Thankfully, I've got a tripod arriving this week


Nature's tripod.
Glad to see I'm not the only one who has done this before...

JayCeeImages Goldmember 1,544 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: CA More info | Mar 27, 2011 12:43 | #5161 mrstaton wrote in post #12102315 Thankfully, I've got a tripod arriving this week ![]() ![]() Nature's tripod.
Nobody cares about your gear list...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CameraMan Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 27, 2011 14:14 | #5162 mrstaton wrote in post #12102315 Thankfully, I've got a tripod arriving this week ![]() ![]() Nature's tripod. Never thought of that before. Pretty ingenious. Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FuturamaJSP Goldmember 2,227 posts Likes: 82 Joined Oct 2009 More info | Mar 27, 2011 14:42 | #5163 mansalim wrote in post #12095665 btw the 1dsmkIII LCD really awful.. even 50D has better LCD.. Well duh! It's the same LCD as those on the 40D and XSI They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DannyWOT Senior Member 322 posts Likes: 25 Joined Aug 2010 Location: DFW, Texas More info | Mar 27, 2011 14:58 | #5164 mrstaton wrote in post #12102315 Thankfully, I've got a tripod arriving this week ![]() ![]() Nature's tripod. Hahaha that is awesome Canon 60D-not gripped, a couple lenses, a couple bags, a flash and my trigger finger
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | Mar 27, 2011 15:15 | #5165 mrstaton wrote in post #12102315 Thankfully, I've got a tripod arriving this week ![]() ![]() Nature's tripod. Its not level -twitch- Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MPCman Senior Member 863 posts Likes: 30 Joined May 2008 Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands More info | Mar 27, 2011 15:32 | #5166 KenjiS wrote in post #12103614 Its not level -twitch- The camera in the picture or the camera that took the shot? 7D, EOS-M, 100-400 L, 15-85, Tokina 11-16 2.8, EF-M 11-22, 55-200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jericobot Cream of the Crop 5,128 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: preppingforthetrumpets More info | Good check α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gaze III.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | Mar 27, 2011 17:55 | #5169 mrstaton wrote in post #12104454 I know it wasn't level, it kept slipping off, no matter how long I tinkered with it for! Still, the result wasn't too bad, even if I did nearly fall over in running through snow from the tree to get on the bench before it fired: Gaze III.
Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NorCalNomad Goldmember 1,074 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: San Fransisco More info | Mar 28, 2011 01:38 | #5170 The Ran wrote in post #12101305 Although the Rebels (and 60D) are plastic bodies they have metal subframes (steel I believe) so they're still plenty strong. As for that photo, it's probably just the result of a fall, if I remember rightly the photog actually landed on the gear. yes but that metal subframe does not extend to the mount. I had a 70-200 2.8 on my XS, was picking it up by the body instead of the lens and it did put a little bit of a dent into the mount. ...screw listing gear,it just sets up preconceived notions...but if you must link
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jericobot Cream of the Crop 5,128 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: preppingforthetrumpets More info | Wow, those rebel's can't take much of a beating α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rmedina8804 Member 226 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: San diego Ca More info | Mar 28, 2011 02:54 | #5172 musso wrote in post #12041430 here is my 5DII W/ 70-200 2.8 on RRS BH-55 & Gitzo GT3531S Gitzo GS5121LVL. wow.. my holy grail... 5d II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 28, 2011 08:36 | #5173 KenjiS wrote in post #12104484 Could be worse http://www.youtube.com …=player_detailpage#t=447s Poor 5DII and 24-105 I cringe every time I see that episode α7R IV | Σ 24-70 f/2.8 | Σ 150-600 f/5-6.3 | Σ 14-24 f/2.8 | 1D MkIII | 430EX II | 24-70 f/2.8L | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember 4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Mar 28, 2011 08:57 | #5174 NorCalNomad wrote in post #12106864 yes but that metal subframe does not extend to the mount. I had a 70-200 2.8 on my XS, was picking it up by the body instead of the lens and it did put a little bit of a dent into the mount. Do you have any links to back that up? -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
-Strike- Member 171 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: Ontario, Canada More info | Taken with a cheap Lumix P&S. 60D | EF-S 18-135 | Slik Pro 580DX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1449 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||