Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 17 Jan 2012 (Tuesday) 08:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Excessive Noise at ISO 400

 
Dingbat ­ Shutterbug
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 17, 2012 08:00 |  #1

I took my XSi and 70-200 f/2.8 MK I out in the snow yesterday, to capture some images of my daughter sledding. I was shooting at ISO 400, f/8, and roughly 1/1000 the whole time. When I got home and imported the prints to LR, I found that the pics were extremely noisy.

I've always had problems with noise at ISO 1600, and even a bit at 800, but I I've never seen it this bad at 400. A couple days earlier, I was shooting some studio stuff with a friend (a 5D shooter), and he was shocked at the noise present in my ISO 200 images. The noise in those pics was not noticeable to me naturally, but when he inverted the colors and started playing with the histogram (to ensure we got the background pure black), we could see there was quite a bit of noise, even at ISO 200.

Here's a sample from yesterday. These are the same image: the first SOOC, the second a roughly 100% crop. No processing except for whatever LR automatically performs based on the in-camera settings. They were shot in RAW. Any thoughts on the cause?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

_MG_2328-2.jpg (external link) by Dingbat Shutterbug (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

_MG_2328.jpg (external link) by Dingbat Shutterbug (external link), on Flickr



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,795 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16894
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jan 17, 2012 09:03 |  #2

That is not noise IMO. That looks like processing artifacts to me. I don't know anything about LR but I have seen this stuff with other processors. There was one a long time ago with a basketball and I think it was Capture One that was causing the same look.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dingbat ­ Shutterbug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 17, 2012 09:11 |  #3

Interesting thought. I'll try it in DPP this afternoon, and see what happens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,795 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16894
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jan 17, 2012 09:21 |  #4

I was just about to suggest that and you beat me to it.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,744 posts
Likes: 4074
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jan 17, 2012 09:27 |  #5

I agree, you are seeing the grain of the image, not noise. Noise are random colors. If you look at your image, all the pixels are of the same color pallet but different hues.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,795 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16894
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jan 17, 2012 10:15 |  #6

It would be nice to have a RAW file to play with.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8390
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Jan 17, 2012 10:48 |  #7

That's just awful, and simply shouldn't be happening with a properly exposed image at 400ISO. I hope you get this figured out. Makes me a little hesitant to start using LR.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,795 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16894
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jan 17, 2012 11:22 |  #8

People produce all types of good work with LR. Some part of PP or some setting is causing this. I'd be curious about the resizing method being used as well.

This one is mine. Made it up after 30 years in manufacturing. "The answer is always simple. Getting there is the hard part."

My favourite is Occam's Razor. "All things being equal the simplest explanation is usually the correct one". There are any variations to that and I have often found that it be true.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,323 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4214
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Jan 17, 2012 11:39 as a reply to  @ digital paradise's post |  #9

First off

Stop pixel peeping. No one is going to look at the shot at 100% except you

2nd

I agree with other,,not noise to me either. Go to your blue channel and that would be the tell tale sign

3rd

Not terribly uncommon. Ive had perfectly exposed images in the camera only too see stuff like this especially in a very blue no contrast sky. Happens and cleans up with a Gaussian blur or other noise reduction in Photoshop. Your seeing this all over the snow and areas that have no detail and or minimal contrast. Would be the same principal as far as I'm concerned so i really don't think there is that much of a problem. It does happen to the best of them.

4th

Stop pixel peeping. Once you processed this and made a print, it would never show

5th

very cute little girl. Go have some fun with her and your camera.:cool:


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dingbat ­ Shutterbug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 17, 2012 11:44 |  #10

I'll see what it looks like in DPP this afternoon, and I'd be happy to share the RAW with you. You can PM me your email address, if you'd like, and I'll send it along this afternoon.

I applied no PP aside from the crop and resize, and whatever processing LR performs automatically. And it looked this grainy prior to resizing. Resizing was done using the Publishing to Flickr feature in the Library module.

I forget which processing software we were using on Saturday, when we were looking at the ISO200 shots that were also noisier than expected...it was either PS or Corel. As I said, they were not nearly as noticeable as the photos above, but my buddy was pretty shocked.

"Properly exposed" may be a stretch ;-)a but I did not boost exposure in these prior to putting them up on flickr.

Looking forward to getting to the bottom of this. I love LR, and I'm hoping there isn't some sort of disconnect between my XSi's RAWs and LR. Then again, if I needed an excuse to upgrade to a 7D... ;-)a




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 17, 2012 11:48 |  #11

If you could upload a Raw file it would be good so we can check it out!

You can use a site like YouSendIt.com -- free, no membership required for uploading one at a time. Just enter your email address as the "Recipient", upload the file, they send you a notification with a link, which you post here and we can download it!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dingbat ­ Shutterbug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 17, 2012 11:50 |  #12

umphotography wrote in post #13719544 (external link)
First off

Stop pixel peeping. No one is going to look at the shot at 100% except you

2nd

I agree with other,,not noise to me either. Go to your blue channel and that would be the tell tale sign

3rd

Not terribly uncommon. Ive had perfectly exposed images in the camera only too see stuff like this especially in a very blue no contrast sky. Happens and cleans up with a Gaussian blur or other noise reduction in Photoshop. Your seeing this all over the snow and areas that have no detail and or minimal contrast. Would be the same principal as far as I'm concerned so i really don't think there is that much of a problem. It does happen to the best of them.

4th

Stop pixel peeping. Once you processed this and made a print, it would never show

5th

very cute little girl. Go have some fun with her and your camera.:cool:

I first noticed it when cropping some of the photos, not simply pixel peeping. When it becomes that evident as displayed on the screen, and my intent is for screen display, it becomes an issue even if it would look fine in 4x6. And if it's so far from the ordinary, I'd like to get a handle on why it's happening.

Can you elaborate on "go to your blue channel and that would be a tell tale sign" for a newb?

I've been blessed with a very expressive and photogenic child. "Wrapped around her finger" doesn't begin to describe the situation. Sledding was a total blast this weekend.

Thanks for the help.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dingbat ­ Shutterbug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
25 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 17, 2012 11:51 |  #13

tonylong wrote in post #13719596 (external link)
If you could upload a Raw file it would be good so we can check it out!

You can use a site like YouSendIt.com -- free, no membership required for uploading one at a time. Just enter your email address as the "Recipient", upload the file, they send you a notification with a link, which you post here and we can download it!

Thanks. I'll have it up in a few hours.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Jan 17, 2012 11:54 |  #14

Not noise; looks like a combo of using the Clarity slider a little too aggressively and then a slightly over-sharpening as well. At least this is usually what tells me I need to go back and redo those.

Otherwise, the image looks fine.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,795 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16894
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jan 17, 2012 12:00 |  #15

Good suggestion about yousendit Tony. Several people can take a crack at it. I also agree with umphotogtraphy that you will not likely see it in print. This is curious for us pixel peepers :) I normally do NR at 100% so those patterns would make me wonder when eventually I got to doing some high ISO NR. Not that the posted image needs any NR. Nice capture by the way.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,979 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Excessive Noise at ISO 400
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1890 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.