Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 03 Sep 2011 (Saturday) 19:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5D Mark II Grip or No Grip?

 
karkid
Member
99 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Sep 03, 2011 19:13 |  #1

Before you guys say anything i can believe there are already a million threads like this. I just upgraded from the 7D which was gripped, to the 5D Mark II. got my mark II off the classifieds got it with an authentic canon grip. 7D was on a photix grip, and i can say this one feels nicer. But when the 85L is on feels nicer without the Grip. 5DMK2 that is.

So just wondering 5DMK2 user's gripped or not?


5DMK2|85 L II |24-70L|16-35L|70-200 2.8 IS MK2L|430EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,360 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1836
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
Sep 03, 2011 19:22 |  #2

I have a grip (after marktet) for my 5DMKII but don't use it very often. Only when on specific shoots where I may need the extra battery capacity and the occasional portrait orientation grip. Otherwise I think it makes the camera too bulky and awkward to hold - and very conspicious in crowds... :)

Sometimes I get the impression that there are wannabee photographers that have a "grip" as some sort of badge to show they are real pros... :twisted:


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
Canon R5, R,, RF24-105/1:4 + RF70-200mm F/2.8 + RF15-35mm F/2.8 + 50mm 1.4 USM + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + RF100mm F/2.8 + GODOX V860 IIC+ 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCAsan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,918 posts
Likes: 88
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
Sep 03, 2011 19:25 as a reply to  @ vk2gwk's post |  #3

not. No way I want more cost (grip itself, plus higher coster cost RRS L plate), more bulk, more weight...etc. The grip will not improve an IQ.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Unregistered.Coward
Senior Member
Avatar
884 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Looking thru the viewfinder
     
Sep 03, 2011 19:52 |  #4

MCAsan wrote in post #13047207 (external link)
The grip will not improve an IQ.

I don't think anybody makes a claim that it does. Use of a grip is a personal choice based on ergonomics and battery life requirements.

I use them on all my cameras, save the 1Dmk2 obviously. I like the added heft, the larger perch presented for my hand in both orientations, the additional location for threading my strap through while not interfering with tripod mount. That makes the expense worthwhile to me.

You requirements may differ.


....the best camera is the one you have on you at the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wfarrell4
Goldmember
Avatar
2,551 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2011
Location: NJ
     
Sep 03, 2011 19:54 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

It depends...no really, it does.


Will: flickr (external link)
Canon EOS

Merry Christmas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fodowsky
Senior Member
Avatar
591 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Sep 03, 2011 20:12 |  #6

I don't and have never wished I did. YMMV.

The choice is yours.


Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LudwigVB
Senior Member
Avatar
408 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Sydney, Oz
     
Oct 03, 2011 14:10 |  #7

I bought an after market grip for my 40D. Nothing wrong with the grip but I really don't like it very much because it's so bulky. I'm thinking of selling it. As always, YMMV.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rdompor
Senior Member
Avatar
671 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
     
Oct 03, 2011 15:07 |  #8

I shot with a 1D2 for a couple of years while I working for a daily paper. I used to love the grip on it but I eventually decided that the size made it more difficult for me to keep the camera on me at all times. Now I have a 5D2 and love the fact that I'm not hindered by portability as much as before. My style also changed and I find that most of my photos are shot in a landscape orientation anyway. As for battery life, I find that I don't have to recharge my batteries for 1 or 2 weeks at a time.

But this is my personal experience. No one can tell you what you prefer.


Ramon
ULTRAMONTAGNE (external link)
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moonjo
Senior Member
Avatar
401 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Rocky Mountains
     
Oct 03, 2011 15:13 as a reply to  @ rdompor's post |  #9

Had the grip for my 40D, now back up body, and I have it for my 5DII. Love the grip. I shoot a lot of portrait.


EOS R5 BG-R10 | EOS R5 | Canon RF70-200 f/2.8L IS | Canon RF24-70mm f/2.8LIS | Canon EF100mm f/2.8LIS | Canon EF135mm f/2.0L | Canon EF85mm f/1.2L II | Canon EF24-105 f/4.0L IS | 580EX II.... and other lighting stuff

Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Oct 03, 2011 15:17 |  #10

I dont particularly care for grips, but I have to have them when Im shooting something like an event for all the back and forth between landscape and portrait I do. If I dont then my wrist ends up hurting and I hate that more.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gorby
Senior Member
531 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Oct 03, 2011 16:19 |  #11

I'm interested in this also. I heard there was a design flaw about something with moisture seeping into the battery compartment or another.


5D MKII | 650D [SIZE=2][SIZE=2][SIZE=​1]| 350D (RIP)
17-40 f/4L | 70-200 f/4L | 50mm 1.8 | 18-135 STM IS
My work (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ManiZ
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 110
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Mile High City
     
Oct 03, 2011 16:29 |  #12

There are countless threads like this one. And yes, they are all correct because it really is personal preference. I use one because of my big hands; without it, any SLR is uncomfortable for me to use for long. I could care less about the additional battery life because not being a pro or using the camera extensively for video means that I can easily live with the standard LP-E6 life in-between charges.


5D4 Gripped | 16-35 f4L IS | 24-70 f2.8L II | 70-200 f2.8L II IS | 85 f1.8 | 600EX-RT | 430EXII | YN-468II | YN-622c | 'Stuff'

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
harcosparky
Goldmember
2,431 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 62
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Harford County - ( Bel Air ) Maryland
     
Oct 03, 2011 16:51 |  #13

Never used a grip ... except when they were needed for the motor drive that was in them for advancing the film.

Won't use them now, even for portrait work.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
harcosparky
Goldmember
2,431 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 62
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Harford County - ( Bel Air ) Maryland
     
Oct 03, 2011 16:58 |  #14

gorby wrote in post #13200342 (external link)
I'm interested in this also. I heard there was a design flaw about something with moisture seeping into the battery compartment or another.


Read about that on a review of the 7D. The reviewer commented that Canon seemed to have remedied the situation on the 7D, but that an issue existed with water seepage on the 5D.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wernersl
Goldmember
Avatar
1,944 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Temecula, CA
     
Oct 03, 2011 17:21 |  #15

i much prefer using a grip. to say it wont affect image quality...well kinda. i tend to hold the camera more steadily with the grip so for me it kind of does affect IQ. as ive said before, i wish they would bring back the grip design like that of the 1V. integrated into the existing grip and fit a lot more seamless than the warts they are now.

dont think i could ever be comfortable without them now.


Shawn l Gear
Mamarazzi Photography (external link)
Wife owns the biz...I just shoot the weddings!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,976 views & 0 likes for this thread, 42 members have posted to it.
5D Mark II Grip or No Grip?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2172 guests, 148 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.