Since you are second shooting. I would suggest a 40D. You can get one very cheap and then the 50 1.8. If you can swing it the Tammy 28 to 75... You can get 1600 out of the 40D with a good exposure and post processing.
Sep 24, 2011 09:52 | #16 Since you are second shooting. I would suggest a 40D. You can get one very cheap and then the 50 1.8. If you can swing it the Tammy 28 to 75... You can get 1600 out of the 40D with a good exposure and post processing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jimconnerphoto Goldmember ![]() 2,165 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Southern California More info | Sep 24, 2011 13:10 | #17 Trust me, you can do it. I shot weddings for many years and the fastest film I used was 400. I got excited when Kodak came out with 800 that was suppose to be as good as their 400 but only used it once. Wedding and Portraits www.jimconnerphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
images by Paul Senior Member 346 posts Joined Apr 2010 Location: USA More info | Sep 24, 2011 14:53 | #18 zagiace wrote in post #13152791 ![]() monopod, tripod, flash. It is nice to have higher ISO/ lower noise available but you don't have to have it. Been done for years. It is only very recently that higher ISO performance actually became a deliverable product outside of journalism. very true. Now it's viewed as "art"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is Jimmymod67 742 guests, 224 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |