Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 07 Oct 2011 (Friday) 15:07
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Perfect Walkaround Lens"
Canon 17-55 2.8
72
23.2%
Canon 24-105 L
88
28.3%
Canon 15-85 IS
70
22.5%
Tamron 17-50
8
2.6%
Tamron 28-75
6
1.9%
Prime ?
26
8.4%
Other ?
41
13.2%

311 voters, 311 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

The perfect walkaround lens

 
iamatrix
Member
104 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Oct 07, 2011 15:07 |  #1

I just got a bonus at work which means I can buy a new lens for my XSI. Even though I have the money it doesn't mean I want to spend it all. So, giving the choice of the lenses in the Poll, which one would be the best quality walk-around lens for indoor and outdoor use that could capture my kids.

I am including Primes because for the price of the 17-55 or 24-105, I could also get a couple primes: 50 1.4 + 85 1.8, etc.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mistabernie
'Camera Unicorn McSparkles'..
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 29
Joined Mar 2010
Location: south of Boston, MA
     
Oct 07, 2011 15:10 |  #2

I voted other -- if you're considering the 17-55, go for the Sigma 17-50 instead. ~$300 cheaper brand new. Sounds like it'd be great for what you want to use it for.


Donate if you love POTN! | Smugmug (external link) | Gear List & POTN Marketplace Feedback
Feel free to call me Bernie.
LIVING PROOF WHY YOU DON'T MENTION THE TITLE FAIRY...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
th0rr
Member
199 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NorthWest
     
Oct 07, 2011 15:15 |  #3

Mistabernie wrote in post #13218550 (external link)
I voted other -- if you're considering the 17-55, go for the Sigma 17-50 instead. ~$300 cheaper brand new. Sounds like it'd be great for what you want to use it for.

+1. I did and have not looked back. Luv my Siggy.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Oct 07, 2011 15:23 |  #4

I voted other because I like the 17-70 OS as a walkaround. Good compromise between range and aperture.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raylon
Goldmember
Avatar
1,078 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Plainfield, IL
     
Oct 07, 2011 15:24 |  #5

Sigma 17-50


7D l Canon 70-200 f/4L IS l Canon 85mm f/1.8 l ∑ 17-50 f/2.8 l Canon 50mm f/1.8 II l S95
Full Gear List and Marketplace Feedback
My SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ktownhero
Senior Member
313 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2011
     
Oct 07, 2011 15:32 |  #6

Sigma 17-50 OS HSM

The IQ of the Canon without the absurd price and with better build quality, a longer warranty, and smaller size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,351 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 792
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Oct 07, 2011 15:34 |  #7

I know it's heavy like a brick but I like the variety of focal lengths you get with the 24-105. I also have a 28-135 IS on loan I'm hoping to get back soon from my friend.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Oct 07, 2011 15:42 |  #8

i voted for the 15-85, it's hard to beat for a walk around lens on a crop body.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markeb
Member
146 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2010
Location: NoVA
     
Oct 07, 2011 15:48 |  #9

If you want reach, 15-85. Great lens.

If you need mostly indoor/lower light, or aren't as concerned with reach, Sigma 17-50.


T2i 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 30 mm f/1.4, Canon 60 mm f/2.8 Macro, Canon 15-85 IS USM, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 EX HSM OS, 430EX II S95 G7X

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Oct 07, 2011 15:48 |  #10

For a crop body? IMO the 17-55 hands down. Though I have never owned the Sigma 17-50, so I cant comment there.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
T2i4me
Goldmember
Avatar
2,906 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Surf City, CA
     
Oct 07, 2011 16:02 |  #11

I find most of my "walking around" is in daylight, 15-85 has been perfect for my style and like having the longer end.


-- Eric --
6DMKII - 5DC - 80D - 70-200 F2.8 IS III - 100-400 L IS - 70-200 F4 L - 17-40 L - EF 85 1.8 - EF-S 10-22 - EF-S 15-85 IS - EF-S 18-135 USM IS - EF-S 60 macro - 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
silvrg35
Member
190 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Oct 07, 2011 16:54 |  #12

17-55mm all the way for a cropped body. You would want the 17mm end for a walkaround lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Oct 07, 2011 18:01 |  #13

iamatrix wrote in post #13218533 (external link)
I just got a bonus at work which means I can buy a new lens for my XSI. Even though I have the money it doesn't mean I want to spend it all. So, giving the choice of the lenses in the Poll, which one would be the best quality walk-around lens for indoor and outdoor use that could capture my kids.

I think it comes down to whether you want the range of the 15-85 IS or the constant f2.8 of the 17-55 IS.

You'd actually do well to snag both the Sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS and the Sigma 30 f1.4 (for the same price as the 17-55 f2.8 IS alone).

Enjoy whatever you end up with.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
You-by-Lou
Goldmember
Avatar
1,691 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Manhattan
     
Oct 07, 2011 20:08 |  #14

I voted 15-85
Own it and want to see it win the poll!


You may say I'm a Zoomer, But I'm not the only one
Canon 5D mkIII
135L my new favorite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raylon
Goldmember
Avatar
1,078 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Plainfield, IL
     
Oct 07, 2011 20:09 |  #15

LightRules wrote in post #13219083 (external link)
You'd actually do well to snag both the Sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS and the Sigma 30 f1.4 (for the same price as the 17-55 f2.8 IS alone).


That right there is a fantastic idea.


7D l Canon 70-200 f/4L IS l Canon 85mm f/1.8 l ∑ 17-50 f/2.8 l Canon 50mm f/1.8 II l S95
Full Gear List and Marketplace Feedback
My SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,642 views & 0 likes for this thread, 54 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
The perfect walkaround lens
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Fungus
1290 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.