So I have searched on here and cannot seem to find what I am looking for.
Currently I have a Canon T2i. I have the kit 18-55 IS lens, the 50 1.8, and a 70-300 non IS.
I was considering buying the Canon 17-55 f2.8, but a, wondering if the image quality is any better than the kit lens that I already have, or is the only diff the fact that I can shoot @2.8 through the full range of zoom?
I know that if I can shoot at 2.8 through the full range, that I can shoot at I believe up to 3 stops lower than the kit lens which def is good in lower light, and make the background blurry in most photos.
At my local shop the lens sells for $1099 CDN, and I am not sure if I really need the 2.8 or not....
Most of my shooting is action of my 16 month old shots, cars, and motorcycles mostly stationary, and some landscape.
I looked through the thread showing samples of this lens, but I am hoping that someone can tell me if this lens makes a pic quality diff over the kit one.