Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Sep 2011 (Monday) 18:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

"Cinematic" colors/hues and edits

 
N.O.R.E.
Senior Member
761 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Canada
     
Sep 19, 2011 18:30 |  #1

Is anyone here into the "cinematic" style of street photos? Typically a 2.5 to 1 format and usually green/purple/blue hue made to look like it's from a movie. If so what are you doing edit wise in Lightroom/Photoshop?

I have been increasing contrast by overlaying a B/W image at about 30% opacity and then a blue/green and yellow gradient also overlayed at about 10% opacity.

Samples of some edits I did:

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3033/5825076071_956ce37214_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3248/5822131455_9a7ed69395_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5200/5873162939_97e485a5f0_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6020/5951094144_34b765f15b_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6026/5951786708_3bb600b31b_b.jpg

Not excatly super "cinematic" but it's a start. What's your technique?

FlickR (external link)
blog: www.tompiprek.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Eric ­ Xu
Senior Member
Avatar
688 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Santa Clara, California
     
Sep 19, 2011 18:39 |  #2

It's certainly interesting, but for the Cinescope shots you should go a little wider.

Since I'm a filmmaker, very early on in photography I experimented with framing my shots like I would when DPing a film shoot, and the emotions were certainly very different. I would recommend adjusting your framing a bit, and using the color correction methods films often use, which is a teal push in the shadows, warming the highlights, and making sure the skin tones are a comfortable hue. The contrast looks very nice in your shots.


My Flickr. (external link) My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stsva
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,360 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 284
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Sep 19, 2011 20:09 |  #3

Very interesting look. Eric Xu sounds like he knows what he's talking about to tweak the look.


Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
http://www.pbase.com/s​tsva/profile (external link)
Member of the GIYF
Club and
HAMSTTR
٩ Breeders Club https://photography-on-the.net …=744235&highlig​ht=hamsttr Join today!
Image Editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
N.O.R.E.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
761 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Canada
     
Sep 19, 2011 20:32 |  #4

Eric Xu wrote in post #13129598 (external link)
It's certainly interesting, but for the Cinescope shots you should go a little wider.

Since I'm a filmmaker, very early on in photography I experimented with framing my shots like I would when DPing a film shoot, and the emotions were certainly very different. I would recommend adjusting your framing a bit, and using the color correction methods films often use, which is a teal push in the shadows, warming the highlights, and making sure the skin tones are a comfortable hue. The contrast looks very nice in your shots.

awesome information. thanks! is there correct ratio 2.5 to 1 then? the examples i posted were 16x9 and 16x6 (not counting the black borders).


FlickR (external link)
blog: www.tompiprek.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikewinburn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,609 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2010
Location: NYC
     
Sep 19, 2011 20:49 |  #5

Cinemascope is usually 2.55:1 or something like that... most widescreen (anamorphic - so called) presentations are 2.35:1 (there about). 16x9 is really just for your TV 1.85:1 is just about filling a 16x9 display.

#1 and #3 look close to correct to my (untrained) eye.

very lovely work.

Eric, I'd love to see some of your work.


Gear: The Official Gear List / Market Feedback / Sig thread #2468
flickr (external link)
WinburnCreations (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eric ­ Xu
Senior Member
Avatar
688 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Santa Clara, California
     
Sep 19, 2011 21:59 |  #6

Either 2.39:1 or 2.35:1 is considered CinemaScope, which is my favorite aspect ratio.

I can show you guys my first film, which is a little rough and not my best work, but it shows what I'm talking about regarding framing and color correction. It's called iRelationship (external link). You have a lot less room to grade with HDV, which is what that was shot on (Canon XH A1). Raw files have so much more flexibility, plus stills are compressed much better than H.264. So the result is photographs will be much crisper and look nicer!

Quick example from a random shot on the Great Wall:

IMAGE: http://i55.tinypic.com/sbq54z.jpg

My Flickr. (external link) My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,651 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 523
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 19, 2011 22:54 |  #7

Psst! You'll need to size that a bit smaller, 1024 pixels at the widest!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eric ­ Xu
Senior Member
Avatar
688 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Santa Clara, California
     
Sep 20, 2011 00:15 |  #8

That's odd, I thought I set it at 1024 in Photoshop. I'll export again, thanks! :)


My Flickr. (external link) My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,651 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 523
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 20, 2011 00:31 |  #9

Cool, now the mods won't jump all over you:)!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kiss-o-matic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,738 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Tokyo
     
Sep 20, 2011 00:48 |  #10

I have been increasing contrast by overlaying a B/W image at about 30% opacity and then a blue/green and yellow gradient also overlayed at about 10% opacity.

Gradient, or gradient map? The shots look very nice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
N.O.R.E.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
761 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Canada
     
Sep 20, 2011 01:02 |  #11

kiss-o-matic wrote in post #13131518 (external link)
Gradient, or gradient map? The shots look very nice.

i meant gradient map.


FlickR (external link)
blog: www.tompiprek.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jaynez
Senior Member
Avatar
771 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2010
     
Sep 20, 2011 01:22 |  #12

Just made one for fun, i do like this effect =)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

IMG_1861 (external link) by JaynezL. (external link), on Flickr

5D Mark II | 6D
24-70mm F2.8L | 17-40mm F4L | Canon 85mm F1.8 USM | Elinchrom D-Lite 4 IT

Flick (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ProwlingTiger
Senior Member
449 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2009
     
Sep 20, 2011 15:31 |  #13

So if I understand this properly, it's layered as such: Blue, green, & yellow gradient map (10%, overlay mode), black and white version (30% overlay, mode), and then the image?


Something will be here later...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
N.O.R.E.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
761 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Canada
     
Sep 20, 2011 17:05 |  #14

ProwlingTiger wrote in post #13134985 (external link)
So if I understand this properly, it's layered as such: Blue, green, & yellow gradient map (10%, overlay mode), black and white version (30% overlay, mode), and then the image?

more or less. I just play around with the opacity until I start to like the look. I also do some dodging/burning depending on image. What I would like to find out is how you get this type of edit:

http://www.flickr.com …s/l/in/faves-9359643@N04/ (external link)

Does anyone know?


FlickR (external link)
blog: www.tompiprek.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eric ­ Xu
Senior Member
Avatar
688 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Santa Clara, California
     
Sep 20, 2011 17:55 |  #15

I see high local contrast, a fine grain structure, understated flesh tones and the same teal push in the shadows and warm highlights I talked about before.

It's not just processing, but has a lot to do with lighting the scene. The film look is in a large part created on set.


My Flickr. (external link) My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

381,944 views & 111 likes for this thread
"Cinematic" colors/hues and edits
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Barryvg
767 guests, 407 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.