I was toying with the idea of getting a 300mm or 400mm. I hear that Canon won't fix the 300 NON IS due to it being old. Was also looking at a 400mm 5.6, but not sure on either. Or even a 300 f/4, which is much cheaper... I'm so confused...
Pros and cons? (or should this be in the Lens thread?)
If you have the cash get the IS version of the 300/2.8.
However if your funds are limited then if you can get on Non IS version they are still fabulous lenses.
I have one which is 20 years old and is battered and bruised but flip it still works a treat.