Collecting Pics Of Lenses. Care to Contribute?

Leftimage wrote in post #12355273
The ''underdog''... I sold it yesterday and wanted to keep the memories. Canon 100-300mm 4.5-5.6 USM

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

When I first switched from FD to EOS, I bought one of these and it really was a dog over 200mm Having used FD lenses for 10 years, I really thought Canon had lowered their standards when I saw the results of the 100-300mm zoom. Consequently, I didn't have it long!

EOS 1D4, 5D3, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS, EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, EF 85mm f/1.2L II * EOS R6, RF 24-105mm f/4.0-7.1 * EOS M5, EF-M 11-22mm f/4.0-5.6 IS, EF-M 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS, EF-M 22mm f/2.0, EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS * FL-F 300mm f/5.6 FLUORITE, FD 55mm f/1.2 ASPHERICAL, FD 24-35mm f/3.5L, FD 50mm f/1.2L, FD 300mm f/2.8L, FD 50-300mm f/4.5L

airbutchie wrote in post #12356231
OH MY!!! That's some sweet goodness right there... Hhehehehehehe... Love it, Julian!!! Anyhoo... DOS from moi... 400L and 85L, respectively... Both wide open...

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/airbutchie/5692​094438/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/airbutchie/5692​035446/

I think my pants just got a bit wet...

flickr | Gear List & Feedback

α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠

Gear List

I shot a whole bunch of lenses recently - when selling some of my gear;

Here's the set on flickr:

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …p/sets/72157626​319317295/

It contains:
Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8
Tokina 35mm f/2.8 macro
Tokina 50-135mm f/2.8
Tokina 80-400mm
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8
Asahi S-M-C Takumar 50mm f/1.4

and a bunch of flashes. They all sold within a week or so, except for the 50-135 which wasn't for sale (never gonna give it up )

Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
~Michael
Gear | Flickr
"My featured shots"

Sir_Loin wrote in post #12356903
When I first switched from FD to EOS, I bought one of these and it really was a dog over 200mm Having used FD lenses for 10 years, I really thought Canon had lowered their standards when I saw the results of the 100-300mm zoom. Consequently, I didn't have it long!

Hehe you're right, it was pretty garbage above 200... In fact it always produced really faint contrast and wasn't all that sharp after 135mm. I saw it as useful, still, because the bokeh was decent enough. The rest I took care of in the post

Example

Canon 60D/ Canon 85mm 1.8/ Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 VC/ Canon 135mm 2.8 SoftFocus/ Canon 50mm 1.8 II/ Manfrotto 7301YB
** www.flickr.com/leftima​ge ** www.obpictures.tumblr.​com
It is amazing how complete is the delusion that beauty is goodness. - Leo Tolstoy

Leftimage wrote in post #12358934
Hehe you're right, it was pretty garbage above 200... In fact it always produced really faint contrast and wasn't all that sharp after 135mm. I saw it as useful, still, because the bokeh was decent enough. The rest I took care of in the post

Example

I had it in the good old film days so post wasn't an option! You've made it look half decent with that image.

EOS 1D4, 5D3, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS, EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, EF 85mm f/1.2L II * EOS R6, RF 24-105mm f/4.0-7.1 * EOS M5, EF-M 11-22mm f/4.0-5.6 IS, EF-M 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS, EF-M 22mm f/2.0, EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS * FL-F 300mm f/5.6 FLUORITE, FD 55mm f/1.2 ASPHERICAL, FD 24-35mm f/3.5L, FD 50mm f/1.2L, FD 300mm f/2.8L, FD 50-300mm f/4.5L

Latest toy, Leica Summicron-M 28/2 ASPH:

Luka C.D| My photos | My videos | My Cameras & Lenses

denoir wrote in post #12361422
Latest toy, Leica Summicron-M 28/2 ASPH:

hey denoir why did you post a picture of my new camera?
jk jk great stuff there. I hope one day I can own a Leica

flickr | Gear List & Feedback

I find it amazing how much smaller wide lenses can be on rangefinders, compare it to this Nikon 28mm f/2.

Now if only someone would come out with a cheap digital rangefinder, what's taking them so long?

Gear List

The Ran wrote in post #12361770
I find it amazing how much smaller wide lenses can be on rangefinders, compare it to this Nikon 28mm f/2.*snip*

Now if only someone would come out with a cheap digital rangefinder, what's taking them so long?

lack of market

...screw listing gear,it just sets up preconceived notions...but if you must link

NorCalNomad.com
Industrial Design Portfolio
$15 Targus Monopod Review

α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠