Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 17 Sep 2011 (Saturday) 19:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Considering building 10TB+ NAS

 
Nics701
Member
50 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Sep 17, 2011 19:49 |  #1

I'm considering building a 10TB+ NAS for backing up my pictures as I'm getting tired of having external hard drives everywhere and I actually use two computers (one being a win7 PC and one a mac OSX system).

I'm going to be running this as RAID 5 system to prevent file corruption/loss and my friend has suggested running Solaris o/s based NAS instead of my original idea of the FreeNAS o/s.

This NAS would be holding other files besides photo backups, but is/are there problems or considerations that I should keep a look out for when dealing with photography backups that would differ from it being used as a giant network file dump? (sorry if my wording isn't correct or confusing, I'm still new to the NAS idea and still researching)

I actually got the idea from this forum thread: http://hardforum.com/s​howthread.php?t=139393​9 (external link) But I'm not going to go all hardware crazy.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 18, 2011 00:01 |  #2

A NAS generally isn't fast enough as a working drive, but is fine for an archive.

Consider how you're going to do your offsite backups. At 10TB you're going to need to split it among 2-5 disks, or use an expensive tape backup. That or another NAS which you carry around, the internet's too slow to back up online yet.

Or maybe you should just look harder at the delete button, unless you have a legitimate use for that much data ;)


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Plow
Member
171 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
     
Sep 18, 2011 21:31 |  #3

You should go with RAID6 this way you can lose 2 disks in the RAID group and not be totally f***ed. In RAID5 if you lose 2 disks at the same time, your data is gone.

No matter which RAID level you choose always remember this cardinal rule...RAID is NOT a backup. So whatever capacity you plan on, make sure you have the same capacity to back up to.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Xcelx
Senior Member
558 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Sep 20, 2011 03:49 |  #4

Mr. Plow wrote in post #13124611 (external link)
No matter which RAID level you choose always remember this cardinal rule...RAID is NOT a backup. So whatever capacity you plan on, make sure you have the same capacity to back up to.

Exactly, can't stress this enough. Raid is no substitute for backup! RAID 5-6 should keep you up and running all the time but you don't forget to back it up




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nics701
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
50 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Sep 20, 2011 09:38 |  #5

I do cd backups as well, but just wanted to know if there was anything I needed to know for streamlining my workflow.

Of course not all of the 10 TB will be dedicated to photos, it's also a file dump for all my music and and movies for an HTPC, etc.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
woloi
Senior Member
262 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Boston, MA (FINALLY!)
     
Sep 24, 2011 06:33 as a reply to  @ Nics701's post |  #6

Consider doing two backups.

I'm trying to setup my own backup solution, I'm thinking of putting a NAS on my home network for daily/weekly/monthly (depending on space) backups, and then a second NAS on my parents' home network (located ~250 miles away) for weekly/monthly backups. This way, short of a massive disaster, my data should be fairly safe.

And just have to agree that RAID 5 is no good for disks of that size, too much chance for an error to wipe everything out. I personally use 1TB RAID 1 on my Windows 7 desktop, and it's already had one drive fail 8 months after the system was built.


Canon 400D
Sigma 20mm f/1.8 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 | Canon EF 24-105 f/4L IS | Canon EFS 10-22 f/3.5-4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nics701
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
50 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Sep 24, 2011 09:18 |  #7

I never knew a raid 6 existed, thanks for the heads up.

But yes I want to have a smaller NAS available on my own home network for photography backups, but also store files for HTPC streaming. I think my friend is running a 20TB NAS a few states away and he said he would let me back up on his NAS just in case my house burns down, etc.

I was suggested running a Solaris based NAS, but I feel that FreeNAS would be easier to operate. I don't really know how I feel about the Win7 server o/s since it costs money, and I don't know how well it would mesh with my Mac o/s. Opinions, suggestions? Thanks in advance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Plow
Member
171 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
     
Sep 30, 2011 10:46 |  #8

How much money do you want to spend? You may be better off going with a NAS box from synology or something like that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nics701
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
50 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Oct 01, 2011 10:18 |  #9

Well the only things I would really need to invest in are the HDD's and a raid controller card thingie. I have a lot of spare parts from over the years of building computers, so it's not going to kill my wallet or anything like that. I have looked at synology boxes, and they were nice, but I couldn't remember why I was turned off by them except for the price, or the lack of running BT.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,977 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Considering building 10TB+ NAS
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is sinonaut
858 guests, 187 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.