I love my 135L and I love my 70-300L. Nothing wrong with them, great results, both brand new and hardly used, etc etc. There is no real reason to do it but it's an option and my brain weighs them all......
Sell the 135L and 70-300L and buy a 70-200 2.8 IS II.....
The 300 really isn't long enough anyways to miss it and in the future I could just pick up a 400 or 500 prime if I find I need/want it.
So apart from everything but image quality/bokeh, can the 70-200 effectively replace these two lenses? I know its heavy, etc but it seems like it might be better than carrying two lenses.....
Advice?