Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 13 Apr 2012 (Friday) 15:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 600EX. Why did it take so long?

 
klimraamkosie
Senior Member
Avatar
900 posts
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Houston, TX
     
Apr 13, 2012 15:40 |  #1

I'm very new to photography and I'm looking at some videos about the system and I'm like "So the flashes communicate wirelessly instead of having to sense light bouncing from somewhere." I understand that that is a very good way to get them to flash without cables, smart for sure.

But is this "new" wireless technology so revolutionary? I don't get why it's taken this long. Please help me understand.

I have some background in hardware and electrical engineering (part of my studies at University) but I'm a software engineer by trade. So I'm somewhat aware of current technology.

The only problem I can see with why it has taken this long is the problem of latency, which they seem to have nailed.

Ideas?


Gear
500px (external link)
Feedback: Bought - Thinktank UD50. Sold - Canon 24-75.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlashZebra
This space available
Avatar
4,427 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Northern Kentucky
     
Apr 13, 2012 15:46 |  #2

Harvey lost the keys to the RF lab back in May of '87 and only recently found them (behind the Dairy Queen on Ross Street). Possibly this has some bearing on the delay.

Enjoy! Lon


*
http://flashzebra.com/ (external link)
*

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drvnbysound
Goldmember
3,316 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2009
     
Apr 13, 2012 15:52 |  #3

FlashZebra wrote in post #14260820 (external link)
Harvey lost the keys to the RF lab back in May of '87 and only recently found them (behind the Dairy Queen on Ross Street). Possibly this has some bearing on the delay.

Enjoy! Lon

bw!Nicely done!


I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
..::Gear Listing::.. --==Feedback==--
...A few umbrella brackets I own...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Kacey
Goldmember
Avatar
1,142 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2007
     
Apr 13, 2012 17:16 |  #4

Here is a guess....
Pocket Wizard (AKA Lab Partners Associates, Inc) dominated the ratio control market for digital remote radio photographic control devices with U.S. Patent No. 5,359,375. Since that patent is expired now, it allows other corporations such as Canon to use key features that are no longer protected to integrate similar microprocessors to communicate Photographic flash signals in a reliable and affordable way.

If not +1 for what Lon said :lol:


Kacey Enterprises (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SMP_Homer
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,709 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Mar 2008
Location: London, Ontario
     
Apr 13, 2012 18:49 |  #5

Canon was too busy not putting in IS into the 24-70


EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
Sig35A, Sig50A, Sig85A, Sig14-24A, Sig24-105A, Sig70-200S, Sig150-600C
100-400L, 100L, 100/2, 300 2.8L, 1.4x II / 2x II
600EX-II X3, 430EX-III X3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotographersWorldWide
Senior Member
395 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: UK
     
Apr 13, 2012 19:11 |  #6

J Kacey wrote in post #14261326 (external link)
Here is a guess....
Pocket Wizard (AKA Lab Partners Associates, Inc) dominated the ratio control market for digital remote radio photographic control devices with U.S. Patent No. 5,359,375.

Why have Quantum been able to do this over the years then, before PW ever got involved?

It seems the patent relies substantially on "Binary encoded sequenced pulses (are) transmitted from the transmitter to program (the) receivers remotely." Rather than the remote control of flashes using non-controllable receivers. Was the Patent THAT hard to get around? http://patents.justia.​com/1994/05359375.html (external link)

It just seems like laziness on the part of Canon (and Nikon) to let this pass by for so long and probably the driving force behind the move now is purely financial.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
inkista
Senior Member
Avatar
700 posts
Likes: 95
Joined Oct 2007
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
     
Apr 13, 2012 20:21 as a reply to  @ PhotographersWorldWide's post |  #7

I always assumed that it was all about the bandwidth. How long has 2.4GHz been cleared globally for wireless device use? Otherwise, they'd have had to engineer/test/manufact​ure units that operated on different frequencies for each market. There's a reason tvs and other media players use infrared remotes. RF bandwidth is regulated. Infrared isn't.

The other big change is that the Strobist only goes back to 2006. :) Prior to that, I'm willing to bet the demand for TTL-capable off-camera speedlight radio triggering was quite a bit smaller than it is today.


I'm a woman. I shoot with a Fuji X100T, Panasonic GX-7, Canon 5DmkII, and 50D. flickr stream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elv
Goldmember
1,491 posts
Likes: 181
Joined Jul 2006
     
Apr 13, 2012 23:48 as a reply to  @ inkista's post |  #8

Canon brought out a new ST-E3 but with no focus assist light... they just do this stuff to mess with your mind :D

You only have to look at any DSLR video blog to see all the whining about why they don't just implement the simple obvious things available a decade ago.


FLASHHAVOC.COM (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
inkista
Senior Member
Avatar
700 posts
Likes: 95
Joined Oct 2007
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
     
Apr 14, 2012 14:32 |  #9

elv wrote in post #14262792 (external link)
Canon brought out a new ST-E3 but with no focus assist light... they just do this stuff to mess with your mind :D ...

Or it could be because the ST-E3 has no lamp of any kind. The ST-E2 used the same near-IR lamp it did for master signalling for the focus-assist. Given that the light-based master unit has now been replaced by a radio-based transmitter might have something to do with the lack of focus assist. Last I heard, the Canon AF system doesn't focus on broadcast radio waves. ;)

From the Syl Arena videos (external link), it's kind of clear that Canon's saving money on retooling/production by using more or less identical components/form factor (and one assumes design) between the ST-E3 and the 600EX-RT. The ST-E3 is essentially a headless 600EX-RT. Downside, no AF assist. Upside, you don't have to learn two vastly different UIs for controlling your remote flashes, and you have identical mastering function.


I'm a woman. I shoot with a Fuji X100T, Panasonic GX-7, Canon 5DmkII, and 50D. flickr stream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotographersWorldWide
Senior Member
395 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: UK
     
Apr 14, 2012 16:02 |  #10

inkista wrote in post #14265486 (external link)
Or it could be because the ST-E3 has no lamp of any kind. The ST-E2 used the same near-IR lamp it did for master signalling for the focus-assist.


IR signalling and the AF-assist beam emitter were/are completely independent functions using totally independent light sources.

It is just stupid to not include a focus assist on the ST-E3, as it is stupid to not include a focus assist on other hotshoe radio devices.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Apr 14, 2012 22:33 |  #11

PhotographersWorldWide wrote in post #14265832 (external link)
IR signalling and the AF-assist beam emitter were/are completely independent functions using totally independent light sources.

It is just stupid to not include a focus assist on the ST-E3, as it is stupid to not include a focus assist on other hotshoe radio devices.

I know there will be times when I really want the focus assist on the STE3-RT.
Its one of those things that a product manager should have insisted on when the engineers started talking about what they could include to hit the price point.

I know from personal experience there are always compromises when designing a product and getting the engineering done so it can be brought to market.

Not sure what they could have left off, but the AF light was a poor choice.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Apr 14, 2012 22:56 |  #12

Licensing a radio device is a difficult thing. You have to get it approved in every country you want to sell your product in.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Apr 14, 2012 23:54 |  #13

picturecrazy wrote in post #14267367 (external link)
Licensing a radio device is a difficult thing. You have to get it approved in every country you want to sell your product in.

Which is why all these triggers are using an unlicensed frequency band.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Apr 15, 2012 10:21 |  #14

regardless, any radio device needs approval in every country, if you are going to sell it legally. even on the unlicensed frequencies.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeca42
Member
145 posts
Joined May 2011
     
Apr 15, 2012 13:57 |  #15

klimraamkosie wrote in post #14260785 (external link)
But is this "new" wireless technology so revolutionary? I don't get why it's taken this long. Please help me understand.

I think part of this is the growing popularity of small, off camera flash. People like Joe McNally, David Hobby and Syl Arena popularized the use of off camera hot shoe flash, especially outdoors. The Canon wireless system works well indoors, but outdoors you really want radio triggers. That created a demand for radio triggered flashes that justified Canon developing the technology.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,788 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Canon 600EX. Why did it take so long?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
3695 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.