editing through some more, lemme know what you think!
Setup:
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' |
result:
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
Gabi


paradiddleluke Goldmember ![]() 3,594 posts Likes: 108 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Nov 11, 2011 12:57 | #2701 editing through some more, lemme know what you think!
result:
Gabi ![]() ![]() Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SaxonIV Senior Member ![]() 768 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Alabama More info | Nov 11, 2011 12:59 | #2702 Is that just direct flash? If so, did you have to clean up any nasty reflections?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tagakweens Goldmember 1,028 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: North Jersey More info | Nov 11, 2011 13:06 | #2703 paradiddleluke wrote in post #13386513 ![]() editing through some more, lemme know what you think! Setup:
result:
Gabi ![]() ![]() is it just me, but I don't see the setup shot...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rivest Cream of the Crop ![]() 6,678 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Canada. More info | Nov 11, 2011 13:10 | #2704 I see it. Hi, I'm David.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
moeronn Goldmember 2,516 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: SoCal More info | Nov 11, 2011 13:11 | #2705 SaxonIV wrote in post #13386526 ![]() Is that just direct flash? If so, did you have to clean up any nasty reflections? Looks like it is bare flash using the QBox bracket and ballhead. Rivest wrote in post #13386576 ![]() I see it. Me too. Nice and simple with great results.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tagakweens Goldmember 1,028 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: North Jersey More info | Nov 11, 2011 13:12 | #2706 ^^
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paradiddleluke Goldmember ![]() 3,594 posts Likes: 108 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Nov 11, 2011 13:23 | #2707 Thanks all, yep that was just bare flash, I did some skin work in photoshop and curves stuff to make it more contrasty on the wall while making the light on her face/skin less harsh as it was just a bare flash. And yeah that is correct the flash is on the Qbox bracket, I pretty much walk around with the box and the stand, easy to just pull the box off (or not even put it on) if I want more harsh light or simply just a quicker setup/tear down per location. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Canonswhitelensesrule Goldmember ![]() 3,648 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Surrey, B.C. More info | Nov 11, 2011 13:39 | #2708 tagakweens wrote in post #13386554 ![]() is it just me, but I don't see the setup shot... I think what tagakweens was referring to was the fact that the model's "pose" in the "setup" shot is different than her "pose" in the actual "resulting" photograph posted. Photographers do it in 1/1,000th of a second...but the memory lasts forever!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tagakweens Goldmember 1,028 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: North Jersey More info | Nov 11, 2011 13:44 | #2709 Canonswhitelensesrule wrote in post #13386733 ![]() I think what tagakweens was referring to was the fact that the model's "pose" in the "setup" shot is different to her "pose" in the actual "resulting" photograph posted. In the "setup" shot, the model is crouched down, but in the "resulting" photograph posted, she's standing up. At least that's what I conclude from this. thanks (and sorry for the confusion to my inquiry).... but my question was more literal... I actually don't see the "setup" picture, i only see the "result" pic... i think it's my work pc... sometimes it doesn't let me see pictures that are posted here....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Canonswhitelensesrule Goldmember ![]() 3,648 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Surrey, B.C. More info | Nov 11, 2011 13:52 | #2710 tagakweens wrote in post #13386746 ![]() thanks (and sorry for the confusion to my inquiry).... but my question was more literal... I actually don't see the "setup" picture, i only see the "result" pic... i think it's my work pc... sometimes it doesn't let me see pictures that are posted here.... thanks though.. ![]() Ahh ok...my bad. Didn't mean to put words into your mouth. Photographers do it in 1/1,000th of a second...but the memory lasts forever!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tagakweens Goldmember 1,028 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: North Jersey More info | Nov 11, 2011 14:00 | #2711 Canonswhitelensesrule wrote in post #13386787 ![]() Ahh ok...my bad. Didn't mean to put words into your mouth. ![]() I've actually thought what I THOUGHT what you meant, a few times myself. That the subject in the "resulting" photograph doesn't look the same that it/they did in the "setup" shot. (Different pose, position, etc). ![]() I want to see the actual photograph that resulted from the setup shot. no worries.... but it's possible that after seeing the picture that I could come up with the same conclusion as you.....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
moeronn Goldmember 2,516 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: SoCal More info | Nov 11, 2011 14:05 | #2712 Canonswhitelensesrule wrote in post #13386787 ![]() Ahh ok...my bad. Didn't mean to put words into your mouth. ![]() I've actually thought what I THOUGHT what you meant, a few times myself. That the subject in the "resulting" photograph doesn't look the same that it/they did in the "setup" shot. (Different pose, position, etc). ![]() I want to see the actual photograph that resulted from the setup shot. Without having two cameras fire simultaneously, that is very difficult to do.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paradiddleluke Goldmember ![]() 3,594 posts Likes: 108 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Nov 11, 2011 14:21 | #2713 what Moeronn said haha, and I wasn't too keen on the actual result of that pose but I believe my camera position and flash position was the same as the above shot so I posted it though the pose is different Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Canonswhitelensesrule Goldmember ![]() 3,648 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Surrey, B.C. More info | Nov 11, 2011 14:23 | #2714 Hey no harm no foul. Photographers do it in 1/1,000th of a second...but the memory lasts forever!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hinson Goldmember ![]() More info | Nov 11, 2011 14:27 | #2715 Luke; how are you powering the flash? In the setup photo, I don't see a receiver of any nature attached. Artist tools: Lumix FZ1000 (Canon 60D, 28/2.8, 10-22mm, Tamron 28-300mm VC ALL NOW FOR SALE - REASONABLE OFFER)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is Jimmymod67 355 guests, 146 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |