They look great to me.
They look great to me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
5Dmaniac Goldmember  1,303 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Mar 17, 2012 23:48 | #122 If these are 100% crops then they look pretty bad! I suspect these higher than 100% though!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 17, 2012 23:49 | #123 5Dmaniac wrote in post #14105496  If these are 100% crops then they look pretty bad! I suspect these higher than 100% though! i agree those shots make me want to puke.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BryantFC Goldmember 2,606 posts Likes: 11 Joined Jun 2011 Location: New Orleans, LA More info | Mar 18, 2012 00:09 | #124 Fricks wrote in post #14105498 i agree those shots make me want to puke. Agreed! Mamiya M645 1000S, Mamiya RZ67, Polaroid SX-70 Alpha, Polaroid 250 Auto Land Camera, Leica M3, Canon Elan II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
newbieincs Member 37 posts Joined Jun 2010 More info | I got those crops by shooting full res in jpg, default nr and landscape picture style in default setting. Then cropped out a 450x450 box in dpp for crop1 and 500x500 box for crop2 and crop3. Those crops were uploaded to flickr and posted here in 450x450 or 500x500. Shooting at f/8 could have played a part in the loss of detail of crop1.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thedcmule2 Goldmember 1,125 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2011 More info | Mar 18, 2012 00:24 | #126 Anyone have any decent photos with this thing besides noise testing? lol.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wookiee2cu Senior Member 614 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Seattle, WA. More info | Mar 18, 2012 00:30 | #127 those look pretty decent to me, can't wait for mine to show up!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
feigenbaum Member 134 posts Joined Jul 2010 More info | Mar 18, 2012 02:17 | #128 Any video? Hasselblad 500c/m ... 5D MARK 2 (ordered) ... 40D ... 17-40 L ... 35mm f/2 ... 70-200mm f/4 L ... plus other film equipment
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Joe.Recon Senior Member  674 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: 45°25'26.8"N 75°41'56.5"W More info | Here is what I want to know: Canon 5D MkIII powered through the following Canon lenses: 16-35 f2.8 L MkII, 24-70 f2.8 L MkII, 70-200 f2.8 L MkII, 17mm TS-E f4 L, 24mm TS-E f2.8 L MkII and 85mm f1.2 L MkII.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
marekp Member 44 posts Likes: 30 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Estonia More info | Mar 18, 2012 04:00 | #130 ChinaVol, how' s 5dmk3 compared with 1d4?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
newbieincs Member 37 posts Joined Jun 2010 More info | For those that complained about the lack of detail in the night iso test...may I know how should a detailed shot look like? I retested in bright day light and got the same result...I tried the same shot with the m4/3 and got worse result...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
efoo Member 208 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Mar 18, 2012 05:10 | #132 newbieincs wrote in post #14106057 For those that complained about the lack of detail in the night iso test...may I know how should a detailed shot look like? I retested in bright day light and got the same result...I tried the same shot with the m4/3 and got worse result... I mean the green sign board is really really tiny, taking up just a small portion of the frame. It might be difficult to resolve the detail. If you look at the house and fence in crop 1, it seems to be pretty alright, or should it be even better? Anyway, I will try agan tonight with another lens... I agree with you. I think the reason the crop 1 and crop 2 photos appear lack of detail is because they are not on the field of focus of the lens. The number "4" on the building in crop 3 photos are on the field of focus and appears sharp. Canon XTi/400D | Canon 50mm f/1.8 MkII | Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OS | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 | Canon 430EX | Canon PowerShot S2 (broken) | Canon PowerShot A70
LOG IN TO REPLY |
theviper Senior Member  615 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Mar 18, 2012 06:06 | #133 Fricks wrote in post #14105498 i agree those shots make me want to puke. Do they really? http://www.flickr.com/photos/vinnyburns/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
theviper Senior Member 615 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Mar 18, 2012 06:09 | #134 newbieincs wrote in post #14106057 For those that complained about the lack of detail in the night iso test...may I know how should a detailed shot look like? I retested in bright day light and got the same result...I tried the same shot with the m4/3 and got worse result... I mean the green sign board is really really tiny, taking up just a small portion of the frame. It might be difficult to resolve the detail. If you look at the house and fence in crop 1, it seems to be pretty alright, or should it be even better? Anyway, I will try agan tonight with another lens... Just wanted to say that people here do appreciate you taking the time to post pics from the 5D3. http://www.flickr.com/photos/vinnyburns/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jonneymendoza Goldmember 3,789 posts Likes: 384 Joined Apr 2008 More info | Mar 18, 2012 06:28 | #135 Fricks wrote in post #14105498 i agree those shots make me want to puke. jog along Canon 5dmkIII | Canon 85L 1.2 | Sigma 35mm ART 1.4|Canon 16-35mm L 2.8 |Canon 24-70mm L f2.8 | Canon 70-200mm F2.8L MK2 | Canon 430EX MK2 Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is techkan 781 guests, 220 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
