Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 01 Mar 2011 (Tuesday) 16:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

copyright violation!

 
sandro9mm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,718 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Italy, Milan
     
Mar 02, 2011 15:58 |  #16

hah, I just found another stealer: http://www.armadaofblo​gs.info/ (external link)

#1 image there of girl, is mine again!

and also #11 omg... I can't believe I'm so popular :D

+1
and 1 more: http://www.google.com …sp=30&ved=1t:42​9,r:7,s:30 (external link)


Photography Tips (external link) - Learn photography now!
Famous photographers (external link) - Video Interviews, photos, biography
My gear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandro9mm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,718 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Italy, Milan
     
Mar 02, 2011 16:01 |  #17

p.s. people who don't believe they are mine, here uncroped versions:
http://www.sandrophoto​.com/2007/10/27/georgi​a/ (external link)
http://www.sandrophoto​.com/2007/10/24/black-and-white/ (external link)

yep, from 2007, long ago...


Photography Tips (external link) - Learn photography now!
Famous photographers (external link) - Video Interviews, photos, biography
My gear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bang ­ Bang ­ Boy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,347 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: South Africa
     
Mar 02, 2011 19:14 |  #18

F that guy, mailbomb the douche. Terrorism aside I really hope you sort it out and get your picture removed from his site. You own it and he shouldn't display it like that.


Lots of old stuff but hey I am a student
Photojournalist in Johannesburg.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karobinson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Alaska
     
Mar 02, 2011 19:30 |  #19

Bang Bang Boy wrote in post #11945137 (external link)
F that guy, mailbomb the douche. Terrorism aside I really hope you sort it out and get your picture removed from his site. You own it and he shouldn't display it like that.

Exactly...


Ann Robinson:)
My Gear: bunch of stuff;....some I love ... some I hate ... some I can't live without..loving my 5d3...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HappySnapper90
Cream of the Crop
5,145 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Mar 02, 2011 21:20 |  #20

Ah, so you do have a website. Thanks for sharing. Try watermarking over the center of the image next time instead of leaving it off or put in the lower right corner where it is easily cropped out.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Macris
Member
154 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: NJ
     
Mar 02, 2011 21:32 |  #21

lakewood is approx. an hour away from me; if there's anything you'd want to type of and email me i could mail it to his address.


flickr (external link)
Canon T2i | 50mm 1.8 | 70-200mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
onick
Member
Avatar
204 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2010
Location: TX, USA
     
Mar 04, 2011 06:53 |  #22

sandro9mm wrote in post #11944005 (external link)
it's simple, "photography" is high ranking keyword. There is another of my image, girls face, #6 in google images, and it gives insane traffic. If I took my place with the gun image #2, I would get more traffic. got it?

images are from here:
http://www.sandrophoto​.com/2007/11/24/photo-headers/ (external link)

unfortunately google has yet to scan the content of pictures, its crawler scans a site and collect the meta tags, pictures description given. so even if he removes your pictures and replace it another picture with the same file name and description, he will still come on top of search result for the keyword "photography".

to get on top of google's search result you have to work on optimizing your website for search engine, in short do some SEO works on your site. i bet that is why that site came on top. also while optimizing targeting a key word like "gun photography" will be more effective than a broad keyword like "photography".

i am sure here there are some seo gurus who can explain the process better.


Canon EOS 6D II | Canon EOS 550D | 18-55mm IS | 55-250mm STM | Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 | 35mm f2.0 IS | 50mm f1.8 | 135mm f2.0 L | YN-568EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fizzler
Member
172 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 34
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Goodyear, AZ
     
Mar 05, 2011 10:51 |  #23

I have had many photo's hotlinked to other sites. I took a picture of my Treo 650 smart phone years ago and it ended up in the product catalog section of 4 wireless resellers over seas. What I did was change the image to a not so safe for work image. Because they hotlinked it my image was on their page. I was not heavily opposed to them using these pictures they were just shots of my phone that I posted to a blog post review I did on the phone. What I did not like was they were leeching bandwidth.

Once you post something on the internet and other folks like it.. they will use it and abuse it.


Canon 6D - 24-70L 2.8, 24-100L 4.0, Samyung 82mm 1.4, EF 70-200 f4L IS - 50mm 1.8
Canon 7D Tokina - 11-16mm -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Velorium
Senior Member
493 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2010
     
Mar 05, 2011 21:33 |  #24

You could also try e-mailing Google and see if they'll do anything about it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kjonnnn
Goldmember
1,216 posts
Likes: 148
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Mar 05, 2011 21:43 as a reply to  @ post 11944005 |  #25

Having that photo stolen probably has nothing to do with any perceived loss of traffic. Looking at your site meta data is just telling. While they dont strictly rely on keywords any more, your OVER use of the Photography and its variations has probably been your detriment.

"description" content="In search of information about famous photographers from yesteryear or today? Be awed and inspired by our featured collection of the worlds most renown photographers." /><meta name="keywords" content="famous photographer,famous portrait photographers,famous fashion photographers,names of famous photographers,most famous photographers,famous sports photographers,famous photographers and their works,famous photographs,famous female photographers,famous landscape photographers,famous nature photographers,list of famous photographers,world famous photographers,famous war photographers,most famous photographs,world famous photographs,national geographic photographers,biograph​y of a photographer"

Besides watermarking, you might want to put your copyright information in the photograph meta data. While it can be removed, most stealers don't think of or know how to do that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HappySnapper90
Cream of the Crop
5,145 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Mar 06, 2011 08:45 |  #26

onick wrote in post #11953732 (external link)
unfortunately google has yet to scan the content of pictures, its crawler scans a site and collect the meta tags, pictures description given. so even if he removes your pictures and replace it another picture with the same file name and description, he will still come on top of search result for the keyword "photography".

to get on top of google's search result you have to work on optimizing your website for search engine, in short do some SEO works on your site. i bet that is why that site came on top. also while optimizing targeting a key word like "gun photography" will be more effective than a broad keyword like "photography".

i am sure here there are some seo gurus who can explain the process better.

All very well put. An image coming up often on one person/company's website will not get the same search hit results with that same image on a different website. Showing up in web searches is not just the image and the search tags associated with that. And how popular a website is, contributes to its ranking with Google. So putting a popular image on a low SEO ranking/Google search return website (even with good SEO search works) will not make that low ranked website jump near the top in google searches for those same words! :cool:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkadrum
Goldmember
Avatar
2,382 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 313
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Outdoors/Indoor
     
Mar 06, 2011 09:10 as a reply to  @ HappySnapper90's post |  #27

So how does one go about and scan the net to find out if your photos is stolen or someone is using your photos?


Yes, you can call me Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Mar 06, 2011 11:34 |  #28

http://www.tineye.com/ (external link)

That's one way.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RAW-Shooter
Senior Member
Avatar
921 posts
Likes: 102
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Altamonte Springs, FL
     
Mar 06, 2011 11:53 as a reply to  @ Todd Lambert's post |  #29

One other thing I noticed is that the OP's pictures on the web site have zero meta data - no copyright nor owner ship info embedded. Also, you make it way to easy for those crooks to download your photos for their own illegal purposes.

If I were you I would pursue legal action - if you can prove ownership of those photos that is. Again, you may have a problem here, because you published them in a public domain without copyright info embedded.

Just my two cents.


BoKo
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Oly 12-60mm f/2.8-4 SWD | Oly 40-150 f/2.8 PRO | Oly 300mm f/4 PRO | and a bunch of good old manual lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkadrum
Goldmember
Avatar
2,382 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 313
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Outdoors/Indoor
     
Mar 06, 2011 16:29 |  #30

Todd Lambert wrote in post #11966631 (external link)
http://www.tineye.com/ (external link)

That's one way.

Thanks.


Yes, you can call me Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,093 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
copyright violation!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1630 guests, 99 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.