
wow, are you sure? Even at this size i can spot the onions...it's very obvious dude.
This is really turning into one of those Fuji X10 owners posting sample saying no 'white orbs' when they are clearly in the sample

All I see is a mint choc icecream
moda Member 208 posts Joined Aug 2011 Location: Australia More info | May 03, 2012 23:12 | #1366 kin2son wrote in post #14376722 ![]() wow, are you sure? Even at this size i can spot the onions...it's very obvious dude. This is really turning into one of those Fuji X10 owners posting sample saying no 'white orbs' when they are clearly in the sample ![]() All I see is a mint choc icecream Photo: 5DMk3 | 17-40mm F4 L | 24-105mm F4 L | Σ 50mm f1.4 | 70-200mm F4 L | 600EX-RT/YN-565EX |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mafoo Goldmember ![]() 1,503 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2011 More info | May 03, 2012 23:33 | #1367 Sunthing Productions wrote in post #14376234 ![]() http://www.amazon.com …TF8&qid=1336098245&sr=8-1 ![]() For the people besides myself who already have the 24-70L, what's your final verdict? Keep the Tamron and sell the Canon, or visa versa? Anyone care to guess which picture belongs to which lens? Canon 24-70 or Tamron 24-70? Ok, so the big question... -Jeremy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 03, 2012 23:36 | #1368 Charlie wrote in post #14376721 ![]() Canon on the left, tamron on the right. the canon L is on the table on the second picture..... lol If this was shot on tripod, Tammy seems a bit wider. http://www.twilightandtulle.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 03, 2012 23:37 | #1369 kin2son wrote in post #14376722 ![]() wow, are you sure? Even at this size i can spot the onions...it's very obvious dude. This is really turning into one of those Fuji X10 owners posting sample saying no 'white orbs' when they are clearly in the sample ![]() holy crap, caught me red handed, I seriously didnt see it since I dont really pixel peep my images. Definitely got onions! Sony A7riii/A9 - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 03, 2012 23:38 | #1370 amirg wrote in post #14376857 ![]() If this was shot on tripod, Tammy seems a bit wider. yes, I mention that on the fredmiranda thread. Tamron is wider on the short AND long end by about the same amount as compared to the L. Sony A7riii/A9 - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kin2son Goldmember 4,546 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2011 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | May 03, 2012 23:52 | #1371 ![]() Charlie wrote in post #14376862 ![]() holy crap, caught me red handed, I seriously didnt see it since I dont really pixel peep my images. Definitely got onions! yea. It's really sad as I also want to upgrade my 24-105 to this. But now that I know the onions are there, I will always look for them in my picture and I know this will bug me....so it's a no.
20120503-IMG_5899.jpg ![]() ![]() 5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 03, 2012 23:54 | #1372 You guys seen this first impression video?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chantu Senior Member 904 posts Likes: 26 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Silicon Valley More info | May 04, 2012 00:39 | #1373 Sunthing Productions wrote in post #14376234 ![]() http://www.amazon.com …TF8&qid=1336098245&sr=8-1 ![]() For the people besides myself who already have the 24-70L, what's your final verdict? Keep the Tamron and sell the Canon, or visa versa? Anyone care to guess which picture belongs to which lens? Canon 24-70 or Tamron 24-70? Ok, the red ring is the dead giveway. If you can live with "onions", go for the Tamron. The VC wins the day. Canon 5D mk3, 7D mk2, 7D, 17-40L, Canon 85mm f1.8, Canon 70-200mm IS, Canon 17-55mm, Sigma 17-50 OS, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 24-70VC 580ex flash (x3), 550ex, Yonguo 622C triggers, Fuji XE-1, 18-55mm Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HyperYagami Goldmember 2,405 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Poughkeepsie, NY, USA More info | May 04, 2012 00:51 | #1374 Sunthing Productions wrote in post #14376234 ![]() http://www.amazon.com …TF8&qid=1336098245&sr=8-1 ![]() For the people besides myself who already have the 24-70L, what's your final verdict? Keep the Tamron and sell the Canon, or visa versa? Anyone care to guess which picture belongs to which lens? Canon 24-70 or Tamron 24-70? I honestly think the onions are distracting only if one OCD's about it. The advantages IMHO outweigh the disadvantages.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2012 01:22 | #1375 after going through a few more photos, the onion rings are a real issue. Doesnt show up often, and if I were to print, the fix is very fast via adjustment brush. If you are willing to live with the flaw, you'll be rewarded with some very nice shots.
20120503-IMG_5900.jpg ![]() ![]() 1/80 70mm F2.8 ISO-640 Sony A7riii/A9 - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 RXD, 70-200/2.8 VC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
montroyal Member 220 posts Joined Jul 2011 More info | May 04, 2012 01:44 | #1376 well well i can't wait to receive my 5D Mark 3, but i will definitely keep my Canon 24-70 MkI Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 24-70 2.8L, Canon 70-200 4L IS, Canon 17-40 4L, flash Canon 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pepeto2001 Mostly Lurking 10 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | May 04, 2012 02:15 | #1377 Leffe67 wrote in post #14374911 ![]() I agree with all your points above. I was just thinking aloud that a side by side comparison may put some of this to bed. It is after all a relative issue. I'm kicking around the idea of moving from my 7D to a 5D MKIII and would probably need a standard zoom to go with it. Considering the Tamron, the 24-70 Canon and the 24-105 Canon, since it's at such a discount in the 5D kit. I'm also with same thoughts... moving from 7D 15-85 to 5D3 + one of these lens.... 24-105 or the new tamron....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kin2son Goldmember 4,546 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2011 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | May 04, 2012 02:22 | #1378 ![]() pepeto2001 wrote in post #14377294 ![]() Anybody moving from 24-105 to the new tamron?, sharper?, not a good idea? Main question isn't about the sharpness. If onion bokeh doesn't bother you, then definitely Tamron. If not, one of the Canon. 5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mafoo Goldmember ![]() 1,503 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2011 More info | May 04, 2012 08:11 | #1379 kin2son wrote in post #14377310 ![]() Main question isn't about the sharpness. If onion bokeh doesn't bother you, then definitely Tamron. If not, one of the Canon. Agreed. This is the move I was going to make (24-105 to 24-70), but the onion bokeh does bother me a great deal -Jeremy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." ![]() More info | May 04, 2012 08:19 | #1380 mafoo wrote in post #14378050 ![]() Agreed. This is the move I was going to make (24-105 to 24-70), but the onion bokeh does bother me a great deal ![]() it's a shame too, because everything else about the lens is steller. Wish it didn't have that one flaw. Stop down more. TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is smithronan 953 guests, 206 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |