Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Mar 2012 (Monday) 20:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

picked up a iphone4s selling my 5dmII

 
jaycky
Goldmember
Avatar
2,089 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Bancouver okanagan alberta
     
Mar 12, 2012 20:11 |  #1

Yea so this thread is a troll but the video compares to that of the 5dmII which blows my mind...

http://vimeo.com/30606​785 (external link)

i had a billion fido dollars so got a free iphone4s


5DM2 /grip Lots Of L's
measurbating f-stops
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/52633882@N07/ (external link)
http://about.me/jbmpho​tos (external link)
http://photobyfish.tum​blr.com/archive (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
davidc502
Goldmember
Avatar
3,459 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 38
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tennessee
     
Mar 12, 2012 20:24 |  #2

I think the video from the 5dmk2 is far better than the iphone 4s. And think about it... the winning video is from a Camera!


_
My Gear is ---> Here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saintz
Senior Member
428 posts
Joined Mar 2012
     
Mar 13, 2012 08:33 |  #3

Given the massive handicap of the iPhone (price, lens size, sensor size) it is very impressive. The low light performance is really amazing. I would like to see that same quality and technology in something like a 4/3 camera that isn't quite so handicapped, physically speaking.


Sony A6000 | 18-55 | 16-50 | 50 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tete
Senior Member
Avatar
275 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Arizona
     
Mar 13, 2012 08:55 |  #4

saintz wrote in post #14077496 (external link)
I would like to see that same quality and technology in something like a 4/3 camera that isn't quite so handicapped, physically speaking.

Does a m43rd vs RED count?

Video (external link)


Nikon D700, 28-70 f2.8 Nikkor, 17-35mm Nikkor, 50mm 1.8 Nikkor, 28mm f2.8 Nikkor, Panasonic G3, Panasonic 14-45mm Lumix, Panasonic LX3, Canonet, 4 speedlites, some remotes some umbrellas, some stands, some cables and a few bags.
My website with old terrible low res pictures that I'll update at some point. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lefteris ­ Katsantonis
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
19 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Cyprus
     
Mar 13, 2012 09:01 |  #5

Unbelievable! For sure 5d2 is better but I am surprised with what the iphone can do.


Wedding Photographer Cyprus (external link)
Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ One ­ Pixel ­ Wonder
Member
80 posts
Joined Nov 2011
     
Mar 13, 2012 09:12 |  #6

davidc502 wrote in post #14075059 (external link)
I think the video from the 5dmk2 is far better than the iphone 4s. And think about it... the winning video is from a Camera!

The 5D definitely looks better just as expected, but I think the surprising thing is that the iPhone in less than 5 years has become this good!


TOPW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,243 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 311
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Mar 13, 2012 09:13 |  #7

Lefteris Katsantonis wrote in post #14077613 (external link)
Unbelievable! For sure 5d2 is better but I am surprised with what the iphone can do.

Yassou Lefty.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon Pixma PRO-10 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HyperYagami
Goldmember
2,405 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
     
Mar 13, 2012 09:17 |  #8

IMAGE: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Vr8Xl0cbUZA/SVo0vYlRelI/AAAAAAAAFd0/uq7Vqop-CiU/s400/Image%20=%20old%20news%20is%20so%20exciting.jpg

https://photography-on-the.net …05114&highlight​=iphone+4s


5D3 and a few lens
es.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gregg.Siam
Goldmember
Avatar
2,383 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Bangkok
     
Mar 13, 2012 09:47 as a reply to  @ HyperYagami's post |  #9

I absolutely LOATHE taking pics with my iphone. Absolutely horrible noise in even the best of conditions and shutter lag so great I could send a kid to China and raise them to the age of 18 before it completes.

With that said, I do find the 1080 video from the iphone to be of better quality than the images (not saying much, but still decent). I have no idea why, it just looks decent for such a small sensor.


5D MKIII | 24-105mm f/4 L| 50mm f/1.8 | 600EX-RT [FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=bl​ue][FONT="]|
∞ 500px (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,297 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Mar 13, 2012 09:50 |  #10



LOL!!!!!


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevindar
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,050 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2007
Location: california
     
Mar 13, 2012 10:05 |  #11

5d2 is shot between f7 and f22. the video as displayed are are what 720x480? really? Is it surprising that there is not a big difference at that size and setting? Iphone may do well for a camera phone for video, but I will still take my Panasonic lx-5 over it any day, and 5d2 is in a different league entirely.


My Flickr (external link)
Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205576

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saintz
Senior Member
428 posts
Joined Mar 2012
     
Mar 13, 2012 10:51 |  #12

tete wrote in post #14077581 (external link)
Does a m43rd vs RED count?

Video (external link)

That's a nearly $1,000 camera and $2,500 lens, bigger than my arm. I'd like to see something roughly pocket size with a total price of under $500. If something marketed as a telephone can do that well as a camera, I have to believe that something built specifically to be a camera can do a whole lot better than what's out there now in the range I described.


Sony A6000 | 18-55 | 16-50 | 50 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drive_75
Senior Member
748 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: California
     
Mar 13, 2012 11:33 |  #13

I see a huge difference. Just one scene in the alley, trash cans from iphone have color. There's more details in the 5D2 video. iPhone is okay but they are not close.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
N2bnfunn
Senior Member
Avatar
758 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 86
Joined Dec 2010
     
Mar 13, 2012 11:42 |  #14

Let me guess what you going to try to shot a wedding using a Iphone 4S LOL. Trust me I have both .


Canon EOS R EF 70-200 L 2.8 L 24-70 2.8L II Canon Pixma PRO-1 3 Canon 600EX-RT Speedlites

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,642 posts
Likes: 134
Joined Dec 2010
     
Mar 13, 2012 12:04 |  #15

I've got the iPhone, with the $69 Olloclip lens it's a nice package for casual photos.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,633 views & 0 likes for this thread
picked up a iphone4s selling my 5dmII
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mike1911
877 guests, 241 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.