Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk 
Thread started 01 Oct 2008 (Wednesday) 06:12
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Does this show the macro variations well"
Great
116
70.7%
Good
33
20.1%
Ok
11
6.7%
Bad
4
2.4%

164 voters, 164 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

STICKY: Macro Variations

 
John_B
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,040 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 966
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawaii
     
Oct 17, 2008 07:07 |  #16

Ballen Photo,
Thanks, glad you liked it :)

Warl0rd,
Yes DOF is shallow with macro and gets even shallower with more magnification and so does working distance.

I agree with macro junkie, a set of Kenko tubes (68mm) will give you 2:1 magnification (with the Canon 100mm f/2.8 lens) with no reduction in sharpness (unlike a filter or TC). In my opinion its the best low cost way to achieve more magnification. :)

As for macro filters I haven't used them since my film days and currently don't have or recommend them (or want them), so sorry as I can't add that. :)


Sony A6500, A6000, Apeman A80, & a bunch of Lenses.............  (external link)
click to see (external link)
JohnBdigital.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
macro ­ junkie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,709 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Somerset - UK
     
Oct 23, 2008 23:46 |  #17

this is a very good thread bw!


Uk prayingmantis forum - http://www.dragonscres​t.co.uk/forums/index.p​hp (external link)
My flickr gallery -http://www.flickr.com/​photos/hooked_on_macro​/ (external link)
DA Gallery where i sell prints - http://macrojunkie.dev​iantart.com/ (external link)
MPE-65MM - MT-24EX Twin Macro Flash (diffused with 2 X Gary Fong Puffer diffuser)
EF-S 60mm f2.8 USM - 430ex (diffused with lumeriqest soft box)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airdima
Senior Member
288 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Israel
     
Dec 28, 2008 11:21 |  #18

very useful and covers all of the options i currently have in mind with my 100mm macro. thanks for sharing!


My Facebook Page (external link)
My Website (external link) || My Blog (external link) (Hebrew)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
El_Coyote
Member
32 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Ã…rhus, Denmark
     
Jan 29, 2009 08:51 |  #19

This is great, I admit i almost fell off my chair when i saw the MP-E with a 2XTC where the 5 didnt even fit in the frame.
Awesome thread mate :)


http://elcoyote.devian​tart.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_B
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,040 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 966
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawaii
     
Jan 29, 2009 18:52 |  #20

Thanks,
Glad you liked it :)


Sony A6500, A6000, Apeman A80, & a bunch of Lenses.............  (external link)
click to see (external link)
JohnBdigital.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nuffi
Senior Member
926 posts
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 26, 2009 15:18 |  #21

So... It looks like the most macro was the MP-E at 5x with the 2x converter.

How far away from the subject were you?


A very close second was the 2x TC + 68mm tubes + 100mm macro + 50mm reversed. The two shots look very very different in terms of detail though; one the black is very saturated and the other you can see a lot of extra scuffing. Was that because of the lights, the exposure, some other environmental reasons or was that just a good example of the differences in the results you can expect?

If end result detail was all that mattered (you were taking something intricate that you needed to blow up to A3 for example) which rig would you want?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_B
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,040 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 966
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawaii
     
Aug 26, 2009 16:32 |  #22

nuffi,
These were just to show the magnification not the quality. They were shot at different times so there may be some variance between them all.
The working room was almost impossible to get light to with the 2x TC + 68mm +100mm +reversed 50mm but figured I would at least try to compare the magnification.

In the end I would want my MP-E 65mm alone as 5 x life size is usually more then enough. :)


Sony A6500, A6000, Apeman A80, & a bunch of Lenses.............  (external link)
click to see (external link)
JohnBdigital.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
systemlayers
Junior Member
23 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Oct 08, 2009 18:07 |  #23

Hey thanks for this i would like to add that a reversed ultra wide angle lens will get very close, i will post some results .
Haven't seen anyone recommend it around here which i find strange but if you can a 4 dollar reversing ring off ebay and a wide angle is a lot of fun.
On my 1.6x crop sensor T1i i only get about 2.5mm in view with 68mm of extension and 4mm in view without them.
(In brian petersons book he says you get about 4x magnification with an ultra wide angle).
Very cool very shallow depth of field though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
duxbar
Member
65 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Oct 20, 2009 12:41 |  #24

Incredibly helpful!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yeow_Z
Goldmember
Avatar
1,198 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Orange County
     
Oct 20, 2009 19:50 |  #25

great one!! bookmarked and subbed! just a quicky dumb question, mp-e65 is for macro only? you cant use it in portraits?


Flickr (external link)
webpage (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
According to the lazy TF, My flatulence rates
Avatar
54,331 posts
Likes: 1722
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Oct 20, 2009 19:53 |  #26

yeow_Z wrote in post #8861847 (external link)
great one!! bookmarked and subbed! just a quicky dumb question, mp-e65 is for macro only? you cant use it in portraits?

It does great bug portraits. :)

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2661/3879582525_d7b766b286_b.jpg

Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yeow_Z
Goldmember
Avatar
1,198 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Orange County
     
Oct 20, 2009 19:58 |  #27

^lol. sorry! i mean, people, cars, etc. my bad..


Flickr (external link)
webpage (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
According to the lazy TF, My flatulence rates
Avatar
54,331 posts
Likes: 1722
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Oct 20, 2009 20:01 |  #28

yeow_Z wrote in post #8861885 (external link)
^lol. sorry! i mean, people, cars, etc. my bad..

Not unless they have a very very tiny head. The MPE-65 starts at 1:1 and zooms in from there.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ofafeather
Senior Member
645 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Ancramdale, NY
     
Apr 13, 2010 11:38 |  #29

Great thread. Hoping to pick up a 100 soon. Guess I'll need the Kenko tubes next. What can I sell, what can I sell?


Canon 7D, 5D Mark II and some Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
backeyjakic
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Oct 2011
     
Nov 02, 2011 08:02 |  #30

Macro Variations

I would like to create a filter macro to activate the 500 hz crystal filter in my TS-480.

#
#
# RADIO-CONTROL
#
#--

center-on 1500

Set button-select Nar 1 //500hz filter

I couldnt seem to get this to work. I must be missing something in the syntax. Does anybody know if this can be done and what the proper syntax would be?

Thanks,

Steve - N9SB




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

57,456 views & 0 likes for this thread
Macro Variations
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is opertluser
678 guests, 296 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.