70-200 f/4 non-IS.
Now looking at the 17-40, 24-105, 100-400 and 135... Damn you, addictingly awesome glass...
alex.hondsmerk Goldmember 1,547 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2011 Location: Nottingham More info | Mar 24, 2012 05:47 | #1261 70-200 f/4 non-IS. Gripped 50D, 24-105 f/4 L, 70-200 f/4 L, EF-S 17-85, 50 f/1.8 II "L"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Foggiest Senior Member 584 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2012 More info | Mar 24, 2012 06:13 | #1262 Looks lie a lot of people went with the 70-200 f4 non IS .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alex.hondsmerk Goldmember 1,547 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2011 Location: Nottingham More info | Mar 24, 2012 07:47 | #1263 Foggiest wrote in post #14144053  Looks lie a lot of people went with the 70-200 f4 non IS . It is a great way in to L class lenses , well built , nice usable zoom range , great IQ , reasonably priced . I think it might just have something to do with it being the cheapest... Consider it the 'gateway drug'! Gripped 50D, 24-105 f/4 L, 70-200 f/4 L, EF-S 17-85, 50 f/1.8 II "L"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jbrackjr Senior Member 516 posts Likes: 74 Joined Dec 2011 Location: Georgia, USA More info | Mar 24, 2012 08:05 | #1264 |
Mar 24, 2012 08:06 | #1265 24L II, wouldn't trade it in for the world Jon | JMBPhotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sskrnguy Member 172 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2011 More info | first L lens i bought was 24-70. but after 24-105 came out, i constantly took the 24-105 out unless i was shooting weddings indoor only. 24-105 is such a great all around and lightweight is a big plus especially on a bigger body with flash.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OneJZsupra Goldmember  2,378 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Guam More info | Mar 24, 2012 08:21 | #1267 |
Oct 01, 2012 22:42 | #1268 |
OneJZsupra Goldmember 2,378 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Guam More info | Oct 01, 2012 22:50 | #1269 jjaenagle wrote in post #15067903 i need another L. Don't we all = ) Gear List | Feed Back | My Site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 01, 2012 22:52 | #1270 17-40 was my first.. Great lens! | 5Dc | 7D | 1D3 | 1Ds3 | 17-40 4.0 | 28 1.8 | 40 2.8 | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 135 2.0 | ∑ 24-70 | ∑ 70-200 OS |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
erik.vossenaar Member 125 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2012 More info | Oct 02, 2012 01:56 | #1271 My first l was the 100-400. I bought it around 2002 for my EOS-3. I still use it and still love it. It have been with me to many places and has yielded me many great shots.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
plumgoo Senior Member 434 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Vienna, Austria More info | Oct 02, 2012 02:08 | #1272 Foggiest wrote in post #14144053 Looks lie a lot of people went with the 70-200 f4 non IS . It is a great way in to L class lenses , well built , nice usable zoom range , great IQ , reasonably priced . Exactly what I wanted to say, it was my first L lens, and actually I would recommend it as a first L lens to anyone. 60D | Canon 70-200L 4.0 | Canon 17-40L 4.0 | Canon 60 2.8 | Canon 85 1.8 | Sigma 30 1.4| Tokina Fisheye 10-17 3.5-4.5 | Walimax Pro 500 | Tamron 1.4x | Various other bits |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apisgogo Mostly Lurking 11 posts Joined Apr 2012 More info | Oct 02, 2012 02:41 | #1273 mine is 135L. i love it to death. Bokeh, sharpness and dead-on-focus is what this lens are for. Worth it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Had a 135L for a spell. Its a great lens. 7D | 8mm 3.5 FE | EF-S 10-22 | EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS | EX DC 30 1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is TumblingTiger 387 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
