So I have finally "realized" that my 35L is not enough for my landscape photography. I am going to Kyoto next month, and I need something wider for my tripod based landscape shots.
I've been thinking about the 17-40 L vs the 16-35 L.
The 16-35 costs nearly trice as much as the 17-40, and is probably a little bit better in some ways. But does it really matter which one I choose, if I only want to use the lens stopped down (around f8 - f10 - f16) on a tripod?
They should be equally good when used this way, yeah?