JustinRageth Senior Member  636 posts Joined Dec 2010 Location: SE Wisconsin More info | Apr 14, 2011 13:43 | #1 I love my 70-200mm f4 L...i love how it focuses and its sharpness. What lens could I get to replace my kit lens? I know that most will recommend the 17-55 lens, but that at $1000+ is out of my price range. Any suggestions? This lens would be used mainly as a general purpose/walk around lens. T4i Gripped, Sigma 17-70mm, 70-200 f/4L, 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nepali Senior Member  970 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Dallas, TX More info | Apr 14, 2011 13:48 | #2 JustinRageth wrote in post #12221829  I love my 70-200mm f4 L...i love how it focuses and its sharpness. What lens could I get to replace my kit lens? I know that most will recommend the 17-55 lens, but that at $1000+ is out of my price range. Any suggestions? This lens would be used mainly as a general purpose/walk around lens. Do you need IS? If not, checkout Tamron 17-50 f/2.8!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Brendo666 Goldmember  1,538 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Renton, WA More info | Apr 14, 2011 13:49 | #3 |
Nightdiver13 Unabashed nerd!  2,272 posts Likes: 38 Joined May 2010 Location: Bigfoot Country More info | Apr 14, 2011 13:51 | #4 It's still pretty up there in cost, but the 15-85 is the tits. Maybe wait for a used one to pop up on the sale boards to shave $100-$150 off the cost. — Neil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 14, 2011 13:54 | #5 nepali wrote in post #12221862 Do you need IS? If not, checkout Tamron 17-50 f/2.8! IS isnt incredibly important, my longer lens doesnt have it T4i Gripped, Sigma 17-70mm, 70-200 f/4L, 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 14, 2011 13:55 | #6 Brendo666 wrote in post #12221877 Canon 17-55IS USM? Ya that one is a little too expensive T4i Gripped, Sigma 17-70mm, 70-200 f/4L, 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Brendo666 Goldmember 1,538 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Renton, WA More info | Apr 14, 2011 13:59 | #7 JustinRageth wrote in post #12221917 Ya that one is a little too expensive Just have to throw it out there. Hear great things about the Tamron, both VC and Non-VC. Also heard some good things about the sigma equivalent. -Brendan B.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yourdoinitwrong Goldmember  2,394 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: Indiana More info | Haven't checked prices on all these but here would be my choices besides the 17-55: 5D4 w/BG-E20, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, Sigma 50 f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 14, 2011 14:08 | #9 nepali wrote in post #12221862 Do you need IS? If not, checkout Tamron 17-50 f/2.8! Are these what you are talking about? T4i Gripped, Sigma 17-70mm, 70-200 f/4L, 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 14, 2011 14:09 | #10 yourdoinitwrong wrote in post #12221964 Haven't checked prices on all these but here would be my choices besides the 17-55: Canon 15-85 Tamron 17-50 (VC & non VC versions) Sigma 17-50 Sigma 17-70 Nice thing about the Tamron and Sigma lenses is the constant f/2.8 aperture. is this the 17-70 you speak of? T4i Gripped, Sigma 17-70mm, 70-200 f/4L, 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 29 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Apr 14, 2011 14:10 | #11 JustinRageth wrote in post #12222005 Are these what you are talking about? http://cgi.ebay.com …em27ba3a0fad#ht_490wt_530 http://cgi.ebay.com …refresh=true#ht_500wt_922 yes, but be careful with those ebay "deals" - shipping $50 !
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yourdoinitwrong Goldmember 2,394 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: Indiana More info | Apr 14, 2011 14:12 | #12 JustinRageth wrote in post #12222017 is this the 17-70 you speak of? http://cgi.ebay.com …m20b856ba1c#ht_500wt_1156 Yep. Didn't mean to include that as a constant f/2.8 though. Here are a couple of reviews on it: 5D4 w/BG-E20, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, Sigma 50 f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 14, 2011 14:13 | #13 ya just looking for the general lens...there are so many different versions out there with crazy letters T4i Gripped, Sigma 17-70mm, 70-200 f/4L, 50mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bokehlicious Senior Member  809 posts Joined Jan 2011 More info | Apr 14, 2011 14:23 | #14 If you don't need IS and want to pay less, Tamron 17-50 non VC, if you want even better IQ and IS, Sigma 17-50 OS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Velorium Senior Member 493 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2010 More info | Apr 14, 2011 14:32 | #15 Bokehlicious wrote in post #12222099 If you don't need IS and want to pay less, Tamron 17-50 non VC, if you want even better IQ and IS, Sigma 17-50 OS. This is what I'd recommend if you're set on getting a constant f/2.8. If you don't care then the Sigma 17-70 and Canon 15-85 are good choices.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is andrewszoporyphotography 903 guests, 283 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
