Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 24 Sep 2011 (Saturday) 01:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Last decision, help me out

 
Schiso
Junior Member
Avatar
24 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Laguna :)
     
Sep 24, 2011 01:30 |  #1

Hi guys. I got a 60D body and still cannot decide which lens should I get. I am looking for two L lens combo with a limited budget too. Currently, my choices are:

17-40mm f4L for landscape and
135mm f2L for portraits and bokehs

What can you guys suggest? I created a new thread, sorry guys. Dont flame ayt. Hehe


All is well :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lancebroad
Senior Member
Avatar
396 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane, AU
     
Sep 24, 2011 01:37 |  #2

Having the 135 f/2 and the 17-40 I can say they are both cracking lenses on a fullframe.

But for your crop, why not 17-55 f/2.8? I used the 135 f/2 on a crop and it IS GOOD. That lens makes anything look good :D


Canon 6D | Canon 7D | Canon 5D mkII | 14L MK II | 24-70L | 70-200 f/2.8L | 100-400L | 400L f/2.8 | Zenitor 15mm | 580EX II |
http://facebook.com/la​nceb.avgeek (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Schiso
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
Avatar
24 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Laguna :)
     
Sep 24, 2011 01:46 as a reply to  @ lancebroad's post |  #3

Hi lance, so having the 135mm on a crop body wouldnt be a problem? If i will have 17-55, I cant buy another lens as expensive as 135mm :/ Idk but I have an L itch, this wouldnt go away until I get one! :D 135mm is the cheapest L prime? or not?


All is well :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nikmar08
Goldmember
Avatar
1,852 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Bangalore, India
     
Sep 24, 2011 01:56 |  #4

I would say indoors 135mm would be a bit too long and especially if in a studio, you might end up doing more stopped-down work f/4 than most people think!

Sigma or Tamron 17-50 are also very good alternatives to the 17-55.


____O
__( \ \_
((_)/ ((_)
Nikhil | Gear List & Market Feedback | Flickr (external link)
Support POTN by donating here: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Schiso
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
Avatar
24 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Laguna :)
     
Sep 24, 2011 02:05 |  #5

nikmar08 wrote in post #13154543 (external link)
I would say indoors 135mm would be a bit too long and especially if in a studio, you might end up doing more stopped-down work f/4 than most people think!

Sigma or Tamron 17-50 are also very good alternatives to the 17-55.

I dont shoot indoors all the time. I mean P&S is fine for indoors. My interest is on landscapes and bokeh shots. :D Thanks for the input!


All is well :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
N.O.R.E.
Senior Member
764 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Canada
     
Sep 24, 2011 02:15 |  #6

Schiso wrote in post #13154569 (external link)
I dont shoot indoors all the time. I mean P&S is fine for indoors. My interest is on landscapes and bokeh shots. :D Thanks for the input!

135 as the only lens on a crop body sucks. the zoom is a better choice. now if you can get a good all around lens (even the 50m f1.8) then the 135 is a nice complimentary lens for longer shots.


FlickR (external link)
blog: www.tompiprek.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Schiso
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
Avatar
24 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Laguna :)
     
Sep 24, 2011 02:17 |  #7

N.O.R.E. wrote in post #13154590 (external link)
135 as the only lens on a crop body sucks. the zoom is a better choice. now if you can get a good all around lens (even the 50m f1.8) then the 135 is a nice complimentary lens for longer shots.

Hey thanks for the reply, but I will have 17-40mm with the 135mm, what do you think? Thanks!


All is well :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sryinex
Member
113 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Sep 24, 2011 02:18 |  #8

Tamron 17-50 & a 135L gets my vote.


5D2 300F4.0L IS 24-70L 135L 100mm f2.8 Macro 430 ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nikmar08
Goldmember
Avatar
1,852 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Bangalore, India
     
Sep 24, 2011 02:19 |  #9

I understand that you won't shoot indoors all the time but would you not like something that you can use if you were to? Anyway, once you say bokeh is the most important criterion for you, I cannot argue any more against the 135, gets rated as one of the finest in that dept.


____O
__( \ \_
((_)/ ((_)
Nikhil | Gear List & Market Feedback | Flickr (external link)
Support POTN by donating here: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nikmar08
Goldmember
Avatar
1,852 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Bangalore, India
     
Sep 24, 2011 02:22 |  #10

N.O.R.E. wrote in post #13154590 (external link)
135 as the only lens on a crop body sucks.

Can you elaborate? IMO that is a bit overboard!!


____O
__( \ \_
((_)/ ((_)
Nikhil | Gear List & Market Feedback | Flickr (external link)
Support POTN by donating here: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thestone11
Goldmember
Avatar
1,203 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
     
Sep 24, 2011 02:25 |  #11

17-40mm on a crop is not wide enough for landscape. I suggest the sigma 10-20mm for landscape, then another 50mm prime for portraits. If you demand something that you can walk around with, then swap the 50mm for 24-70mm f/2.8


Canon 5D MK II | Fuji X100 | Canon T2i | Canon 100mm macro f/2.8 | Canon 135L f/2 | Canon 50mm f/1.2 L | 17-40mm f/4 L | 24-70mm f/2.8 L | 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM |Canon 430EX II Flash X2 | Pocketwizard TT5 & TT1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Schiso
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
Avatar
24 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Laguna :)
     
Sep 24, 2011 02:26 |  #12

nikmar08 wrote in post #13154600 (external link)
I understand that you won't shoot indoors all the time but would you not like something that you can use if you were to? Anyway, once you say bokeh is the most important criterion for you, I cannot argue any more against the 135, gets rated as one of the finest in that dept.

Thanks for the concern, im looking for an EF/EFS lens with an equivalent price of 17-40mm hehe. So the 135mm would be my first lens, the other one is unknown yet.

What zoom lens can you suggest with the price the same as 17-40mm?


All is well :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lancebroad
Senior Member
Avatar
396 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane, AU
     
Sep 24, 2011 02:29 |  #13

N.O.R.E. wrote in post #13154590 (external link)
135 as the only lens on a crop body sucks. the zoom is a better choice. now if you can get a good all around lens (even the 50m f1.8) then the 135 is a nice complimentary lens for longer shots.

Id like to know why the 135/2 sucks on a crop?


Canon 6D | Canon 7D | Canon 5D mkII | 14L MK II | 24-70L | 70-200 f/2.8L | 100-400L | 400L f/2.8 | Zenitor 15mm | 580EX II |
http://facebook.com/la​nceb.avgeek (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Schiso
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
Avatar
24 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Laguna :)
     
Sep 24, 2011 02:31 |  #14

thestone11 wrote in post #13154609 (external link)
17-40mm on a crop is not wide enough for landscape. I suggest the sigma 10-20mm for landscape, then another 50mm prime for portraits. If you demand something that you can walk around with, then swap the 50mm for 24-70mm f/2.8

Will look at that sigma 10-20mm and 50mm! Thankssss. Those are one of my choices but I am having that L itch. Weee, thanks!


All is well :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gacon1
Senior Member
Avatar
639 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
     
Sep 24, 2011 02:33 |  #15

Schiso wrote in post #13154437 (external link)
Hi guys. I got a 60D body and still cannot decide which lens should I get. I am looking for two L lens combo with a limited budget too. Currently, my choices are:

17-40mm f4L for landscape and
135mm f2L for portraits and bokehs

What can you guys suggest? I created a new thread, sorry guys. Dont flame ayt. Hehe

3 years ago, I used 17-40mm f4 L and 135mm F2 L with my 20d, 30d, then sold all of my gears. Just got them back (this time with the 5D II) 2 weeks ago, from BH. You are going the right way, so go for it !

By the way, here is a clip I believe you want to view
http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=zyqByJsdjxQ (external link)
Canon 135mm f/2 L - the Lord of the Red Rings?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,813 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Last decision, help me out
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Little Branch Photography
705 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.