Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 10 Feb 2012 (Friday) 15:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Guess the lens

 
jkru617
Member
220 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Feb 10, 2012 15:50 |  #1

Can you guess what the lenses are below? No cheating by looking at exif

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7045/6853389641_0197f41fdb_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jkru617/6853389​641/  (external link)
hmm-1 (external link) by Jkru617 (external link), on Flickr


IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7027/6853393909_58bc29bffe_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jkru617/6853393​909/  (external link)
hmm-2 (external link) by Jkru617 (external link), on Flickr



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
robertwsimpson
Goldmember
Avatar
2,471 posts
Likes: 60
Joined Jun 2010
Location: West Palm Beach, FL USA
     
Feb 10, 2012 15:51 |  #2

85mm f/1.2?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
328iGuy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,623 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 717
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Ottawa | Ontario
     
Feb 10, 2012 15:54 |  #3

I say 50/1.2. Not enough glass for an 85?


EOS R5 | EOS R6 | EF 8-15L | RF 15-35L 2.8 | RF 24-70L 2.8 | RF 85L 1.2 | RF 70-200L 2.8 | RF 100-500L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jkru617
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
220 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Feb 10, 2012 15:57 |  #4

328iGuy wrote in post #13864177 (external link)
I say 50/1.2. Not enough glass for an 85?

Correct, but what is the one above it?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwsimpson
Goldmember
Avatar
2,471 posts
Likes: 60
Joined Jun 2010
Location: West Palm Beach, FL USA
     
Feb 10, 2012 15:57 |  #5

that was my other guess... trying to compare it to the back cap for scale.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Feb 10, 2012 16:34 |  #6

Are we to guess the lenses used to take the images (hence your comment about not inspecting the EXIF data), or the lenses that are the subjects?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwsimpson
Goldmember
Avatar
2,471 posts
Likes: 60
Joined Jun 2010
Location: West Palm Beach, FL USA
     
Feb 10, 2012 16:42 |  #7

well, I'm guessing if you check EXIF on the second photo, it'll have the lens pictured in the first one and vice versa.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Feb 10, 2012 17:28 |  #8

robertwsimpson wrote in post #13864449 (external link)
well, I'm guessing if you check EXIF on the second photo, it'll have the lens pictured in the first one and vice versa.

That's an interesting logical inference. If we assume that the comment about EXIF was not a mistake, a joke, or an intentional red herring, I think that must be true. In this case, just knowing where the answer could be found allows a huge number of possibilities to be excluded, for instance, that both images were taken with, for example, a 200/2L.

Mind you, the use of "lens", singular, in the thread title, provides quite the opposite interpretation. If the answer is unique, and the pictured lenses are different visually, the target must be the lens used to take the images, whether or not it is also one of those pictured (in the substance of another 'copy' of the taking lens.)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jkru617
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
220 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Feb 10, 2012 18:33 |  #9

xarqi wrote in post #13864674 (external link)
That's an interesting logical inference. If we assume that the comment about EXIF was not a mistake, a joke, or an intentional red herring, I think that must be true. In this case, just knowing where the answer could be found allows a huge number of possibilities to be excluded, for instance, that both images were taken with, for example, a 200/2L.

Mind you, the use of "lens", singular, in the thread title, provides quite the opposite interpretation. If the answer is unique, and the pictured lenses are different visually, the target must be the lens used to take the images, whether or not it is also one of those pictured (in the substance of another 'copy' of the taking lens.)

Very deep... But yes the first lens was shot using the 50L and the 50L was shot with the lens in the first picture.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aboss3
Goldmember
Avatar
2,616 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: LOS ANGELES
     
Feb 10, 2012 18:55 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

Haha definitely the 50mm f/1.2L :D


Gear | My gear is changing faster than I can update the signature
VoyageEyewear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
328iGuy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,623 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 717
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Ottawa | Ontario
     
Feb 10, 2012 20:33 |  #11

Yes I win! :lol:


EOS R5 | EOS R6 | EF 8-15L | RF 15-35L 2.8 | RF 24-70L 2.8 | RF 85L 1.2 | RF 70-200L 2.8 | RF 100-500L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Warlock
Senior Member
Avatar
505 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2011
Location: Stavanger, Norway
     
Feb 10, 2012 21:01 |  #12

First one, i dont know, but the second one i love, it's a 50mmL1.2 and the first one is shot with the 50mmL1.2. I'm going to guess 100mm f/2 as the first one.


Canon 60D, Canon 1100D , 17-40 4L , 24mm 1.4L II,Zeiss Distagon T*2/35 ZE,50mm 1.2L, 85mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 IS L, 50mm 1.8II, 18-55 III, 430 exII,TT Retrospective 20, Lightroom 4.
Set a pen to a dream, and the colour drains from it.
R.H. Barlow and H.P. Lovecraft
"The Night Ocean"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x.pozhr
Goldmember
Avatar
4,828 posts
Gallery: 324 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 806
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Chandler, Arizona
     
Feb 10, 2012 21:30 as a reply to  @ The Warlock's post |  #13

First one - 85 1.8..?


flickr (external link)
Gear List + Marketplace Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StructuredAmazing
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Feb 10, 2012 21:33 |  #14

jkru617 wrote in post #13864148 (external link)
Can you guess what the lenses are below? No cheating by looking at exif

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jkru617/6853389​641/  (external link)
hmm-1 (external link) by Jkru617 (external link), on Flickr
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script



QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jkru617/6853393​909/  (external link)
hmm-2 (external link) by Jkru617 (external link), on Flickr

looks like a 50mm 1.0


"Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil"
StructuredAmazing forever.
My website: Pending...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jkru617
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
220 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Feb 11, 2012 00:33 |  #15

p360 wrote in post #13865805 (external link)
First one - 85 1.8..?

Winner!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,835 views & 0 likes for this thread
Guess the lens
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is alpo2k
866 guests, 284 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.