Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk 
Thread started 18 Mar 2010 (Thursday) 14:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Raw vs. JPEG

 
PMCphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
     
Mar 22, 2010 17:32 |  #91

irregardless is now taking a place in my everyday vocabulary.


Twitter (external link)
Hobart Wedding Photography (external link)
I have some camera stuff. Here it is.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Gedanken
Senior Member
741 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 22, 2010 19:35 |  #92

DAMphyne wrote in post #9849256 (external link)
Most porn is JPEG's

Now that's just wrong. There was a report out a while ago that the biggest tester of new web technologies is the porn industry, to the extent that developers knew they were on the right track if their streaming video or some other new software was being taken up by porn sites. Why would porn sites use a lossy, inferior format? :p


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DAMphyne
"the more I post, the less accurate..."
Avatar
2,156 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 34
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Northern Indiana, USA
     
Mar 22, 2010 21:03 |  #93

^^You may be right,^^
It is RAW ;)


David
Digital set me free
"Welcome Seeker! Now, don't feel alone here in the New Age, because there's a seeker born every minute.";)
www.damphyne.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gedanken
Senior Member
741 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 22, 2010 21:49 |  #94

Fair nuff - I don't see any sense in getting into a TIFF about it. :mrgreen:


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 215
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Mar 22, 2010 22:59 |  #95

Gedanken wrote in post #9850567 (external link)
Now that's just wrong. There was a report out a while ago that the biggest tester of new web technologies is the porn industry, to the extent that developers knew they were on the right track if their streaming video or some other new software was being taken up by porn sites. Why would porn sites use a lossy, inferior format? :p


Some things just weren't meant to be seen in vivid detail...


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gedanken
Senior Member
741 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 23, 2010 03:02 |  #96

PhotoMatte wrote in post #9851810 (external link)
Some things just weren't meant to be seen in vivid detail...

Oh, I would imagine that some might see fit to peep at more than just pixels. ;)

"Irregardless" (coming back to topic :mrgreen: ) of matters of morality or taste, internet porn's place as a thermometer of new technologies certainly implies that tecnical issues such as vivid detail are part of the porn industry.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ontopofm
Senior Member
300 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: CA
     
Aug 30, 2011 10:59 |  #97

can you guess if this guy shoots RAW or JPEG?
http://www.gdkstudio.c​om/blog/ (external link)


Phuc
Flickr (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
11,863 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 3630
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Aug 30, 2011 19:22 as a reply to  @ ontopofm's post |  #98

Interesting conversations. I only shoot RAW.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

8,433 views & 0 likes for this thread
Raw vs. JPEG
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
811 guests, 253 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.