total time investment in my average wedding is in the 30 hour range
meeting, rehearsal, traveling, wedding day, editing, that quickly adds up...
SMP_Homer Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Feb 08, 2012 07:50 | #16 total time investment in my average wedding is in the 30 hour range EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digital paradise I still have 8 digits left ![]() More info | Feb 08, 2012 08:55 | #17 Good info here. Glad the question was asked. I sometimes wonder if I invest too much time. Now I know I don't. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
omnom Senior Member 364 posts Joined Jan 2009 More info | Feb 08, 2012 08:57 | #18 tim wrote in post #13847081 ![]() I've never taken a single photo that can't be improved with basic post processing - ie just what a raw converter does, brightness, contrast, color temp, etc. To nail every exposure is quite amazing, almost unbelievable. SMP_Homer wrote in post #13847991 ![]() There is something to be said for 'getting right in-camera' the odds of anyone getting a 6 hour wedding all right in-camera are against you... but even then, things can be improved... eyes can be made to pop... pimples can be removed... I'm not saying that I didn't edit the photos, I'm saying that my exposures are pretty bang on so I dont have to go back and fix the files. There's always color, contrast, sharpness, WB, etc done to the photos, but when the initial exposure is already there it goes a lot smoother as I dont have to spend extra time trying to save photos.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bigarchi Senior Member ![]() 962 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2008 Location: upstate ny More info | Feb 08, 2012 11:15 | #19 i usually spend about 30 hours on post work for a 10 hr wedding day (2 photographers shooting) ~Mitch
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 08, 2012 19:21 | #20 Thanks for all the comments everyone! Glad to know I am not totally off base. I actually enjoy taking the extra time to make sure my work is the best I can put out. 5D mk II, 50D, Canon 50mm 1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Sigma 85mm 1.4, Canon 24-105mm f4 L, Tamron 90mm f2.8 Macro, Canon 580 Ex II, Canon 430 Ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson ![]() More info | All depends on what you did and how many files you have to process. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer ![]() 51,009 posts Likes: 369 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Feb 08, 2012 21:30 | #22 I've tried LR 3 times and I just can't do it. I find Bridge much more flexible and much faster. It has pretty much the same image editing functions, and works with batches in a way I find more sensible. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kenclunk Member 46 posts Joined Sep 2011 Location: Cleveland More info | Feb 09, 2012 16:09 | #23 Using proper programs and workflow can definitely help. Ken Clunk | Director of Awesomeness | www.toomuchawesomeness.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
poza Member ![]() 38 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Upstate NY More info | Feb 09, 2012 19:24 | #24 It takes me 10-20 hrs gnphoto.zenfolio.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcolman Goldmember More info | Feb 15, 2012 14:32 | #25 Around 8 hours to select and edit the images for a typical wedding. Retouching album selects takes another couple of hours.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
brokensocial Senior Member 481 posts Joined Apr 2012 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Jun 05, 2012 08:05 | #26 From the date of our first wedding [mike and frida] photography - we shoot stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Michael1984 Senior Member 641 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Harrisburg, PA More info | Jun 05, 2012 08:44 | #27 depending on the size of the wedding... 6-10 hours of just editing , not including album design 5D MK II | 24-70 2.8L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnThomas Senior Member ![]() 401 posts Joined May 2012 Location: Long Island, New York More info | Jun 05, 2012 12:20 | #28 brokensocial wrote in post #14533616 ![]() I'm the bottleneck, as I'm having a lot of trouble culling down from 2900 images to around 400. I'm definitely shooting less at our next wedding. Holy Cow!! You can call me JT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
brokensocial Senior Member 481 posts Joined Apr 2012 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | Jun 05, 2012 12:49 | #29 JohnThomas wrote in post #14534758 ![]() Holy Cow!! To be fair, the 2900 came from both of us combined; I shot around 1600 and my wife around 1300 over a 10 hour wedding. However, we'd previously shot around 2300 for an 8 hour wedding, and that seemed more manageable. My goal for our next wedding is to shoot at an average rate of around 80 frames per hour, rather than 160 per hour, as I did in this previous wedding. That'll mean taking 400 images, give or take a few, over a 5 hour wedding. We'll see if I can pull it off. [mike and frida] photography - we shoot stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is Timus 831 guests, 184 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |