Cool moon shot, gabebalazs! I like the details...and wow: 1200 mm...I have only tried at 200mm but 200mm, even on a crop body is not enough...Could you please share the name of the program you are using for the stacking process?
proletsearch Senior Member ![]() 795 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2011 Location: Nuernberg/Germany More info | Feb 14, 2012 10:25 | #796 Cool moon shot, gabebalazs! I like the details...and wow: 1200 mm...I have only tried at 200mm Canon EOS 600D gripped, Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mark II - Youtube
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkerr Goldmember ![]() 3,042 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA. More info | Feb 14, 2012 11:41 | #797 proletsearch wrote in post #13895849 ![]() Cool moon shot, gabebalazs! I like the details...and wow: 1200 mm...I have only tried at 200mm ![]() I don't believe he used any software for stacking. What he stacked were two 2x Tele-Converters to achieve the focal length he got. Tim Kerr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Beardy Hatchling 4 posts Joined Feb 2012 More info | Todd, Tony and Tim. Thanks for the feedback. I love the tips and will put them to good use as soon as these clouds get out of here.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Phil Scott Junior Member 21 posts Joined Jan 2009 More info | Feb 17, 2012 12:38 | #799 Just a couple of shots from the back garden when it was briefly clear last night. ![]() Night Sky 2 ![]() ![]() IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/60843428@N05/6890370089/ ![]() Night Sky 1 ![]() ![]()
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.n.a.f.u. Goldmember ![]() 2,769 posts Joined Jul 2009 Location: by a river in southern colorado More info | Feb 17, 2012 13:17 | #800 tkerr wrote in post #13858838 ![]() Typically a good starting figure for shutter speed before trailing will be noticeable is to divide 500 by the lens focal length. Or if you're using a Full Frame Camera try 600 by the focal length. It's not perfect but it will get you close. For Example with the 8-16mm Sigma @ 8mm on a camera with an APS-C crop sensor you can go as long as 62 seconds With the other lens at 17mm you can only go as long as about 30 seconds. how did you come up with the 500 or 600 divided by focal length figures? I'm just curious as i still don't know much about this. I'm Russ. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
proletsearch Senior Member ![]() 795 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2011 Location: Nuernberg/Germany More info | Feb 18, 2012 08:10 | #801 tkerr wrote in post #13896314 ![]() I don't believe he used any software for stacking. What he stacked were two 2x Tele-Converters to achieve the focal length he got. But if you want software for stacking astronomy images you can try Deep Sky Stacker. http://deepskystacker.free.fr/english/index.html ![]() Or for lunar and planetary images you can try Registax. http://www.astronomie.be/registax/ ![]() You can also check out wxAstrocapture. http://arnholm.org …/software/wxAstroCapture/ ![]() If you have Photoshop you can stack with that as well. If you have Photoshop CS5 Extended you can use Smart Object Stack Modes. Thank you for the detailed information. Very helpful! Canon EOS 600D gripped, Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mark II - Youtube
LOG IN TO REPLY |
After a few years of visual astronomy, I thought I'd have a go at a picture! I had to limit myself to lots of 2 second exposures as the 200 2.8 showed up star trails soon after, and apart form not quite nailing focus I'm reasonably happy with this!
Also managed this a couple of weeks ago...
5D3, 7D2, 1D3, 40D, 14 f2.8 Samyang, 17-40 L, 28-80 L, 70-200 2.8ii L, 200 2.8ii L, 200-400 L, 1.4 ii,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saiph Mostly Lurking 13 posts Joined Jan 2012 More info | I also got some more shots ![]() Andromeda ![]() ![]() And a cropped version of it. Still fooling around with a proper balance between noise reduction and sharpness ![]() IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/asa7or/6909735637/ ![]() Andromeda cropped ![]() ![]()
LOG IN TO REPLY |
VisualUniverse Senior Member More info | Nice work, Saiph! Website: VisualUniverse.org
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Brudei Hatchling 5 posts Joined Feb 2012 More info | Hi there
Jupiter, Venus and the moon.
Both taken on a Canon 500D f4, kit lens (18mm it says in the details) 8 second exposures, ISO 200 for Orion and Iso 800 for the second. Rob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Todd Lambert I don't like titles ![]() More info | Feb 24, 2012 20:26 | #806
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saiph Mostly Lurking 13 posts Joined Jan 2012 More info | Feb 26, 2012 07:14 | #807 VisualUniverse wrote in post #13934038 ![]() Nice work, Saiph! Thanks for that feedback
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Todd Lambert I don't like titles ![]() More info | Feb 26, 2012 16:09 | #808 Thanks, yes.. I went a bit too long, it was so dark out there, I couldn't get the exposure I wanted and I was pointing south, so of course I should have been even less.. 8-(
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jim Shaffer Junior Member 25 posts Joined Jan 2012 More info |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is EndaGeorge 742 guests, 294 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |