I've had the 16-35 II for a while now and like it a lot. It's pretty handy to be very wide and still get to a not bad focal length for a spontaneous portrait. That said, I'm at 16mm nearly all the time it's on my camera.
So it leaves me to wondering if I wouldn't rather have the 14mm. That much wider, probably a bit more crisp, smaller and lighter, etc. But I'd want to hang on to the 16-35 because that flexibility is sometimes necessary. This leaves me to choke on the price of the 14.
So . . . anyone else use it for weddings and was it worth it to you? Or should I just continue to just use the 16-35 as my UWA (knowing that I also have the Tokina 10-17 fish in the bag)?