mihaii Member 194 posts Likes: 11 Joined Aug 2007 More info | Jul 13, 2011 03:19 | #5971 and i'm still considering the 85 1.2  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. http://500px.com/MihaiIon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Verbal Member 89 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Turkey More info | Jul 13, 2011 06:44 | #5972   Untitled by yavuzselimk_, on Flickr Untitled by yavuzselimk_, on FlickrFlickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canun Member 35 posts Joined Jun 2011 More info | Jul 13, 2011 20:36 | #5974 quick question: if I will use my 85 to take passport size picture (white background), f1.8 setting is enough with my 580Ex II flash? Canon T1i | Canon 35L ƒ/1.4 | Canon 85 ƒ/1.8 | Canon 18-55 ƒ/3.5-5.6 IS | Canon 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corosario Member  173 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Houston, TX More info | Jul 13, 2011 20:47 | #5975 canun wrote in post #12754346 quick question: if I will use my 85 to take passport size picture (white background), f1.8 setting is enough with my 580Ex II flash? Without knowing some more detail, the simple answer is yes. But, why so shallow the depth of field? An aperture f/4, 5.6 or 8 would be beneficial. Carlos
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canun Member 35 posts Joined Jun 2011 More info | Jul 13, 2011 20:58 | #5976 corosario wrote in post #12754399 Without knowing some more detail, the simple answer is yes. But, why so shallow the depth of field? An aperture f/4, 5.6 or 8 would be beneficial. I only assume f1.8...I will try f/4, 5.6 or 8 though. With that three aperture you mentioned will give me more sharp pics compare to f1.8? - sorry newbie here. Canon T1i | Canon 35L ƒ/1.4 | Canon 85 ƒ/1.8 | Canon 18-55 ƒ/3.5-5.6 IS | Canon 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Jul 13, 2011 21:04 | #5977 canun wrote in post #12754444 I only assume f1.8...I will try f/4, 5.6 or 8 though. With that three aperture you mentioned will give me more sharp pics compare to f1.8? - sorry newbie here. 1.8 could leave you with such shallow depth of field that the entire face might not be in focus and potentially leading to the application being denied. Go with f5.6 for this, its not art.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
phreeky Goldmember 3,515 posts Likes: 15 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Australia More info | Jul 13, 2011 22:30 | #5978 gonzogolf wrote in post #12754479 1.8 could leave you with such shallow depth of field that the entire face might not be in focus and potentially leading to the application being denied. Go with f5.6 for this, its not art. More precisely, at least for most countries, if the photo doesn't look bland and horrible then it WILL get denied
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jhayesphotography Senior Member  505 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: OKC More info | Jul 13, 2011 22:30 | #5979 |
PeyDay17 Goldmember  1,333 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2010 More info |  Day 12 of my 365 project with my daughter, Rylin. SmugMug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GregoryF Goldmember  2,333 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Bella Vista, AR More info | Jul 13, 2011 22:52 | #5981 Love the picture of your daughter. 6D, 5D, 7Dii, Eos R and too many lenses, flashes and aux. gear to list!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PeyDay17 Goldmember 1,333 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2010 More info | Jul 13, 2011 22:56 | #5982 GregoryF wrote in post #12754974 Love the picture of your daughter. If this is for me, thank you! SmugMug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BallenPhoto Cream of the Crop  More info | Jul 13, 2011 23:08 | #5983 PeyDay17 wrote in post #12754927 Day 12 of my 365 project with my daughter, Rylin. That "is" a very nice shot. The Captain and crew finally got their stuff together, now if we can only remember where we left it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mjrod1985 Senior Member  498 posts Joined Jun 2011 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii More info | Jul 14, 2011 04:48 | #5984 I hate this thread! (JK) I just pulled the trigger because I went through the pages... haha... Very Nice pictures you all... Can't wait to post mines... M.J.Rodriguez / Honolulu, Hawaii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mulchie Senior Member 306 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: Out and About More info | Jul 14, 2011 07:12 | #5985 gonzogolf wrote in post #12754479 1.8 could leave you with such shallow depth of field that the entire face might not be in focus and potentially leading to the application being denied. Go with f5.6 for this, its not art. Ditto that. You will need the whole face in focus for the State Department to accept the image. 5D MkII | 450D/XSI | 70-200mm f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 85 F/1.8 | 28 F/1.8 | 430 EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is marthabrand134 391 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
