Incredible Hulk? Ooooh, Japan.
I see what you did there... 
IndecentExposure Goldmember  3,402 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Austin, Texas More info | Incredible Hulk? Ooooh, Japan. - James -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fricks Cream of the Crop is, in fact, a title  More info | at the beach with it. Here is the link to some of the pictures with it 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FCMR Member  167 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: The Netherlands More info | when I look at this ^^^ I ask myself ,How much weight/torque can a body actualy handle ? 1D classic (2x) ~ 1Ds classic ~ 7D ~ S95
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop"  57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Mar 25, 2011 20:13 | #5119 FCMR wrote in post #12093700  when I look at this I ask myself ,How much weight can a body actualy handle ? Good Point... Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fricks Cream of the Crop is, in fact, a title More info | Mar 25, 2011 20:31 | #5120 To tell you the truth I don't know. I had my 24-105 attached to it and switched to take a few pics with the 70-200 and did not take off the tripod mount off the body.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheRan Goldmember 1,555 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Hertford, England More info | It's not like he has a 600mm f/4 on there, I'm sure it'd take more than 1.5kg to rip the lens mount off. Although it would give better balance, I'm guessing he was probably switching between lenses and there's no QR plate on the 70-200mm's tripod foot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FCMR Member 167 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: The Netherlands More info | Yeah well I wouldn´t even consider it even if it was for only a few seconds 1D classic (2x) ~ 1Ds classic ~ 7D ~ S95
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheRan Goldmember 1,555 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Hertford, England More info | Mar 25, 2011 21:35 | #5123 FCMR wrote in post #12093861 Yeah well I wouldn´t even consider it even if it was for only a few seconds You do realise your gripped 7D and 1Ds only weigh about 200 grams less than the 70-200mm f/2.8, and the gripped 50D about 100 grams less than them? And that's the weight without batteries, chuck some in and add something like a flash and you're putting even more stress on the lens mount than laselects06, as would pushing down slightly on the body.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SaxonIV Senior Member  768 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Alabama More info | Just recieved my 1D MKII. I'm so impressed. I purchased it from KEH in BGN condition, only 115k on the shutter. Also picked up a PRISTINE 50mm f/1.8 MKI. I can't find a mark on the lens.  Canon 1D MKII w/ 50mm f/1.8 MKI by McClammaIV, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jericobot Cream of the Crop  5,128 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: preppingforthetrumpets More info | I had that exact combo last summer. Really fun rig to do walk around shooting α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 25, 2011 22:17 | #5126 SaxonIV wrote in post #12094246 Just recieved my 1D MKII. I'm so impressed. I purchased it from KEH in BGN condition, only 115k on the shutter. Also picked up a PRISTINE 50mm f/1.8 MKI. I can't find a mark on the lens. Canon 1D MKII w/ 50mm f/1.8 MKI by McClammaIV, on FlickrYou're going to love it! I don't think I could go back to using a non-1D body anymore. It just spoiled me. They're amazing cameras. α7R IV | Σ 24-70 f/2.8 | Σ 150-600 f/5-6.3 | Σ 14-24 f/2.8 | 1D MkIII | 430EX II | 24-70 f/2.8L | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 25, 2011 22:23 | #5127 SaxonIV wrote in post #12094246 I purchased it from KEH in BGN condition Looks like you got quite the bargain... Was always a little iffy about BGN, but that looks great... Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!"  More info | Mar 25, 2011 22:58 | #5128 GuitarFreak wrote in post #12094283 You're going to love it! I don't think I could go back to using a non-1D body anymore. It just spoiled me. They're amazing cameras. I'm starting to want a 1Ds... Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Matoch Senior Member  633 posts Joined Sep 2005 Location: Edmonton, Alberta More info | Mar 25, 2011 23:09 | #5129 The Ran wrote in post #12094061 You do realise your gripped 7D and 1Ds only weigh about 200 grams less than the 70-200mm f/2.8, and the gripped 50D about 100 grams less than them? And that's the weight without batteries, chuck some in and add something like a flash and you're putting even more stress on the lens mount than laselects06, as would pushing down slightly on the body. I honestly don't know how hard it is on the actual camera however the big difference is going to be where the pressure is on the camera. The weight of the camera would have most of the pressure going vertically on the camera mount. The length of the lens and the weight means it's going to pull away from the camera. I would expect that the vertical pressure would be less of a concern then the other.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dandan1 Goldmember 1,223 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Silicon Valley, CA More info | GuitarFreak wrote in post #12094283 You're going to love it! I don't think I could go back to using a non-1D body anymore. It just spoiled me. They're amazing cameras. I keep saying that and saying that... and I too am spoiled KenjiS wrote in post #12094510 I'm starting to want a 1Ds... You better get one soon, the lust will just keep on growing and keep you up at night until you get one
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1449 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
