Why are you now trolling about 7D's in a 5D3 thread?
theviper Senior Member ![]() 615 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Mar 03, 2012 14:49 | #1996 Why are you now trolling about 7D's in a 5D3 thread? http://www.flickr.com/photos/vinnyburns/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 03, 2012 14:49 | #1997 Where is the title fairy when it comes to trolls? Curator of the Bob's Pickle Emporium experience. -As always, One location to serve you better!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pekka El General Moderator ![]() More info | Mar 03, 2012 14:52 | #1998 Please, no personal attacks and also please try to keep on topic. Discussion is preferred over arguing and trolling The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RhysPhotograph.Me Senior Member ![]() 504 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2011 More info | Mar 03, 2012 14:53 | #1999 ![]() Raylon wrote in post #14015414 ![]() I guess you don't know much about lenses and how they have to be designed. a 24-70 with constant F/2 would probably weigh literally 5 pounds, No one would use it. It already called the brick for a reason because it weighs so much, Look at a Tamron 28-75 2.8 compared to the 24-70L, there isn't any reason why the 24-70L needed to be so big, especially as the new 24-70 is smaller yet reportedly allot sharper.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Drozz119 Goldmember ![]() 1,340 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, Pa More info | Mar 03, 2012 14:53 | #2000 Lets see... Rice Photography has been explaining to all of us how great the d7000 is. How bad the 5d3 is. How soft the 7d is. He has also informed us that the 5d3 is muddy or something like that. I think he posted a picture of a squirrel to really hammer his point across.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RhysPhotograph.Me Senior Member ![]() 504 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2011 More info | Mar 03, 2012 14:54 | #2001 ![]() theviper wrote in post #14015544 ![]() Why are you now trolling about 7D's in a 5D3 thread? Because the 5Diii samples are reminiscent of the 7D as has already been explained???
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 29 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Mar 03, 2012 14:57 | #2002 RhysPhotograph.Me wrote in post #14015580 ![]() Because the 5Diii samples are reminiscent of the 7D as has already been explained??? reminiscent of the 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Growingshort Senior Member 372 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2010 More info | Mar 03, 2012 14:57 | #2003 Tonyz wrote in post #14012025 ![]() I know. Last night I saws someone who happily declared that he had sold his 35L to fund the 5D3 preorder. The stupidity is mind blowing. I'll sell my children before I sell my 35L... Nick S.|5D Classic|Nifty 50 |35L|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Raylon Goldmember ![]() 1,078 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Plainfield, IL More info | Mar 03, 2012 14:57 | #2004 RhysPhotograph.Me wrote in post #14015568 ![]() Look at a Tamron 28-75 2.8 compared to the 24-70L, there isn't any reason why the 24-70L needed to be so big, especially as the new 24-70 is smaller yet reportedly allot sharper. With some clever engineering I don't see why they couldn't make an F2 24-70 that's the same size as the current brick is now. Also the 70-200 is a huge lens, people still use it... Like I said, you obviously don't understand how lenses work. The front element would have to be much much larger than it currently is. Just look at the difference on the front element going from the 50mm 1.4 to the 50mm 1.2. It's much larger, and that's not even a full stop of light difference. But 2.8 to 2 is a full stop. You can't use 'clever engineering' to magically let a stop more light in from same sized elements. 7D l Canon 70-200 f/4L IS l Canon 85mm f/1.8 l ∑ 17-50 f/2.8 l Canon 50mm f/1.8 II l S95
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KCY Unlocked the hidden 117 point AF ![]() 7,170 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jun 2009 Location: I wish I knew... More info | Mar 03, 2012 14:58 | #2005 RhysPhotograph.Me wrote in post #14015580 ![]() Because the 5Diii samples are reminiscent of the 7D as has already been explained??? and has been explained to you more than once that all the canon sample shots have always been bad... KC - The Circle of PoTN - Member of the UCPC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KCY Unlocked the hidden 117 point AF ![]() 7,170 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jun 2009 Location: I wish I knew... More info | Mar 03, 2012 14:59 | #2006 Raylon wrote in post #14015602 ![]() Like I said, you obviously don't understand how lenses work. The front element would have to be much much larger than it currently is. Just look at the difference on the front element going from the 50mm 1.4 to the 50mm 1.2. It's much larger, and that's not even a full stop of light difference. But 2.8 to 2 is a full stop. You can't use 'clever engineering' to magically let a stop more light in from same sized elements. how dare you use logic and physics!! KC - The Circle of PoTN - Member of the UCPC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vipergts831 Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy? ![]() 43,935 posts Gallery: 38 photos Likes: 235 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX More info | Mar 03, 2012 14:59 | #2007 |
alt4852 Goldmember ![]() 3,419 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Northern Virginia More info | Mar 03, 2012 15:00 | #2008 RhysPhotograph.Me wrote in post #14015568 ![]() With some clever engineering I don't see why they couldn't make an F2 24-70 that's the same size as the current brick is now. physics. 5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TooManyShots Cream of the Crop 10,203 posts Likes: 525 Joined Jan 2008 Location: NYC More info | Mar 03, 2012 15:01 | #2009 ![]() Drozz119 wrote in post #14015574 ![]() Lets see... Rice Photography has been explaining to all of us how great the d7000 is. How bad the 5d3 is. How soft the 7d is. He has also informed us that the 5d3 is muddy or something like that. I think he posted a picture of a squirrel to really hammer his point across. Aside from that.. nothing really
One Imaging Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RhysPhotograph.Me Senior Member ![]() 504 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2011 More info | Mar 03, 2012 15:04 | #2010 ![]() Raylon wrote in post #14015602 ![]() Like I said, you obviously don't understand how lenses work. The front element would have to be much much larger than it currently is. Just look at the difference on the front element going from the 50mm 1.4 to the 50mm 1.2. It's much larger, and that's not even a full stop of light difference. But 2.8 to 2 is a full stop. You can't use 'clever engineering' to magically let a stop more light in from same sized elements. Well Canon can seemingly shrink the 24-70 down, yet while improving IQ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is Yekeen Jamiu 961 guests, 313 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |