Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 23 Feb 2006 (Thursday) 20:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma 30mm f1.4 EX DC HSM

 
Brian_R
Goldmember
2,656 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jul 17, 2011 07:48 |  #5491

still playing around with my new favorite lens. loving it so far wish i had time to go around and take more photos so i have been limited to messing around the house.

i have manually adjusted mine because it was front focusing just a little but not enough to complain but enough to mess up a headshot if i took one and its set to +8 on my 7D is that a lot? i have no clue if i did it right but the focus is more on now

IMAGE: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6001/5945723857_c21b727d86_b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Unregistered.Coward
Senior Member
Avatar
884 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Looking thru the viewfinder
     
Jul 17, 2011 17:54 |  #5492

My Muse

IMAGE: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6149/5946244280_05b8511fd3_b.jpg
Canon 1Dmk2, Sigma 30mm, f/1.4, 1/2000, ISO 400

Post processed with Adobe, Raw PreSharpened, Nik Color Efex - Remove Color Cast

....the best camera is the one you have on you at the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FadedBlackSocks
Member
86 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 17, 2011 19:27 |  #5493

What's the distance between you and the subject? I'm going to assume that pic was cropped a good bit.

If I were to take a pic like that and that was the un-cropped image, especially wide open), my 30 would have front focused on the brim of the hat and everything else would be a giant blur. Haha.


Current: EOS 7D | EF 24-105L | EF-S 10-22 | Sigma 30 f/1.4 | Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wfarrell4
Goldmember
Avatar
2,551 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2011
Location: NJ
     
Jul 17, 2011 19:42 |  #5494
bannedPermanent ban

FadedBlackSocks wrote in post #12775291 (external link)
What's the distance between you and the subject? I'm going to assume that pic was cropped a good bit.

If I were to take a pic like that and that was the un-cropped image, especially wide open), my 30 would have front focused on the brim of the hat and everything else would be a giant blur. Haha.

.62m from exif.


Will: flickr (external link)
Canon EOS

Merry Christmas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FadedBlackSocks
Member
86 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 17, 2011 19:48 |  #5495

eskimochaos wrote in post #12775358 (external link)
.62m from exif.

Thanks. I don't have a Flickr account nor will my browser's Exif reader find any useful data. Thanks again.


Current: EOS 7D | EF 24-105L | EF-S 10-22 | Sigma 30 f/1.4 | Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brian_R
Goldmember
2,656 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jul 17, 2011 20:31 |  #5496

are you using single point AF i dont see why it would front focus that much when you are close to the subject. mine doesnt do that and i have test mine right at the minimal focus distance to see what happens

this photo (posted above) is right at the minimal focus distance and is straight out of camera uncroped

http://farm7.static.fl​ickr.com …45723857_c21b72​7d86_b.jpg (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mguffin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,627 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Allendale, NJ
     
Jul 17, 2011 20:57 |  #5497

FadedBlackSocks wrote in post #12775391 (external link)
Thanks. I don't have a Flickr account nor will my browser's Exif reader find any useful data. Thanks again.

Your browser won't find any data if the image is embedded from flickr... and you don't need an account to see EXIF data, if the photographer shares the info, just follow the link to flickr and on the right, click on the camera model...


Mike
Nikon D800 ~ Nikon D500
Sigma 35 f/1.4 DG ~ Nikkor 50 f/1.8G ~ Nikkor 85 f/1.8G ~ Nikkor 12-24 f/4 DX ~ Nikkor 17-55 f/2.8 DX ~ Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 VR ~ Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 DC ~ Sigma 50-100 f/1.8 DC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FadedBlackSocks
Member
86 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 17, 2011 23:38 |  #5498

Brian_R wrote in post #12775632 (external link)
are you using single point AF i dont see why it would front focus that much when you are close to the subject. mine doesnt do that and i have test mine right at the minimal focus distance to see what happens

this photo (posted above) is right at the minimal focus distance and is straight out of camera uncroped

http://farm7.static.fl​ickr.com …45723857_c21b72​7d86_b.jpg (external link)

My 30 is hit or miss. I've been meaning to send it in for calibration but been lazy.

Also, there's a pic I took of a friend at f/1.8 and I was about 3-4ft away from him. I moved the focus point up one and to the right one (on a 7D) to focus on his eye. After importing to the computer, everything was OOF except for the very tip of his nose (no his nose isn't that big either). It practically focused as if I was using the center focus point. The DOF was incredibly shallow thus everything being OOF.

How do you guys take pictures at such close distances wide-open and have the entire subject in focus? ???

mguffin wrote in post #12775753 (external link)
Your browser won't find any data if the image is embedded from flickr... and you don't need an account to see EXIF data, if the photographer shares the info, just follow the link to flickr and on the right, click on the camera model...

Heh, thanks. That's really good to know.


Current: EOS 7D | EF 24-105L | EF-S 10-22 | Sigma 30 f/1.4 | Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mguffin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,627 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Allendale, NJ
     
Jul 18, 2011 06:58 |  #5499

On a 7D with a 30mm lens at f/1.4, and a subject distance of 3.5 feet, the DoF amount is .22 feet (2.6"). So, to answer your question, you won't have everything in focus, aim for the eyes, and call the rest art :-)


Mike
Nikon D800 ~ Nikon D500
Sigma 35 f/1.4 DG ~ Nikkor 50 f/1.8G ~ Nikkor 85 f/1.8G ~ Nikkor 12-24 f/4 DX ~ Nikkor 17-55 f/2.8 DX ~ Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 VR ~ Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 DC ~ Sigma 50-100 f/1.8 DC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brian_R
Goldmember
2,656 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jul 18, 2011 07:20 |  #5500

FadedBlackSocks wrote in post #12776639 (external link)
How do you guys take pictures at such close distances wide-open and have the entire subject in focus? ???

shoot at smaller aperture and that will give you a deeper depth of field

i have had my 30 for a week now and although it performs great i dont know if i adjusted perfectly so i dropped it off today at camera repair japan in duluth, GA and hopefully they will calibrate it to my body and get it tack sharp :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonygonygo
Senior Member
Avatar
532 posts
Gallery: 101 photos
Likes: 701
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
     
Jul 18, 2011 14:57 |  #5501

Time for me to contribute... This one is wide open.

IMAGE: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6007/5952529818_86ceaa13a2_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/14260699@N08/5​952529818/  (external link)
Tattoo Jay (external link) by nylab123 (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6028/5951974841_c24b3ae34e_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/14260699@N08/5​951974841/  (external link)
Tattoo Jay (external link) by nylab123 (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6027/5952532040_791588d7a9_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/14260699@N08/5​952532040/  (external link)
Adam Sandler at work (external link) by nylab123 (external link), on Flickr

I was shooting around 1600 ISO and had shutter speeds between 1/60 and 1/80. I am in love with the low light prime lenses, but I missed quite a few shots! I don't know if it was lens error or operator error. The lens seems fine when I'm "testing" it, but in a dark club it misses people (even with flash).

I'm leaning more towards operating error. My 17-55 IS at f2.8 and ISO3200 was missing alot of shots too (also with flash)!

Does anybody have much experience with the super precision focusing screens?

EOS R | 1DX | 5D Mark III | 16-35L IS | 24-70L II | 100L | 70-200 II | 400L IS II | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brian_R
Goldmember
2,656 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jul 18, 2011 15:12 |  #5502

that could possibly be the result of lack of a high contrast area for the camera to actually focus on. its kind of light pointing the camera at a solid color wall and trying to focus on it, the camera will struggle because it is trying to figure out what to focus on

i think that is the problem most of the time. especially in a dark club i would think




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brianodom
Senior Member
Avatar
672 posts
Likes: 37
Joined Feb 2007
     
Jul 18, 2011 17:16 as a reply to  @ Brian_R's post |  #5503

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Canon EOS 5DsR - 6D - 70D|Canon 17-40L|Σ 35mm 1.4|Tammy 24-70 |Σ 70-200 2.8 and 35mm Art
YONGNUO YN 568 Speedlight X3|
Portfolio: web: www.mattodomphotograph​y.com + Instagram:www.instagra​m.com/mattodomphoto/ + FB: Matt Odom Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FadedBlackSocks
Member
86 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 18, 2011 18:16 |  #5504

Brian_R wrote in post #12777869 (external link)
shoot at smaller aperture and that will give you a deeper depth of field

i have had my 30 for a week now and although it performs great i dont know if i adjusted perfectly so i dropped it off today at camera repair japan in duluth, GA and hopefully they will calibrate it to my body and get it tack sharp :)

This I know.

What I'm asking is how do people shoot wide-open and get everything in focus?

mguffin wrote in post #12777824 (external link)
On a 7D with a 30mm lens at f/1.4, and a subject distance of 3.5 feet, the DoF amount is .22 feet (2.6"). So, to answer your question, you won't have everything in focus, aim for the eyes, and call the rest art :-)

According to www.dofmaster.com (external link), 30mm at f/1.4 on a 7D with a 2.03ft (0.62m) distance yields a 0.07ft (0.84in) DoF.

The subject's face, or any human's face for that matter, is not that shallow. The picture has plenty in focus yet it's supposed to have less than one-third of the DoF of my shot in question.

I pretty much settled for "calling it art" a while ago (haha), but my curiosity is getting the best of me; that's why I ask.


Current: EOS 7D | EF 24-105L | EF-S 10-22 | Sigma 30 f/1.4 | Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brian_R
Goldmember
2,656 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jul 18, 2011 19:26 |  #5505

i mean you can stand further away from your subject to get a deeper DOF but you will get less bokeh in the result as well. its the perfect combination of distance and fstop and possible crop of the image as well.

also because you cant see the entire head it doesnt have to been completely in focus as the illusion will be there if enough if in focus. but to get just the entire face from tip of nose to back of ears in focus is not too hard just play around with the factors that go into DOF and ultimately produce different bokeh




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,103,374 views & 48 likes for this thread, 1247 members have posted to it and it is followed by 32 members.
Sigma 30mm f1.4 EX DC HSM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is softex
575 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.