Sharing some more of Savanna's session...
LisaJH Goldmember ![]() 1,887 posts Gallery: 15 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 2255 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Kingman, Arizona - United States More info | Mar 30, 2012 04:00 | #6871 Sharing some more of Savanna's session... ~Mom of 11 and Professional Photographer~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cbknight Goldmember ![]() 1,767 posts Likes: 4 Joined Aug 2009 Location: East Texas More info | Mar 30, 2012 08:31 | #6872 LisaJH wrote in post #14179527 ![]() Sharing some more of Savanna's session...
![]() Love these two Lisa, Especially the first (Second in your post). The lines and DOF are awesome. Craig
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cbknight Goldmember ![]() 1,767 posts Likes: 4 Joined Aug 2009 Location: East Texas More info | Bluebonnets are out in Texas Craig
LOG IN TO REPLY |
USER876 Goldmember 1,616 posts Joined Jul 2008 More info | Mar 30, 2012 08:54 | #6874 Love the blue bonnets! I wish the background was a little brighter. Her skin looks little orange in the first one (fake tan?).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cbknight Goldmember ![]() 1,767 posts Likes: 4 Joined Aug 2009 Location: East Texas More info | Mar 30, 2012 09:08 | #6875 USER876 wrote in post #14180199 ![]() Love the blue bonnets! I wish the background was a little brighter. Her skin looks little orange in the first one (fake tan?). Your right....too warm. Cooled it down then warmed hands/arms to match face tones. Craig
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Monkey Mash Button Senior Member ![]() 267 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Mar 30, 2012 10:01 | #6876 New To Senior Portrait Guy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 30, 2012 10:47 | #6877 JFusion wrote in post #14177694 ![]() I must be reading that wrong. You're not going to get f2 DoF on a f2.8 lens with an ND. It doesn't work that way. Yeah, i think you are. Not saying you can get F/2.0 with a F/2.8. Its the creamy blur look from a F/2.0 i was talking about. But i will tell you that you can put an ND on an F/2.8 lens and get it to underexpose. slow the shutter and raise the iso and get awesome results. I do it all the time when im in lower light with a 70-200.....straight off the camera lighting and Blur
Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Mar 30, 2012 10:55 | #6878 Monkey Mash Button wrote in post #14180518 ![]() New To Senior Portrait Guy seeks advice from Excellent and Kind Photographers In This Thread I've been 'hired' to do senior pics for my identical twin nieces and the daughter-of-a-friend-of-my-wife. I've poked around this thread a bit (as well as other places) and would like your input on a few items: How many 'looks' do you typically shoot (different outfits/locations etc)? Do you try for a certian mix of portaits: i.e. full length, seated, waist up, head & shoulders? I am aiming for 25-40 usable pics. Is this reasonable or too much? Thank you for your consideration, Gordon Since they are identical twins just shoot one of them, duplicate and then flip the image in post
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JakAHearts Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | Mar 30, 2012 10:57 | #6879 Do the typical person in an empty frame image but use the twin and make it look like a mirror. Shane
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ckfishel2001 Goldmember ![]() 2,297 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cincinnati More info | Mar 30, 2012 11:03 | #6880 gonzogolf wrote in post #14180813 ![]() Since they are identical twins just shoot one of them, duplicate and then flip the image in post ![]() Since you put hired in quotes I'm guessing this is less a professional endeavor and more of a project so I would say don't worry about how many looks and sets the pro's use. Pay more attention to the time you feel like you can budget for the project and work backwards. Shoot as much as you have time for, but establish an expectation when you talk to your clients that they will see only the shots you deem worthy. This will allow you to shoot away, but still let them preview only a reasonable number of proofs. Kevin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LisaJH Goldmember ![]() 1,887 posts Gallery: 15 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 2255 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Kingman, Arizona - United States More info | Mar 30, 2012 11:08 | #6881 |
Monkey Mash Button Senior Member ![]() 267 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Mar 30, 2012 11:46 | #6882 gonzogolf wrote in post #14180813 ![]() Since they are identical twins just shoot one of them, duplicate and then flip the image in post ![]() Since you put hired in quotes I'm guessing this is less a professional endeavor and more of a project so I would say don't worry about how many looks and sets the pro's use. Pay more attention to the time you feel like you can budget for the project and work backwards. Shoot as much as you have time for, but establish an expectation when you talk to your clients that they will see only the shots you deem worthy. This will allow you to shoot away, but still let them preview only a reasonable number of proofs. Flipping in post was lol funny! I had thought to do an overlay piece and put three or four of each twin populating an outdoor cafe.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Mar 30, 2012 11:49 | #6883 Monkey Mash Button wrote in post #14181091 ![]() I'm not so worried as how many looks and sets the pros use per se. It's just that I don't want the clients to regret their decision to choose me; I don't want them to feel skimped even though it's pro bono work. Oh, and I definitely will only show them the worthies. Thank you for your thoughts! Shoot until you or they get tired then. Make it an adventure for them to whatever degree you can. Make it all about them, and they will be pleased with the choice.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JFusion Senior Member ![]() 851 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Dayton, Ohio More info | Mar 30, 2012 12:25 | #6884 umphotography wrote in post #14180761 ![]() Yeah, i think you are. Not saying you can get F/2.0 with a F/2.8. Its the creamy blur look from a F/2.0 i was talking about. But i will tell you that you can put an ND on an F/2.8 lens and get it to underexpose. slow the shutter and raise the iso and get awesome results. I do it all the time when im in lower light with a 70-200.....straight off the camera lighting and Blur Nice shot. Cool, you can definitely lower your exposure (2.8 to 2.0 ) throwing an ND on there, but you're not going to widen your aperture creating additional blur/bokeh. Jeremi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 30, 2012 12:36 | #6885 Monkey Mash Button wrote in post #14180518 ![]() How many 'looks' do you typically shoot (different outfits/locations etc)? Do you try for a certian mix of portaits: i.e. full length, seated, waist up, head & shoulders? I am aiming for 25-40 usable pics. Is this reasonable or too much? Thank you for your consideration, Gordon I took me a while to come up with an explanation with which I was happy and that clients would understand. I tell them it's like going fishing - it's not every trip out that you're going to walk away with a dozen trophy catches. And just like in fishing, I have "size" limits...if we get something too small, we're going to throw it back. I'm not going to hand over a few mediocre shots just to meet some arbitrary quota. That helps no one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is pdomag 764 guests, 228 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |