Raw vs. JPEG

irregardless is now taking a place in my everyday vocabulary.

DAMphyne wrote in post #9849256
Most porn is JPEG's

Now that's just wrong. There was a report out a while ago that the biggest tester of new web technologies is the porn industry, to the extent that developers knew they were on the right track if their streaming video or some other new software was being taken up by porn sites. Why would porn sites use a lossy, inferior format?

^^You may be right,^^
It is RAW

Fair nuff - I don't see any sense in getting into a TIFF about it.

Gedanken wrote in post #9850567
Now that's just wrong. There was a report out a while ago that the biggest tester of new web technologies is the porn industry, to the extent that developers knew they were on the right track if their streaming video or some other new software was being taken up by porn sites. Why would porn sites use a lossy, inferior format?

Some things just weren't meant to be seen in vivid detail...

PhotoMatte wrote in post #9851810
Some things just weren't meant to be seen in vivid detail...

Oh, I would imagine that some might see fit to peep at more than just pixels.

"Irregardless" (coming back to topic ) of matters of morality or taste, internet porn's place as a thermometer of new technologies certainly implies that tecnical issues such as vivid detail are part of the porn industry.

can you guess if this guy shoots RAW or JPEG?
http://www.gdkstudio.c​om/blog/

Interesting conversations. I only shoot RAW.