Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 03 Apr 2012 (Tuesday) 00:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

What are Canon's top 3 lenses for IQ?

 
dawnkyung
Senior Member
948 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Aug 2009
     
Apr 03, 2012 10:05 |  #16

I can only rate what I've used, so I say:

70-200 2.8 IS II
85L II
135L


dawn | 29 | gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
pulsar123
Goldmember
2,197 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 754
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Canada
     
Apr 03, 2012 10:30 |  #17

joeblack2022 wrote in post #14202404 (external link)
Your list is very similar to this one, only difference being the 100mm 2.8 IS Macro in 2nd place:

http://www.bobatkins.c​om …est_canon_eos_l​enses.html (external link)

I am not sure I trust the bobatkins.com user review based lens ratings - I don't know if the number of reviews is large enough, or if there is any bias in that site user base.

User ratings are in general not very accurate way to measure quality of a product (e.g., I wouldn't be surprised if users of very expensive brands would have a bias toward higher ratings, to justify subconsciously the huge premium they paid over competitor products; think of Apple users, Leica users etc.)

But if you stick with user-based ratings, B&H store web site has probably the largest statistics. E.g., comparing Canon's 17-55mm to Sigma 17-50 OS, we get

Canon 17-55: 4.7 stars, 97% recommend (based on >500 reviews);
Sigma 17-50: 4.6 stars, 97% recommend (based on 167 reviews; this is much newer product, hence the smaller statistic).

But on the Bob Atkins site, 17-55 is in the top 20, and Sigma is not.

Another strange point in the Atkins list: the not-so-good 18-135 is rated as high as 85mm f1.8. On B&H site, with huge statistics (e.g. >1000 ratings for 85mm), we get:

18-135: 4.4, 94%
85 f1.8: 4.7, 99%;

So 18-135 has significantly lower rating than the stellar rating 85mm lens.


6D, Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alpha_1976
Goldmember
Avatar
3,960 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: USA
     
Apr 03, 2012 12:57 |  #18

85L
100L
24L II


I know more about gear than I know about photography :p
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cherrymoon
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Apr 03, 2012 14:21 |  #19

Easy right ! The holy trinity : 35L + 85L II + 135L


5D² 40 pancake | 50/1.4 | 85L II | 135L | 16-35L IS | 24-105L | 70-200 f2.8 L IS II and a TT bike
Complete Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
facedodge
Goldmember
Avatar
1,193 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Silver Spring, MD (DC Suburb)
     
Apr 03, 2012 15:02 |  #20

x_tan wrote in post #14200857 (external link)
200 f/2, 300 f/2.8 IS, 400 f/2.8 IS.

Time to saving up bit more.

Yes, please.


Gear List | Feedback | facebook (external link) | [URL="http://www.flick​r.com/photos/wmcy2/"]flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hairy_moth
Goldmember
Avatar
3,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 16
Joined Apr 2009
Location: NJ
     
Apr 03, 2012 15:27 |  #21

BaghdadFred wrote in post #14201159 (external link)
The 70-200 f/4 is better IQ than the Fabled 70-200 f/2.8 IS II ???

That was certainly the case with the last generation of 70-200 f/2.8L lenses, but it is not with the current 70-200 f/2.8L IS II lens.

But just to double check, I looked at this tool (external link), comparing various focal lengths at f/4.0. In every case, the f/2.8 wins (the center is almost identical, but away from the center, the difference is obvious). At f/8, the result is the same, but the difference is less apparent.

I know that the tool is not perfect, but that along with the reviews, the general anecdotal evidence here on POTN and elsewhere: I tend to think the 70-200 f/2.8L IS II wins hands down.


7D | 300D | G1X | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 | EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro | EF 85mm f/1.8 | 70-200 f/2.8L MkII -- flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
3,514 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Australia
     
Apr 03, 2012 18:24 |  #22

If you speak to those that don't shoot Canon I think you'll find most are appreciative of Canon's ability to make great supertele lenses. I believe that says a lot about about where Canon's specialty lies.

A comparison between lenses of vastly different types is a waste of time, but comparing the range of Canon glass to that of the other brands is more telling.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,606 posts
Likes: 415
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
Apr 03, 2012 18:44 |  #23
bannedPermanent ban

Ken Nielsen wrote in post #14200789 (external link)
I've heard that the 24mm TS lens is one of the top 3.

For the lenses I use I rate

1. the 500 f/4

2. the 45mm TS

3. the 135 L (which I sold as it does not fit my use, but is still worthy of top 3 rating IMHO.)


What do you think?

I believe this will be subjective to some degree as we all have a top 3 rating for IQ. So, maybe, through postings here, the top three will rise to the top.

Remember, this is for IQ and that is all.

Define IQ.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
j-dogg
Goldmember
1,292 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Apr 2011
     
Apr 03, 2012 19:06 as a reply to  @ Hogloff's post |  #24

18-55 f3.5-5.6
28-90 f3.5-5.6 USM
22-55 USM


5D / 400d / 70-200-4LIS / 50 Mk.I / 28-70
RB67 Pro-S / 50-90-180 Holy Trinity, 120/polaroid back
Graphic View I 4x5 / Schneider 180 / Meyer 135 / Ektar 127

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sloanbj
Senior Member
Avatar
297 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
     
Apr 03, 2012 19:07 |  #25

You would need a precise definition of IQ and objective way to measure it in each Canon lens in order to rank them and discover the top three. All the responses here are just subjective opinions based largely on what people like and with little or no explanation, even subjective explanation, as to why they think they have the best image quality.

In the meantime, you could easily narrow your focus by looking at prime lenses in mid-range focal lengths in the L series. Wide angle and telephoto lenses generally have lower IQ compared to mid range FL for a variety of reasons. This reasoning would lead you toward lenses like the 35L, 50L and 85L.


Flickr (external link) 5Dii * Canon 50 * 85 * 17-40L * 24-105L * 180L * 100-400L * 580ex ii
Film: Contax | Rolleiflex | Pentax

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,426 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 346
Joined Sep 2011
     
Apr 03, 2012 19:23 as a reply to  @ Hogloff's post |  #26

Interesting, I was thinking the EFS 60 should be on the list so I started looking at the photozone numbers and indeed it does get a higher top score than the 85L, 70-200 II and even 100L. However then I noticed the Sigma 17-50 has even a higher score yet.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
16,042 posts
Gallery: 180 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 6230
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, now in Washington state, road trip back and forth a lot, with extensive detouring
     
Apr 03, 2012 21:48 |  #27

135 f2
300 f2.8
800 f5.6


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,505 posts
Likes: 3436
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Apr 03, 2012 22:08 |  #28

1. Between 300 and 400mm f2.8 IS I, 400mm f2.8 IS all the way.
2. 135mm f2 naa it is ok but I will take 200mm f2
3. 85L


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 276
Joined Nov 2011
     
Apr 06, 2012 00:35 |  #29

rick_reno wrote in post #14202233 (external link)
300 2.8, 85 1.2 and 100mm 2.8L

These


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shutterpat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,538 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Best ofs: 11
Likes: 8238
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Orange, CA.
     
Apr 06, 2012 00:45 |  #30

My 3 primes 400 F2.8L, 300 F4L IS and the 135 F2L.


Follow me --> https://www.instagram.​com/shutterpat/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

17,323 views & 0 likes for this thread
What are Canon's top 3 lenses for IQ?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Rower2021
840 guests, 265 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.