Yay or nay on this watermark design?

Sorry, I was unsure where I should post this.. but I do baby/child photography. A friend designed the logo for me.. what do you think? I am unsure about the butterfly.. I originally wanted a bird but it seems like a lot of child photographers use birds so maybe the butterfly is better..

I like it

Id like to see it on a photo, but I like it very much.

I like it too. As pointed out though it'll be better judged on a photo

I'd love to see it on a photo....

also, you really want to make sure that it's on a transparent background or one that's opacity is fairly light so that you can see the image through teh watermark

I like the design

The design seems fine to me but I think

• you should hold out for the bird you wanted
  
• the bird should be facing left to draw attention to rather than away from your name
  
• since you are applying it to your work, the "PHOTOGRAPHY" is unnecessary. How many painters sign their work with the descriptor "PAINTING"?
  

Its too busy.

I like it. I agree the butterfly or bird should be facing into the photo though.

Ah ok I'm going to use it just as a header for my website and blog.. but it doesn't look right as a watermark. Will probably just use a simple font and my site address for a watermark, if I need it.

Have two versions - one where the text is all white, and one where the text is all black - keep the butterfly in color and maybe the text photo can have color. Way too much color imo as it sits right now.

Use versions depending on the image.

I like it just the way it is.

gonzogolf wrote in post #11996287
Its too busy.

my thoughts too

the font is to thin for a effective watermark

I like the design but the loops down below seem busy. Just my 2 cents.