Official, show us your camera thread...

BucketMan wrote in post #12485900
40D screaming, "I can fly!" Trying my camera out minus the grip lately and liking it! Macro noob rig; 40D, 70-200II and Kenko tubes, Slik tripod

Reminds me of my own...

E James P wrote in post #12496645
DigiNon have fun with your new to you cameras.

TheBurningCrown wrote in post #12496698
Very nice!

You should see my 70-200 on my XT .

richierich1212 wrote in post #12496853
It would be funny seeing that or even the 70-200 f2.8 IS lol.

Well, boys... gLass before body, right?
I own a 1000D (XS) and a 17-40L and I'm also buyng a 24-105L. And I might also get a 70-200 f/4L.

Only then will I consider a new body.


Isn't that how it's supposed to be?

Nope, my old 500D couldn't AF a Rugby match for toffee so onwards and upwards to better things was the only way!

Sure, if possible. But, gLass before body is still my motto!

My setup

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

cute
i like it

Just don't put "L" lenses on it or you'll suffer the ridicule of the DSLR intelligentsia.

RTPVid wrote in post #12510054
Just don't put "L" lenses on it or you'll suffer the ridicule of the DSLR intelligentsia.

Why would it anyone care if he put L on his camera? I think that he would get more respect because with the L glass and a cheap body than an expensive body and cheap glass.

ythe1300 wrote in post #12510123
Why would it anyone care if he put L on his camera? I think that he would get more respect because with the L glass and a cheap body than an expensive body and cheap glass.

I don't know why anyone would care, but apparently, they do think it is funny ...

richierich1212 wrote in post #12496601
For giggles I mounted my 28-70L on my XS:

TheBurningCrown wrote in post #12496698
...You should see my 70-200 on my XT .

richierich1212 wrote in post #12496853
It would be funny seeing that or even the 70-200 f2.8 IS lol.

GuitarFreak wrote in post #12496858
Looks hilarious, doesn't it? I put my 70-200 on my rebel when I got the lens just to see what it would be like. You mount the camera to the lens instead of the other way around

TheBurningCrown wrote in post #12496942
It is the 70-200 f2.8 IS (mk II).

It's so true!

My digital duo

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jj_glos/5782924​482/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jj_glos/5782924​772/

ythe1300 wrote in post #12510123
Why would it anyone care if he put L on his camera? I think that he would get more respect because with the L glass and a cheap body than an expensive body and cheap glass.

I got lots of comments when I got a 100-400L, 70-200/2.8 L IS and 24-105L before replacing my 350D. Lots of people did recognize the lenses but did not grasp the idea of glass before body.

pwm2 wrote in post #12510950
I got lots of comments when I got a 100-400L, 70-200/2.8 L IS and 24-105L before replacing my 350D. Lots of people did recognize the lenses but did not grasp the idea of glass before body.

You think I should upgrade yet? I'm thinking of adding either the 35L or the 24-70.

i don't know if i've posted this (at least i think not in this thread), but it seems to be the current topic

mike cabilangan wrote in post #12512161
i don't know if i've posted this (at least i think not in this thread), but it seems to be the current topic

If i had to take a wild guess, I'd say thats the 200 f2? Doesn't look long enough to be the 300 f2.8

It's a 200 f2.0...

....and I want it....