Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 28 Jun 2008 (Saturday) 13:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM -SIGMALUX-

 
short_wave
Senior Member
Avatar
674 posts
Likes: 54
Joined Jan 2011
Location: DFW
     
Feb 15, 2012 21:14 |  #7516

Jasper Ash wrote in post #13905015 (external link)
Just put the order through for mine on B&H. I bought new for piece of mind incase I get one of the bad copies. Can anyone suggest a good way to check the lens for focusing issues once I receive it?

Hey man! Fellow WFC member here. ;)

I got mine for Adorama for that same reason and I still have front focus issues. Instead of cluttering this thread up with my test shots, I created a new thread that shows how I'm testing.

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1149510

Hope you get a good copy man!


Feedback
www.john-benitez.com
insta: @johnbenitez

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jasper ­ Ash
Member
Avatar
130 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
     
Feb 15, 2012 23:48 |  #7517

Heyy!! I'll track your other thread. Hopefully you get things worked out! And hopefully I get a good copy! :D


flickr (external link) | Vimeo (external link) | Photo Blog (external link) | Daily Detergent (external link)
Canon 5D Mark II x 40mm f/2.8 STM x 50mm f/1.4 USM x 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BananaRaw
Senior Member
Avatar
429 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2011
Location: BELGIUM
     
Feb 16, 2012 09:48 |  #7518

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7183/6886676525_a0459d78ba_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/bananaraw/68866​76525/  (external link)
Hang on.. (external link) by BananaRaw  (external link), on Flickr


::: Gear :::
::: Flickr (external link) ::: 500px (external link) ::: Tumblr. (external link) :::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mosesport
Goldmember
Avatar
1,172 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SLC, UT
     
Feb 16, 2012 13:05 |  #7519

UGH! Need some advice ASAP if anyone can help. My biggest fear was realized today. Got my 5D body in the mail today. Popped the Sigma 50 1.4 on. Took some test shots. This is a 100% crop at f1.4. Do I need to send the body AND lens into Canon for calibration, or do you think it's an issue with the lens specifically? I can post more samples if necessary. The focus was directly on the "burn" part of heartburn.


IMAGE: http://i40.tinypic.com/2wd7fa8.jpg

Canon 5D Mark II - Konica Autoreflex TC - Nikon F4 - Leicaflex SL - Summicron-R 50mm f2 - Elmarit-R 135mm f2.8
---------------
flickr (external link) | 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
h4ppydaze
Goldmember
1,329 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2011
     
Feb 16, 2012 14:13 |  #7520

mosesport wrote in post #13909225 (external link)
UGH! Need some advice ASAP if anyone can help. My biggest fear was realized today. Got my 5D body in the mail today. Popped the Sigma 50 1.4 on. Took some test shots. This is a 100% crop at f1.4. Do I need to send the body AND lens into Canon for calibration, or do you think it's an issue with the lens specifically? I can post more samples if necessary. The focus was directly on the "burn" part of heartburn.


IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

I would suggest sending it in with body if you can live without your camera for a week and a half. Since the 5D has no microadjust (unless you're referring to the mkii) you'll have a much better chance of getting it perfectly calibrated sending it in with body. If you have the mkii, lens by itself should be fine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
short_wave
Senior Member
Avatar
674 posts
Likes: 54
Joined Jan 2011
Location: DFW
     
Feb 16, 2012 14:14 |  #7521

Can you micro adjust on the 5DC? If so try that first.

I have heard mixed answers on whether to send in the body. Some Sigma reps say yes others say it's not necessary. Sigma should have a 5DC they can test on if you just send in the lens.


Feedback
www.john-benitez.com
insta: @johnbenitez

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ktownhero
Senior Member
313 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2011
     
Feb 16, 2012 14:14 |  #7522

mosesport wrote in post #13909225 (external link)
UGH! Need some advice ASAP if anyone can help. My biggest fear was realized today. Got my 5D body in the mail today. Popped the Sigma 50 1.4 on. Took some test shots. This is a 100% crop at f1.4. Do I need to send the body AND lens into Canon for calibration, or do you think it's an issue with the lens specifically? I can post more samples if necessary. The focus was directly on the "burn" part of heartburn.

Send it with your body, and send it to Sigma.. not Canon :P




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BryantFC
Goldmember
2,606 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2011
Location: New Orleans, LA
     
Feb 16, 2012 15:18 |  #7523

ktownhero wrote in post #13909659 (external link)
Send it with your body, and send it to Sigma.. not Canon :P

Yes. This. Send it to sigma. Looks very soft. They should be able to fix it.


Mamiya M645 1000S, Mamiya RZ67, Polaroid SX-70 Alpha, Polaroid 250 Auto Land Camera, Leica M3, Canon Elan II
www.bryantphethmanh.co​m (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/bryantphethmanh​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thorrulz
Goldmember
Avatar
3,814 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 465
Joined Jan 2009
Location: The Land of the "Go Big Red!"
     
Feb 16, 2012 18:41 |  #7524

If the one I'm trying out tomorrow performs well, I'll be adding it to my lens collection. Since it's in a retail store I should know right away. Hoping for the best.


Flickr (external link)
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mookalafalas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,150 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 598
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Southern Taiwan
     
Feb 16, 2012 18:43 |  #7525

mosesport wrote in post #13909225 (external link)
UGH! Need some advice ASAP if anyone can help. My biggest fear was realized today. Got my 5D body in the mail today. Popped the Sigma 50 1.4 on. Took some test shots. This is a 100% crop at f1.4. Do I need to send the body AND lens into Canon for calibration, or do you think it's an issue with the lens specifically? I can post more samples if necessary. The focus was directly on the "burn" part of heartburn.

IMO, it's hard to tell from that picture. Light on the subject looks very poor, and looks like ISO is up (i.e. could be a problem of iso and hand shake). Can't see your EXIF data, so can't say. I recommend a shot in good light (shoot the same side of the object that the light is hitting, in a well lit room), with shutter speed and ISO both at 100. Shoot at your subject head on (you are hitting the surface of the bottle a bit from above and the side), and I think you will better be able to judge.


Call me Al Gear Flickr (external link)
You don’t have to have a great lens to take great pictures—but it sure helps. –Ben Long

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
benee
Senior Member
551 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Southern NJ, USA
     
Feb 16, 2012 19:52 |  #7526

Mookalafalas wrote in post #13911038 (external link)
IMO, it's hard to tell from that picture. Light on the subject looks very poor, and looks like ISO is up (i.e. could be a problem of iso and hand shake). Can't see your EXIF data, so can't say. I recommend a shot in good light (shoot the same side of the object that the light is hitting, in a well lit room), with shutter speed and ISO both at 100. Shoot at your subject head on (you are hitting the surface of the bottle a bit from above and the side), and I think you will better be able to judge.

Yes, take a few more test pics in good light. It does look like a focus problem to me, though. After a little more testing, you should send the body and lens into Sigma for calibration. My Siggy 50 was calibrated by Sigma to a 5D. It is ridonkulously sharp and accurate on my 5D classic.


2 x 5Dc, XE-1
Canon 35 f2 USM IS, 135L
Fuji 18-55,
Feedback:https://photography-on-the.net …p=13251402&post​count=2973

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StudioAbe
BAAAAAAN!!!
Avatar
1,939 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 1033
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Westchester County, NY
     
Feb 16, 2012 20:10 |  #7527

mosesport wrote in post #13909225 (external link)
UGH! Need some advice ASAP if anyone can help. My biggest fear was realized today. Got my 5D body in the mail today. Popped the Sigma 50 1.4 on. Took some test shots. This is a 100% crop at f1.4. Do I need to send the body AND lens into Canon for calibration, or do you think it's an issue with the lens specifically? I can post more samples if necessary. The focus was directly on the "burn" part of heartburn.


QUOTED IMAGE

Looks like you did your research: heartburn pills in your reach just in case you need it.

Have it sent to Sigma for calibration. Ideally with the camera body as each camera is different even within the same model.



If it's in focus, it's pornography, if it's out of focus, it's art.
EOS R5 & 5DsR | + gear | StudioAbe (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OrangeImaging
Senior Member
Avatar
341 posts
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 16, 2012 20:18 |  #7528
bannedPermanent ban

BryantFC wrote in post #13910003 (external link)
Yes. This. Send it to sigma. Looks very soft. They should be able to fix it.

This happened with my Sigma 30mm, took 2 1/2 weeks from DFW, but obviously worth it. It gave me an excuse to play with all my film cameras for a few weeks too!


Flickr (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Winwin
Senior Member
702 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
     
Feb 16, 2012 21:24 |  #7529

f/2


IMAGE: http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/g350/winwinphoto/IMG_8031.jpg

Win.
Canon 5D Mark III, 100 f/2.8L Macro, 50 f/1.8 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mosesport
Goldmember
Avatar
1,172 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SLC, UT
     
Feb 16, 2012 21:59 |  #7530

Did some further testing, and it turns out it was a front-focusing issue. I've already processed the return through Amazon. I'm disappointed. It was this thread alone that sold me on the lens. Bummed out I got one of the bad copies. Rather than deal with the hassle of not having a camera for 2-3 weeks, I'm just getting my money back and looking elsewhere. I may grab this lens down the road again, but not until I have a camera body with AF micro-adjust. The manual focus is TACK SHARP! I've included a manual focus attachment just for kicks. http://www.flickr.com …6889685231/in/p​hotostream (external link)

I'll still be watching this thread like always. I love your guys' work!


Canon 5D Mark II - Konica Autoreflex TC - Nikon F4 - Leicaflex SL - Summicron-R 50mm f2 - Elmarit-R 135mm f2.8
---------------
flickr (external link) | 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,431,444 views & 171 likes for this thread, 1074 members have posted to it and it is followed by 51 members.
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM -SIGMALUX-
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is rickldewitt
1213 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.