
Stop down more.
Will that remove the onion bokeh?
mtimber Cream of the Crop ![]() 5,011 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Cambs, UK More info | May 04, 2012 09:07 | #1381 RDKirk wrote in post #14378073 ![]() Stop down more. Will that remove the onion bokeh? "Owning lots of expensive gear is very important. I helps those of us without talent appear as if we really know what we're doing" (Belmondo)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Leffe67 Senior Member 257 posts Joined Nov 2011 Location: Connecticut More info | May 04, 2012 09:23 | #1382 Out of curiosity, for those of us who aren't yet PP ninjas, what's the best way to clean up onion-y bokeh? Leffe67
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SuzyView Cream of the Crop ![]() More info | May 04, 2012 09:33 | #1383 Sunthing Productions wrote in post #14376234 ![]() http://www.amazon.com …TF8&qid=1336098245&sr=8-1 ![]() For the people besides myself who already have the 24-70L, what's your final verdict? Keep the Tamron and sell the Canon, or visa versa? Anyone care to guess which picture belongs to which lens? Canon 24-70 or Tamron 24-70? http://img.photobucket.com …314/Xcellere/compare3.jpg ![]() Sorry, but the images surpassed our 1024x1024 restriction by a lot. Can you repost, but to fit, as I think these are valuable to see? Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2012 09:39 | #1384 Leffe67 wrote in post #14378338 ![]() Out of curiosity, for those of us who aren't yet PP ninjas, what's the best way to clean up onion-y bokeh? I assume a little dab of the blurring brush on each offending onion? Or something else? graduated filter or brush in lightroom Sony A7siii/A7iii/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mafoo Goldmember ![]() 1,503 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2011 More info | May 04, 2012 10:36 | #1385 RDKirk wrote in post #14378073 ![]() Stop down more. Then why give up my 70-105 range, if in the end I am at F4 or higher anyway? -Jeremy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SchnellerGT Senior Member 585 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Washington, DC More info | May 04, 2012 10:42 | #1386 So I have been following threads on this lens on several forums and the consensus seems negative. Canon EOS 5D Mark II | Canon 24-70 2.8L II [FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2][FONT=Tahoma]| Canon 40mm Pancake | Canon EF 85 1.8 USM | Canon EF 135 F2L USM | Canon Speedlite 430 EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sunthing Productions Member 71 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | May 04, 2012 10:42 | #1387 arentol wrote in post #14376687 ![]() Can't tell.... Too distracted by the cute girl, cute kitty, rolling? (I hope, that would be beyond awesome) cart or tray with cheese, drink glasses, and videogame controller, bottle of alcohol by a blender, and fresh bananas on a hanger. That is like 7 of my top 20 greatest things in life right there! Kidding aside, the one on the right (second one) looks like the Tamron, but they are pretty close. I think the high ISO is holding the Tamron back a little to tell you the truth, hiding some of its sharpness advantage. lol yes, it's a rolling cart. The wife made margaritas earlier Charlie wrote in post #14376721 ![]() Canon on the left, tamron on the right. the canon L is on the table on the second picture..... lol lol there we go! I knew some eagle eye would spot it. mafoo wrote in post #14376843 ![]() Ok, so the big question... Obviously you had to walk across the room to swap lenses.. The cat didn't move a millimeter... Is it stuffed? P.S. Your wife is cute as hell. He's a live kitty SuzyView wrote in post #14378398 ![]() Sorry, but the images surpassed our 1024x1024 restriction by a lot. Can you repost, but to fit, as I think these are valuable to see? Sure, here's the resize. Bigger version here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." ![]() More info | May 04, 2012 11:06 | #1388 mafoo wrote in post #14378709 ![]() Then why give up my 70-105 range, if in the end I am at F4 or higher anyway? Indeed. Multiple choices abound. Ain't life grand? TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2012 11:23 | #1389 the digitalpicture has done some vignetting tests on the new Tamron 24-70 VC. Looks like he has a really good copy because I'm not seeing much at all in his results. _
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mafoo Goldmember ![]() 1,503 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2011 More info | May 04, 2012 11:30 | #1390 davidc502 wrote in post #14378939 ![]() the digitalpicture has done some vignetting tests on the new Tamron 24-70 VC. Looks like he has a really good copy because I'm not seeing much at all in his results. http://thedigitalpicture.com …&CameraComp=0&FLI=0&API=0 ![]() It's easier to see on this page: -Jeremy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pepeto2001 Mostly Lurking 10 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | May 04, 2012 11:42 | #1391 I hope they'll post soon the resolution chart test!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2012 11:53 | #1392 davidc502 wrote in post #14378939 ![]() the digitalpicture has done some vignetting tests on the new Tamron 24-70 VC. Looks like he has a really good copy because I'm not seeing much at all in his results. http://thedigitalpicture.com …&CameraComp=0&FLI=0&API=0 ![]() the vignetting issue is a little overblown, like the onion bokeh. Both real issues, but overblown. I've done 0 vignetting correction in any of my photos, and only a few on my flickr stream are actually cropped. It's one of those things that you have to go and search for the problem for it to be apparent. Sony A7siii/A7iii/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2012 11:55 | #1393 pepeto2001 wrote in post #14379019 ![]() I hope they'll post soon the resolution chart test! FWIW, I did a few comparisons: Sony A7siii/A7iii/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
montroyal Member 220 posts Joined Jul 2011 More info | May 04, 2012 12:10 | #1394 talked to a reseller today and the guy told me that i would have a better chance to get a good copy of the Canon rather than the Tamron Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 24-70 2.8L, Canon 70-200 4L IS, Canon 17-40 4L, flash Canon 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." ![]() More info | May 04, 2012 12:13 | #1395 SchnellerGT wrote in post #14378735 ![]() So I have been following threads on this lens on several forums and the consensus seems negative. Crap. Any updates on the 24-70 MkII? I don't see any such consensus that means much yet...the threads run the same way they're running for the 5D3: It's not perfect in every way, so it sucks. TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is TexShan 990 guests, 303 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |