well i guess i'll try once more and see what happens from there. thanks!
blog updated!
http://steveniphoto.wordpress.com/2012/05/13/sunday/
roosterslayer Senior Member 994 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: SF, CA More info | May 13, 2012 23:56 | #3016 well i guess i'll try once more and see what happens from there. thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
roosterslayer Senior Member 994 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: SF, CA More info | May 14, 2012 23:41 | #3017 |
MattPharmD Senior Member  255 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2011 More info | May 15, 2012 11:43 | #3018 Hey Guys, I have a quick question for you film guys. I still have my original SLR (a Rebel 2000). I was recently given a box of in date kodak film and wanted to break out the film camera. This is only a hobby so I was going to just get the film developed at the drug store, but I wanted to know if the Kodak picture CD's gave you decent images or if I should get the film scanned another way. Photography is just a hobby for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
roosterslayer Senior Member 994 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: SF, CA More info | May 15, 2012 12:29 | #3019 MattPharmD wrote in post #14435209 Hey Guys, I have a quick question for you film guys. I still have my original SLR (a Rebel 2000). I was recently given a box of in date kodak film and wanted to break out the film camera. This is only a hobby so I was going to just get the film developed at the drug store, but I wanted to know if the Kodak picture CD's gave you decent images or if I should get the film scanned another way. if you go to somewhere like walgreens they give you extremely low res scans. you can go to a photo lab and have them scanned but they are very pricey (at least around my area).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cuypers1807 Intact?  1,730 posts Likes: 160 Joined May 2008 Location: Equally far from everything! More info |
Cuypers1807 Intact? 1,730 posts Likes: 160 Joined May 2008 Location: Equally far from everything! More info |
h4ppydaze Goldmember 1,329 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2011 More info | May 16, 2012 15:22 | #3022 ^Maan me wants a larger format camera... For now 645 is fine but I want something 6x7 or 6x9      just scanned in a roll, I kind of shoot at a really slow pace with my GS645s. Sometimes takes weeks to finish a roll off.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cuypers1807 Intact? 1,730 posts Likes: 160 Joined May 2008 Location: Equally far from everything! More info | May 16, 2012 15:43 | #3023 h4ppydaze wrote in post #14441635 ^Maan me wants a larger format camera... For now 645 is fine but I want something 6x7 or 6x9 Just wait. Once you get 6x7 then you will want to move to 4x5. I am now working between 6x6 and 4x5 and would love to shoot 8x10. Joby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
h4ppydaze Goldmember 1,329 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2011 More info | May 16, 2012 19:54 | #3024 Cuypers1807 wrote in post #14441767 Just wait. Once you get 6x7 then you will want to move to 4x5. I am now working between 6x6 and 4x5 and would love to shoot 8x10. Oh yea... I love large formats... Have done some 4x5, 5x7, but no 8x10. I just want a 6x7 (probably mamiya 7) because theyre still practical for hand holding. I guess there are some 4x5s you can hand hold but the convenience of roll film cant be denied. I hate standing in the dark for half an hour
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cuypers1807 Intact? 1,730 posts Likes: 160 Joined May 2008 Location: Equally far from everything! More info | May 16, 2012 22:10 | #3025 h4ppydaze wrote in post #14442834 Oh yea... I love large formats... Have done some 4x5, 5x7, but no 8x10. I just want a 6x7 (probably mamiya 7) because theyre still practical for hand holding. I guess there are some 4x5s you can hand hold but the convenience of roll film cant be denied. I hate standing in the dark for half an hour Wait till you see my new toy that will hopefully arrive this week. Joby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
agphotography Goldmember  3,726 posts Likes: 5 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Orange County, CA More info | May 16, 2012 22:49 | #3026 Ahhhh Mamiya 7. I really NEED (yes, NEED) that camera. Along with the 43 and 80mm lenses. -Abram-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
h4ppydaze Goldmember 1,329 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2011 More info | May 17, 2012 13:34 | #3027
Untitled by kyuis, on Flickr Untitled by kyuis, on FlickrSunny 16 makes things easier on the Canonet...  3200 film in a venue is a little trickier but I can make things work, the roll turned out fine. B+W negative film is almost fool-proof, apparently.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
agphotography Goldmember 3,726 posts Likes: 5 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Orange County, CA More info | May 17, 2012 19:56 | #3028 That is true. Negs are very very forgiving. One of my favorite things about shooting film. -Abram-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chr11st1an Member 71 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 More info | Took a walk with some Delta 400.  Wilshire by angelohchristian, on Flickrgraphic designer / photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarmO.Set Goldmember  2,090 posts Likes: 198 Joined Dec 2011 Location: Christiansburg, VA More info | May 18, 2012 08:31 | #3030 Here are a few frames from my ultra cheap Fuji Xtra (?) 400.  gradient by Marm O. Set, on FlickrFD 85 f/1.8  wiffle by Marm O. Set, on FlickrFD 35 f/2.8?  george by Marm O. Set, on FlickrFD 50 f/1.8  witch by Marm O. Set, on FlickrFD 85 f/1.8 I'm picking up my first roll of TX 400 in a few hours... can't wait to see how they turned out  _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is JuliusFilip 768 guests, 363 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
