I know it might be a heresy, but did actually anybody tried how Zeiss 100 MP compares to 85L?
ME. I had them both, albeit not at the same time, along with the 135L. I found the FL of the 100 much more useful than either, and in very very low light, I found the AF slowness and hunting so bad (on the Canons obviously) that I needed to manual focus anyway. I think the 100 ZE is sharper, better bokeh, better color and micro contrast -- and f2 is thin enough. I've got a 50 1.2 (in lieu of the 35L and 85L again) for when I want the 1.2.
Summary -- the Zeiss 100 is the best short tele I have ever used in 35 years. Better than my Leica R and M 90's.