hit results with that same image on a different website. Showing up in web searches is not just the image and the search tags associated with that. And how popular a website is, contributes to its ranking with Google. So putting a popular image on a low SEO ranking/Google search return website (even with good SEO search works) will not make that low ranked website jump near the top in google searches for those same words!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
So how does one go about and scan the net to find out if your photos is stolen or someone is using your photos? Yes, you can call me Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Todd Lambert I don't like titles ![]() More info | Mar 06, 2011 11:34 | #28 |
RAW-Shooter Senior Member ![]() 921 posts Likes: 102 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Altamonte Springs, FL More info | One other thing I noticed is that the OP's pictures on the web site have zero meta data - no copyright nor owner ship info embedded. Also, you make it way to easy for those crooks to download your photos for their own illegal purposes. BoKo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1763 guests, 97 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |