
Have your results also improved?
My possibilities have, I can now shoot in situations I couldn't before.
BugEyes Senior Member 577 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: Sweden More info | Apr 09, 2012 13:46 | #46 Hogloff wrote in post #14236190 ![]() Have your results also improved? My possibilities have, I can now shoot in situations I couldn't before. Kameras, lenses and other stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2012 16:26 | #47 Dorman wrote in post #14235737 ![]() Precisely, if you are a 5dmkii owner there are diminishing returns (IMHO) on the upgrade other than the AF system. However, coming from a 5dc both the mkii and mkiii offer a multitude of feature upgrades. I'm in the camp that feels if I am going to make the upgrade investment I would rather do it to the newest technology than to something I have bypassed for several years already. I came from a 5d2, which i really enjoyed as well, and now I have a 5d3. I love the new cam. and no it's not just the "honeymoon" phase. the improved AF is really that good. and the OTHER features more than make up for its supposed "lack" of improvement in IQ. I love all the customizable buttons, the DOF preview button is now in an awesome place. I use it to toggle between AI one shot and AI servo modes now and its so much more convenient. The auto ISO is also a life saver for me. When i had the 5d2, I would hate shooting with WIDE angle lenses in low light because the 5d2 would always make it 1/FL for the shutter speed. I would always be shooting at 1/24, 1/35, etc etc at iso 800 when I could have upped the ISO and increase the SS to avoid blur. Now the minimum SS feature fixes all of that. Body: Sony a7R IV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewK Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 09, 2012 17:52 | #48 If this is the last body you are going to buy for a while, jump up to the 3.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 10, 2012 06:54 | #49 BugEyes, Ilumo, MatthewK - you're adding fuel to the fire! I'm testing the waters with my 5dc up for sale locally.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Higgs Boson Goldmember 1,958 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Texas Hill Country More info | Apr 10, 2012 07:10 | #50 Hogloff wrote in post #14236190 ![]() Have your results also improved? I find it much easier to get certain shots with the iii over the ii. I have also found some pictures taken in Eval have been exposed more correctly over the image with more room to work in post with highlights and shadows, but sometimes not, it doesn't nail it every time, I don't expect it to.....I still prefer to spot meter and use manual when I can. A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewK Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 10, 2012 10:06 | #51 Fuel > fire Higgs Boson wrote in post #14240531 ![]() I find it much easier to get certain shots with the iii over the ii. I have also found some pictures taken in Eval have been exposed more correctly over the image with more room to work in post with highlights and shadows, but sometimes not, it doesn't nail it every time, I don't expect it to.....I still prefer to spot meter and use manual when I can. The AF is night and day. Absolutely... it's a whole new world with the AF. Say goodbye to "focus - recompose", those days are over. I'm being completely honest when I say that the 5D3 has locked onto everything I have pointed it at, using ANY focus point. It makes capturing what I want so much easier. The 5D2's center point was super accurate, now imagine having your view finder scattered with similarly performing points! (when you select to only show the cross-type points).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." ![]() More info | Apr 10, 2012 10:13 | #52 I'm not sure I understand what the problem is. You identify what you want to do that your current equipment cannot achieve (in the best of hands), then you buy the equipment that can. TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pbelarge Goldmember ![]() 2,837 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Westchester County, NY More info | Apr 10, 2012 10:47 | #53 rick_reno wrote in post #14227416 ![]() Go for the 5D3, it's the one you want and will hold it value nicely (for awhile). I agree with Rick, the DIII will hold it's value longer and is newer technology. You have a couple of nice lenses that will work with the body. You can always purchase the lenses at a later date to add to your equipment. just a few of my thoughts...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
moleman Member 76 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | Apr 10, 2012 19:58 | #54 In terms of IQ the original 5D is pretty close to the mark ii. I like the nice LCD and video features.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScottyC Member 31 posts Joined Mar 2012 Location: Roseville CA More info | Apr 10, 2012 21:59 | #55 The 5DII is a very good camera, but the 5D Mark III is that and MUCH MORE. Canon took something that was fighter and turned it into a warrior. I'm so pleased with it, that I think I'm not going to get the 1D-X now. Also, the 5DMark III is really a no-excuse camera. If you can't pull out a technically great image, then it's really the users fault. What I mean by this, is that this camera will absolutely not hold you back for what it is intended to be. This is a solid all around good camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2974 guests, 111 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |