My wedding and honeymoon is coming up in September on Kauai and I want to expand what I have in the way of lenses. I plan to take a lot of photos on this trip as well do nature, family and pet photography afterwards as well. I have a couple options and I'm stuck!
I can either A) purchase a 70-200L f4 (non is) and a 100mm macro f 2.8 (non is)
B) purchase the 70-200L f4 (IS version) by itself
it seems to me the is version would be sharper and a little more flexible being stabilized where as option A. would give me the option of macro in addition but the telephoto won't be as good.
I'm really stuck and I am not sure which option I'll get more use out of or better images with. I'd appreciate any thoughts! Thanks!