Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 06 Jun 2011 (Monday) 23:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Recommended telephoto lens?

 
OneJZsupra
Goldmember
Avatar
2,378 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Guam
     
Jun 07, 2011 10:12 |  #16

Snydremark wrote in post #12549748 (external link)
If you increase your budget, you'd be looking at a used 70-200L f/4 non-IS around $500. But really, the 55-250 IS is a really good option.

+150

I always tell people the same thing because the 70-200 stomps out the 55-250 and it doesn't cost much more.


Gear List | Feed Back | My Site (external link)
YN RF-603 O-ring solution


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
ceegee
Goldmember
2,320 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Montreal, Quebec
     
Jun 07, 2011 10:13 |  #17

+ another for the 55-250. It does a very nice job with wildlife.


Gear: Canon 7D, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Canon 24-105L f4, Canon 70-300L, Canon 60 macro f/2.8, Speedlite 580 EXII, 2x AB800

Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HoosierJoe
Goldmember
Avatar
2,575 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 32
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Central Indiana
     
Jun 07, 2011 11:50 |  #18

geeky wrote in post #12551417 (external link)
I say Canon 70-210mm USM, cheaper and better build than the 55-250 IS. Ring Type USM focus, f3.5-4.5, etc. but they are hard to come by

edit: there are currently two on ebay

http://cgi.ebay.com …4aabbce910#ht_2​738wt_1139 (external link)

KEH also has some of them. I almost pulled the trigger on one. But went with the 55-250 instead.



Ain't nothin but a thing.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HoosierJoe
Goldmember
Avatar
2,575 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 32
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Central Indiana
     
Jun 07, 2011 11:53 |  #19

seoul4korea wrote in post #12551433 (external link)
+150

I always tell people the same thing because the 70-200 stomps out the 55-250 and it doesn't cost much more.

Don't know what they cost where you are but here:

New at Crutchfields - 55-250 = $179

70-200= $749

$570 is quite a lot more. Especially on a $300 budget.



Ain't nothin but a thing.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KevC
Goldmember
Avatar
3,154 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: to
     
Jun 07, 2011 13:36 |  #20

Just curiousa bout the 55-250IS.

Does it have ringUSM? I know it wont fit on my 1D, but it might be something to consider if I ever move to APS-C.


Too much gear...
take nothing but pictures .... kill nothing but time .... leave nothing but footprints

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
Avatar
5,168 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Okie
     
Jun 07, 2011 13:43 |  #21

stanwelks wrote in post #12549640 (external link)
I want to buy a telephoto lens for taking pictures of whales jumping out of the water, animals in tress, etc.

I have a XtI and would like to stay under $300.

1. Which lens would you recommend?
2. What accessories should I get to go with it?

Thanks.

For this you need at least a 400mm lens and need to spend a little more .


Hi

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregoryF
Goldmember
Avatar
2,305 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Magalia, CA
     
Jun 07, 2011 13:47 |  #22

KevC wrote in post #12552551 (external link)
Just curiousa bout the 55-250IS.

Does it have ringUSM? I know it wont fit on my 1D, but it might be something to consider if I ever move to APS-C.

No, it does not have any type of USM. also has rotating front.


6D, 5D, 7D, 50D, 40D, Xsi, PENTAX mx-1, Sony a6000, Sony a3000 too many lenses, flashes and aux. gear to list!:cool:
A simple hobby gone horribily wrong

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elogical
Goldmember
Avatar
1,217 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: St Paul, Minnesota
     
Jun 07, 2011 16:59 |  #23

seoul4korea wrote in post #12551433 (external link)
+150

I always tell people the same thing because the 70-200 stomps out the 55-250 and it doesn't cost much more.

Well, it stomps it in a lot of ways but it's not that clear of a decision, the 55-250 has a lot of other advantages beyond just price. It's much smaller. It has significantly more reach and also goes wider (for wildlife, who cares, but if you're using it as a walk-around, 55mm is better than 70mm on a lot of things). And it has IS, so even with the f/5.6, you can shoot in lower light than you can with the 70-200 f/4 non-IS if you're handholding.

Those are the reasons I sold my 70-200 f/4 and kept the 55-250. If I only shot outdoors in good light, I definitely would have preferred the 70-200 though, it was super-fast focusing and pretty sharp through the range


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MOkoFOko
nut impotent and avoiding Geoff
Avatar
19,889 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Michigan, home of the Zombie plague
     
Jun 07, 2011 17:00 |  #24

The 55-250 is your only REAL option. It's regularly $200-$250.


My Gearlist

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 114
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Jun 07, 2011 19:00 |  #25

55-250 with your current budget of $300 or less. It has its nickname for a good reason. Great optics for a great price (may still be at Best Buy for $199).
Tam 70-300 vc if you can swing $450 upfront ($50 rebate takes about 15 days to get in the mail) but at only $400 it is an awesome lens, better build, better optics, longer reach.


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
geeky
Senior Member
Avatar
716 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
     
Jun 07, 2011 23:59 |  #26

Alright, I was being 100% honest with my suggestion earlier.

The Canon 70-210 f3.5-4.5 is a much better telephoto than the 55-250 IS imho.

70-210 f3.5-4.5 USM:
- True ring type USM
- Non Rotating Front element
- better build w/ metal mount
- distance window
- can be found for $150 to $200.
- lower aperture

55-250 IS
- lighter
- IS
- slightly more reach

I've only listed the pros, and in pure honesty, does IS really matter that much on a telephoto? You're most likely going to be using the telephoto outside with plenty of available lighting that you really wont need to slow the shutter speed down. Especially when you compare the apertures of both lenses.

So once again, at the OP's price range, I would suggest the 70-210 f3.5-4.5 USM (becareful, they have a f4 push pull that sucks, so don't confuse the two).


C&C Always Welcome
Canon 5D Classic - Gripped | CanonEOS 1D mkIIn
Canon EF 17-40L | Canon EF 70-200 f4L
Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Canon 85mm f1.8 | Canon 40mm f2.8
430EXII | YN460 II (x2) | YN465 | YN468 | RF602

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
17,826 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 1668
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Jun 08, 2011 01:08 |  #27

seoul4korea wrote in post #12551433 (external link)
+150

I always tell people the same thing because the 70-200 stomps out the 55-250 and it doesn't cost much more.

i like the way a lens that costs 3X more isn't "much more"....

geeky wrote in post #12555786 (external link)
I've only listed the pros, and in pure honesty, does IS really matter that much on a telephoto? You're most likely going to be using the telephoto outside with plenty of available lighting that you really wont need to slow the shutter speed down.

IS on a telephoto is where it's most important...going by the rule of thumb, he'd need a shutter of 1/320 to stop camera shake so he's able to use it in lower light than the 70-210mm...personally i'd way rather have IS than a metal mount, distance window, or non rotating front element....the only real pro i see of the 70-210mm is the USM...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HoosierJoe
Goldmember
Avatar
2,575 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 32
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Central Indiana
     
Jun 08, 2011 11:56 |  #28

geeky wrote in post #12555786 (external link)
Alright, I was being 100% honest with my suggestion earlier.

The Canon 70-210 f3.5-4.5 is a much better telephoto than the 55-250 IS imho.

70-210 f3.5-4.5 USM:
- True ring type USM
- Non Rotating Front element
- better build w/ metal mount
- distance window
- can be found for $150 to $200.
- lower aperture

55-250 IS
- lighter
- IS
- slightly more reach

I've only listed the pros, and in pure honesty, does IS really matter that much on a telephoto? You're most likely going to be using the telephoto outside with plenty of available lighting that you really wont need to slow the shutter speed down. Especially when you compare the apertures of both lenses.

So once again, at the OP's price range, I would suggest the 70-210 f3.5-4.5 USM (becareful, they have a f4 push pull that sucks, so don't confuse the two).

Convincing. I was really divided on which to get. Almost pulled the trigger on the 70-210.



Ain't nothin but a thing.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,283 views & 0 likes for this thread
Recommended telephoto lens?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MerrittRuecker
808 guests, 305 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.