I really want a 16-35..
Zerimar Goldmember  3,529 posts Likes: 267 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info | I really want a 16-35.. Rick Rose - Add me!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Apr 20, 2011 02:56 | #5417 Zerimar wrote in post #12257972  I really want a 16-35.. The 16-35 will work nicely on those bodies you have.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Zerimar Goldmember 3,529 posts Likes: 267 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info | Apr 20, 2011 02:58 | #5418 I've borrowed one from a friend too.. and agree... I just can't spend that kind of money on one of those now though Rick Rose - Add me!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CircuitR Senior Member  787 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | Apr 20, 2011 03:49 | #5419 LowriderS10 wrote in post #12257761 Me and my girlfriend... 1D Mark III and 16-35L II My friend shot this in Jinhae, South Korea with a half-frame Diana on an old expired roll of Kodak 400.
Is it me, or does that hood look like it's not on properly? 5D mkII | 35L | 16-35mm F4 L IS | 50mm f1.4 USM | 135L |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1DCLICKER Member  202 posts Joined Mar 2011 More info | Apr 20, 2011 04:32 | #5420 CircuitR wrote in post #12258076 Is it me, or does that hood look like it's not on properly? its reflection on the uper side, makes it look twisted but if you see the bottom of the "Petal" its normal, i see what you mean though
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jericobot Cream of the Crop  5,128 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: preppingforthetrumpets More info | Home brew hood α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowriderS10 Cream of the Crop  10,170 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Korea / Canada More info | Apr 20, 2011 19:49 | #5422 Zerimar wrote in post #12257972 I really want a 16-35.. Do it. It took me a LONG time to work up to this lens, but it was well worth the wait and the saving. It's not perfect, but it's probably the best UWA for the bodies you have -=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowriderS10 Cream of the Crop 10,170 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Korea / Canada More info | Apr 20, 2011 19:51 | #5423 CircuitR wrote in post #12258076 Is it me, or does that hood look like it's not on properly? It's on properly and it's not a home brew hood, it's the factory Canon hood. it's a pretty shallow but wide hood, and from this angle the top right corner of it looks like it's a petal that sticks out, but it's not, it's just the corner from an odd angle. -=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember  4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | LowriderS10 wrote in post #12257761 Me and my girlfriend... 1D Mark III and 16-35L II After staring at the camera for so long I kept looking around for a girlfriend. Never found her LowriderS10 wrote in post #12262759 Do it. It took me a LONG time to work up to this lens, but it was well worth the wait and the saving. It's not perfect, but it's probably the best UWA for the bodies you have  I'm loving my 17-40. I'm trying to convince myself that I need a 24-70 for my film body, but I haven't been able to (yet!) -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CircuitR Senior Member 787 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | Apr 21, 2011 03:37 | #5425 LowriderS10 wrote in post #12262769 It's on properly and it's not a home brew hood, it's the factory Canon hood. it's a pretty shallow but wide hood, and from this angle the top right corner of it looks like it's a petal that sticks out, but it's not, it's just the corner from an odd angle. Now when I look at the bottom petal it make sense. 5D mkII | 35L | 16-35mm F4 L IS | 50mm f1.4 USM | 135L |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NorCalNomad Goldmember  1,074 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: San Fransisco More info | Apr 21, 2011 04:05 | #5426 CircuitR wrote in post #12264707 Now when I look at the bottom petal it make sense.  I have the same hood on my 17-40.actaully unless he has the mkI 16-35 it's a different hood that you get with the 17-40 since the 16-35 mkII is a 87mm filter thread and the mkI is a 77mm ...screw listing gear,it just sets up preconceived notions...but if you must link
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jericobot Cream of the Crop 5,128 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: preppingforthetrumpets More info | Either way the hoods really look funny to me. I noticed it didn't block much flare when I had the 17-40 and the times I shot w/ the 16-35 II. A high quality filter and I was good to go UWA α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NorCalNomad Goldmember 1,074 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: San Fransisco More info | Apr 21, 2011 05:06 | #5428 Jericobot wrote in post #12264767 Either way the hoods really look funny to me. I noticed it didn't block much flare when I had the 17-40 and the times I shot w/ the 16-35 II. A high quality filter and I was good to go UWA I have a EW-83J hood on mine. Works much better for stay light and flare ...screw listing gear,it just sets up preconceived notions...but if you must link
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember 4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Apr 21, 2011 12:18 | #5429 NorCalNomad wrote in post #12264884 I have a EW-83J hood on mine. Works much better for stay light and flare Not on FF it doesn't! -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dandan1 Goldmember 1,223 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Silicon Valley, CA More info | Apr 21, 2011 12:43 | #5430 Zerimar wrote in post #12257972 I really want a 16-35..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is droneworx 894 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
